Dataset Information

Impact of skin capsular distance on the performance of controlled attenuation parameter in patients with chronic liver disease.

ABSTRACT:

Background & aims

Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a non-invasive method for evaluating hepatic steatosis. However, larger skin capsular distance (SCD) can affect the accuracy. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of SCD on the diagnostic performance of CAP and liver stiffness measurement (LSM).

Methods

Of 101 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 280 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who underwent liver biopsy were prospectively recruited. CAP, LSM and SCD were performed using FibroScan with M probe. The areas under receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROCs) were calculated to determine the diagnostic efficacy. The optimal thresholds were defined by the maximum Youden index.

Results

SCD (B 30.34, P < 0.001) and hepatic steatosis (B 23.04, P < 0.001) were independently associated with CAP by multivariate analysis. The AUROCs were slightly higher for SCD <25 mm compared to those for SCD ≥25 mm for steatosis ≥5% (0.88 vs. 0.81), >33% (0.90 vs. 0.85) and >66% (0.84 vs. 0.72). For SCD <25 mm, the optimal CAP cut-offs for differentiating steatosis ≥5%, >33% and >66% were 255.0 dB/m, 283.5 dB/m and 293.5 dB/m. However, cut-offs were elevated by approximately 60-70 dB/m for SCD ≥25 mm. When stratified by fibrosis grade, LSM was significantly affected by SCD ≥25 mm for advanced fibrosis (≥F3) in NAFLD, but not in CHB.

Conclusion

CAP is a promising tool for detecting and quantifying hepatic steatosis. SCD ≥25 mm may cause overestimation of steatosis. Similarly, SCD ≥25 mm affects the detection of advanced fibrosis by LSM in NAFLD patients.

SUBMITTER: Shen F

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5023997 | biostudies-literature | 2015 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of skin capsular distance on the performance of controlled attenuation parameter in patients with chronic liver disease.

Shen Feng F Zheng Rui-Dan RD Shi Jun-Ping JP Mi Yu-Qiang YQ Chen Guo-Feng GF Hu Xiqi X Liu Yong-Gang YG Wang Xiao-Ying XY Pan Qin Q Chen Guang-Yu GY Chen Jian-Neng JN Xu Liang L Zhang Rui-Nan RN Xu Lei-Ming LM Fan Jian-Gao JG

Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 20150306 11

<h4>Background & aims</h4>Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a non-invasive method for evaluating hepatic steatosis. However, larger skin capsular distance (SCD) can affect the accuracy. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of SCD on the diagnostic performance of CAP and liver stiffness measurement (LSM).<h4>Methods</h4>Of 101 patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and 280 patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who underwent liver biopsy were prospectively ...[more]

PMID: 25689614

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLiver stiffness (LS) measured by vibration-controlled transient elastography (VCTE) is influenced by liver fibrosis and hepatic perfusion pressure. VCTE-based controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) is a noninvasive marker for hepatic steatosis (HS).AimsTo investigate the diagnostic performance of CAP in patients with advanced chronic liver disease (ACLD)/portal hypertension (PHT: hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥ 6 mmHg).MethodsEighty-eight patients with LS ≥ 10 kPa and/or HVPG ≥ 6 mmHg who underwent simultaneous liver biopsy, CAP, and HVPG measurement were included. HS was histologically graded according to the modified Brunt classification.ResultsPatient characteristics: Mean MELD:11 (standard derivation [SD] ± 4), median HVPG:16 (interquartile range [IQR]10-19) mmHg, median LS:27.4 (IQR 16.2-48.9) kPa, and mean CAP:221 (SD ± 75) dB/m. According to histology, 47 (53.4%) patients had no HS (S0), 28 (31.8%) had S1, 11 (12.5%) had S2, and 2 (2.3%) had S3. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of CAP for diagnosing any HS (S0 vs. ≥ S1) was 0.692 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 0.582-0.802) in the overall cohort, 0.830 (95% CI 0.637-1.0) in patients with HVPG < 10 mmHg, and 0.629 (95% CI 0.497-0.761) in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH; HVPG ≥ 10 mmHg; n = 69). Using the established cutoff for any HS (248 dB/m), the sensitivity/specificity of CAP was only 48.8%/76.6%, respectively. In contrast, the AUROC and sensitivity/specificity (cutoff 268 dB/m) for diagnosing HS ≥ S2 were 0.842 (95% CI 0.747-0.936) and 84.6%/81.3%, respectively. CAP correlated with the percentage of steatotic hepatocytes (Spearman's ρ = 0.402; p ≤ 0.001) and showed a weak correlation with liver stiffness (ρ = 0.225; p = 0.035).ConclusionsThe diagnostic performance of CAP for any HS seems to be limited in patients with ACLD, if CSPH is present.

Project description:Obesity and steatosis have been associated with liver disease progression in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) (liver stiffness measurement [LSM] ≥ 10 kPa). The controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) estimates steatosis during LSM by transient elastography. We aimed to evaluate whether CAP is associated with the development of clinically relevant events in cACLD. Consecutive patients with cACLD and CAP measurements observed between September 2013 and September 2015 were retrospectively studied. Classical decompensation and severe bacterial infections on follow-up were recorded. A predefined CAP cut-off for steatosis was used (220 dB/m; 90% sensitivity). The association among LSM, CAP, and events was assessed by univariate and multivariate Cox regression. Among the 193 patients (viral etiology = 58%; median Child score = 5; LSM = 15.1 kPa; CAP = 255 ± 62 dB/m) who were followed up in median for 18 months, 18 developed clinically relevant events (11 liver decompensation, 7 severe bacterial infections). Patients developing events had higher LSM (median: 30.8 versus 14.3 kPa, P < 0.001) and showed trends for higher CAP (275 ± 46 versus 252 ± 63 dB/m, P = 0.07), lower platelet count (134 ± 74 versus 167 ± 74 G/L, P = 0.07), and worse liver function versus patients remaining compensated. Body mass index was similar in the two groups. All events were more frequent in patients with CAP being greater than or equal to 220 dB/m (12.9% versus 1.6% in CAP < 220; P = 0.013), and 10 of 11 episodes of liver decompensation occurred in patients with CAP being greater than or equal to 220 dB/m. Following multivariate analysis, LSM and CAP greater than or equal to 220 dB/m remained independently associated with clinical events in the whole population and in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension. Conclusion: The CAP being greater than or equal to 220 dB/m is associated with increased risk of clinical decompensation and bacterial infections independent of LSM in patients with cACLD and allows refining the noninvasive risk stratification in this population. (Hepatology Communications 2018; 00:000-000).

Project description:Background & aimsAssessment of hepatic steatosis by transient elastography (TE)-based controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) might predict hepatic decompensation. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of CAP in patients with compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) and decompensated cirrhosis (DC).MethodsA total of 430 patients who underwent TE (liver stiffness ≥10 kPa) and CAP measurements were included in this retrospective analysis. Half of patients (n = 189) underwent simultaneous HVPG measurement. In cACLD patients, first hepatic decompensation was defined by new onset of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy or variceal bleeding. In patients with DC, the following events were considered as further hepatic decompensation: requirement of paracentesis, admission for/development of grade 3/4 hepatic encephalopathy, variceal (re-)bleeding or liver-related death.ResultsFirst hepatic decompensation occurred in 25 of 292 (9%) cACLD patients, while 46 of 138 (33%) DC patients developed further hepatic decompensation during a median follow-up of 22 and 12 months respectively. CAP was not predictive of first (cACLD; per 10 dB/m; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.97, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.91-1.03, P = 0.321) or further hepatic decompensation (DC; HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.94-1.03, P = 0.554) in adjusted analysis. Using the well-established CAP cut-off of ≥248 dB/m for hepatic steatosis, the incidence of first (cACLD; P = 0.065) and further hepatic decompensation (DC; P = 0.578) was similar in patients with hepatic steatosis or without. Serum albumin levels (per mg/dL; HR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.77-0.89, P < 0.001) and MELD-Na (per point; HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.04-1.28, P = 0.006) in cACLD and MELD-Na (per point; HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.19, P < 0.0001) in DC patients were the only parameters independently associated with first and further hepatic decompensation, respectively.ConclusionControlled attenuation parameter does not predict the development of first (cACLD)/further (DC) hepatic decompensation, while serum albumin levels and MELD-Na are of prognostic value.

Dataset Information

Impact of skin capsular distance on the performance of controlled attenuation parameter in patients with chronic liver disease.

Background & aims

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Impact of skin capsular distance on the performance of controlled attenuation parameter in patients with chronic liver disease.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets