Dataset Information

The Impact of Sequence of Chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI Treatment on Different EGFR Mutation Lung Adenocarcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Chemotherapy as first-/second-line treatment in different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation lung adenocarcinoma remains controversial.

Methods

Consecutive patients were collected between 2009 and 2012. Patients were divided into two groups (1st-line chemotherapy: n = 56 and 2nd-line chemotherapy: n = 55). Their outcomes profiles were analyzed.

Results

The overall survival (OS) of all patients (390 versus 662 days, p < 0.0001), as well as both progression-free survival (PFS, 151 versus 252 days, p = 0.0001) and OS (308 versus 704 days, p = 0.0001) of patients with L858R mutation (n = 63), who received 2nd-line chemotherapy, was significantly poor. By univariate and multivariate analysis, 2nd-line chemotherapy, and L858R mutation were significantly related to poor PFS and OS.

Conclusion

In advanced lung adenocarcinoma, L858R mutation and 2nd-line chemotherapy caused a poor outcome. It is a consideration to choice of 1st-line chemotherapy in these subjects. A prospective design is warranted to confirm this finding.

SUBMITTER: Chung FT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC4644829 | biostudies-literature | 2015

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The Impact of Sequence of Chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI Treatment on Different EGFR Mutation Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Chung Fu-Tsai FT Ho Ming-Yun MY Fang Yueh-Fu YF Hshieh Meng-Heng MH Wang Tsai-Yu TY Kuo Chih-Hsi CH Chen Hao-Cheng HC Wang Chun-Hwa CH Lin Shu-Min SM Yu Chih-Teng CT Lin Horng-Chyuan HC Kuo Han-Pin HP

BioMed research international 20151102

<h4>Objectives</h4>Chemotherapy as first-/second-line treatment in different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation lung adenocarcinoma remains controversial.<h4>Methods</h4>Consecutive patients were collected between 2009 and 2012. Patients were divided into two groups (1st-line chemotherapy: n = 56 and 2nd-line chemotherapy: n = 55). Their outcomes profiles were analyzed.<h4>Results</h4>The overall survival (OS) of all patients (390 versus 662 days, p < 0.0001), as well as both progr ...[more]

PMID: 26609535

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundKeeping on original epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment is the standard treatment for gradual progression EGFR-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Angiogenic pathway can lead to EGFR-TKI resistance, but the effectiveness of combination strategies in this group is still controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the original EGFR-TKI combined with bevacizumab in advanced and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR-mutation who experience gradual progression in a real-world setting.MethodsFrom June 2019 to December 2021, a total of 35 metastatic EGFR positive NSCLC patients experienced gradual progression after EGFR-TKI treatments and received original TKI combined with bevacizumab were identified at Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, China. All patients were confirmed EGFR positive by rebiopsy before treatment. Patients were treated with EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W) after gradual progression until rapid progression or intolerable toxicity. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival 1 (PFS1, period from the beginning of EGFR-TKI treatment to the rapid progression of the disease), PFS2 (period from the beginning of EGFR-TKI combined with bevacizumab treatment to the rapid progression of the disease), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events of the combined treatment were collected and analyzed.ResultsA total of 33 patients could participate the efficacy evaluation. Median PFS1 and PFS2 were 20.5 and 8 months, respectively; DCR was 93.94%; median OS was immature. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that smoking status [hazard ratio (HR) =3.692, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.450-9.404, P=0.006], combined EGFR T790M mutation or rare mutation (HR =2.480, 95% CI: 1.073-5.729, P=0.034), and malignant pleural effusion (HR =3.707, 95% CI: 1.460-9.414, P=0.006) were independent risk factors for PFS2. The most common treatment-related adverse events greater than grade 3 included hypertension (23.7%), proteinuria (8.3%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 4.1%) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST; 2.9%).ConclusionsContinuous original TKI combined with bevacizumab showed partly favorable efficacy and safety and may represent a therapeutic option for metastatic EGFR-mutation NSCLC patients experiencing gradual progression after EGFR-TKI treatment.

Project description:BackgroundThe efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy in patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant remains unsatisfactory. This study explored the potential benefits of combining first-generation EGFR-TKI with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsThe medical records of patients with III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received neoadjuvant therapy with EGFR-TKI at Shanghai Chest Hospital from October 2011 to October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received first-generation TKI combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment were included in the combination group, and those who received EGFR-TKI monotherapy were included in the monotherapy group. The study assessed the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), downstaging rates of pathologic lymph nodes (from stage N2 to N1 or N0), major pathologic response (MPR) rate, pathological complete response (PCR) rate, and safety.ResultsA total of 74 631 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were screened, and 60 patients were included, 7 of whom did not undergo surgery after neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Of the remaining 53 patients, 15 received first-generation EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, and 38 received EGFR-TKI monotherapy. The median follow-up time was 44.12 months. The ORR was 50.0% (9/18) in the combination group and 40.5% (17/42) in the monotherapy group (P = .495). The MPR rate was 20.0% (3/15) and 10.5% (4/38) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = .359). No patients achieved PCR in the combination group, while 3 (7.89%) attained PCR in the monotherapy group. The 2 groups did not differ in N2 downstaging rate (P = .459). The median DFS was not reached in the combination group, while it was 23.6 months (95% CI: 8.16-39.02) in the monotherapy group (P = .832). Adverse events observed were consistent with those commonly associated with the 2 treatments.ConclusionCombination therapy with first-generation EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy could be considered a neoadjuvant treatment option for patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC, exhibiting acceptable toxicity. However, regarding short-term efficacy, combination therapy did not demonstrate superiority over EGFR-TKI monotherapy. Long-term follow-up is warranted for a more accurate assessment of the DFS and OS.

Project description:Simple Summary Although it is known that anti-PD1/L1 monotherapy does not render significant benefit in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, whether the addition of anti-PD1/L1 therapy to chemotherapy can enhance chemotherapy efficacy for TKI-refractory EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients is not clear. To address this question, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 178 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients who had progressed on EGFR TKIs and received subsequent non-TKI systemic therapy to determine whether the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy truly improves clinical outcomes. We found that the addition of anti-PD1 immunotherapy did not add benefit to the platinum-based chemotherapy at the time of TKI progression for EGFR-mutant LUAD. Although underpowered, the anti-VEGF therapy demonstrated a trend towards adding benefit. As ongoing clinical trials with newer agents or combinations demonstrate preliminary efficacy in TKI-resistant EGFR-mutant LUAD patients, the ideal choice for post-TKI treatment is still being evaluated. Abstract Background: The benefit of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients whose tumor developed resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is not thoroughly investigated. The goal of this retrospective cohort study is to assess the clinical efficiency of immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled LUAD patients with EGFR sensitive mutations whose tumor had acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs and received systemic treatment with chemotherapy (chemo; n = 84), chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (chemoIO; n = 30), chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without IO (withBev; n = 42), and IO monotherapy (IO-mono; n = 22). Clinical progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Associations of clinical characteristics with outcomes were assessed using univariable and multi-covariate Cox Proportional Hazards regression models. Results: A total of 178 patients (median age = 63.3; 57.9% females) with a median follow-up time of 42.0 (Interquartile range: 22.9–67.8) months were enrolled. There was no significant difference in PFS between chemoIO vs. chemo groups (5.3 vs. 4.8 months, p = 0.8). Compared to the chemo group, patients who received withBev therapy trended towards better PFS (6.1 months vs. 4.8; p = 0.3; HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.52–1.20), while patients treated with IO-mono had inferior PFS (2.2 months; p = 0.001; HR 2.22; 95% CI: 1.37–3.59). Furthermore, PD-L1 level was not associated with PFS benefit in the chemoIO group. Patients with EGFR-mutant LUAD with high PD-L1 (≥50%) had shorter PFS (5.8 months) than non-EGFR/ALK LUAD patients who received chemoIO (12.8 months, p = 0.002; HR 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08–0.56) as first-line treatment. Chemotherapy-based therapy rendered similar benefit to patients with either EGFR exon19 deletion vs. L858R in the LUAD. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis revealed that immunotherapy provided limited additional benefit to chemotherapy in TKI-refractory EGFR-mutant LUAD. Chemotherapy alone or combined with bevacizumab remain good choices for patients with actionable EGFR mutations.

Dataset Information

The Impact of Sequence of Chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI Treatment on Different EGFR Mutation Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The Impact of Sequence of Chemotherapy and EGFR-TKI Treatment on Different EGFR Mutation Lung Adenocarcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets