Dataset Information

Gastroenteropancreatic Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and Position Statement.

ABSTRACT: : In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms was reviewed and validated the crucial role of the proliferative rate. According to the WHO classification 2010, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are classified as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of grade 1 or 2 in up to 84%, or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas in 6%-8%. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are of grade G. Recently, a proportion of neuroendocrine tumors presenting a number of mitoses or a Ki-67 index higher than 20% and a well-differentiated morphology have been identified, calling for a new category, well-differentiated grade 3 NET (NET G-3). Studies that have reported the characteristics of neuroendocrine neoplasms have identified more well-differentiated NET G-3 than neuroendocrine carcinomas. The main localizations of NET G-3 are the pancreas, stomach, and colon. Treatment for NET G-3 is not standardized and is balanced between G-1/2 neuroendocrine tumor and neuroendocrine carcinoma treatments. In nonmetastatic neuroendocrine tumors, the European and American guidelines recommended a surgical resection for localized neuroendocrine neoplasm, irrespective of the tumor grading. In NET G-3, chemotherapy is the benchmark if the main treatment goal is reduction of the tumor mass, particularly if it would allow a secondary surgery. In the present work, we review the epidemiology and make recommendations for the management of NET G-3.

Implications for practice

Neuroendocrine tumors presenting a number of mitoses or a Ki-67 index higher than 20% and a well-differentiated morphology have been identified and named well-differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine tumors (NET G-3). The main localizations of NET G-3 are the pancreas, stomach, and colon. The prognosis is worse than that for NET G-2. In nonmetastatic NET G-3, surgery appeared to be the first option. The chemotherapy regimen in pancreatic NET G-3 should be in line with that implemented in NET G-1/2 when the Ki-67 index is below 55% and should be in line with that implemented for neuroendocrine carcinoma when Ki-67 is above 55%.

SUBMITTER: Coriat R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5061528 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Gastroenteropancreatic Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and Position Statement.

Coriat Romain R Walter Thomas T Terris Benoît B Couvelard Anne A Ruszniewski Philippe P

The oncologist 20160708 10

: In 2010, the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms was reviewed and validated the crucial role of the proliferative rate. According to the WHO classification 2010, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are classified as well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of grade 1 or 2 in up to 84%, or poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas in 6%-8%. Neuroendocrine carcinomas are of grade G. Recently, a proportion of neuroendocrine tumors p ...[more]

PMID: 27401895

Similar Datasets

Project description:Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represent the most common subtype of NETs. The incidence of all NETs, and specifically GEP NETs, has risen exponentially over the last three decades. Only within the past several years have these tumors been appropriately classified, allowing for meaningful drug development. Broadly, some of the most exciting drug classes being developed for patients with well-differentiated GEP NETs include newer types of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) or combinations which increase the potency of lutetium-177 (177Lu)-Dotatate, novel multi-target receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RTKIs) and immunotherapy modalities, beyond checkpoint inhibitors, which seek to unleash the immune system against NETs. Specifically looking at newer types of PRRT, somatostatin receptor antagonists and alpha-emitter radionuclides each have demonstrated the ability to elicit greater DNA damage than 177Lu-Dotatate in preclinical models. Early clinical experiences with each of these agents suggest they may be more cytotoxic than 177Lu-Dotatate. Other approaches seeking to build upon the DNA damage created by 177Lu-Dotatate include combinations of PRRT with radiosensitizers such as heat shock protein 90 inhibitors, hedgehog inhibitors, chemotherapy combinations, and triapine. Many of these combinations have just begun to be tested clinically. With regards to novel RTKIs, some of the ones which have demonstrated potent cytoreductive potential include cabozantinib and lenvatinib. Other RTKIs which are further along the clinical development spectrum and have demonstrated benefit in randomized trials include surufatinib and pazopanib. And though single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitors have not demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity in patients with GEP NETs, outside of certain biomarker selected subsets, somatostatin receptor-directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells and vaccines such as SurVaxM, which targets survivin, represent two means through which NET-directed immunity may be modulated. The potential of these agents, if clinically realized, will likely improve outcomes for patients with well-differentiated GEP NETs.

Project description:IntroductionRecent classification of neuroendocrine neoplasms has defined well-differentiated high-grade neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) as a distinct entity from poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma. The optimal treatment for NET G3 has not been well-described. This study aimed to evaluate metastatic NET G3 response to different treatment regimens.Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective study of patients with NET G3 within the Mayo Clinic database. Patients' demographics along with treatment characteristics, responses, and survival were assessed. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival. Secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR).ResultsTreatment data was available in 30 patients with median age of 59.5 years at diagnosis. The primary tumor was mostly pancreatic (73.3%). Ki-67 index was ≥55% in 26.7% of cases. Treatments included capecitabine + temozolomide (CAPTEM) (n = 20), lutetium 177 DOTATATE (PRRT; n = 10), Platinum-etoposide (EP; n = 8), FOLFOX (n = 7), and everolimus (n = 2). CAPTEM exhibited ORR 35%, DCR 65%, and median PFS 9.4 months (95% confidence interval, 2.96-16.07). Both EP and FOLFOX showed similar radiographic response rates with ORR 25.0% and 28.6%; however, median PFS durations were quite distinct at 2.94 and 13.04 months, respectively. PRRT had ORR of 20%, DCR of 70%, and median PFS of 9.13 months.ConclusionAmong patients with NET G3, CAPTEM was the most commonly used treatment with clinically meaningful efficacy and disease control. FOLFOX or PRRT are other potentially active treatment options. EP has some activity in NET G3, but responses appear to be short-lived. Prospective studies evaluating different treatments effects in patients with NET G3 are needed to determine an optimal treatment strategy.Implications for practiceHigh-grade well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET G3) are considered a different entity from low-grade NET and neuroendocrine carcinoma in terms of prognosis and management. The oral combination of capecitabine and temozolomide is considered a good option in the management of metastatic NET G3 and may be preferred. FOLFOX is another systemic option with reasonable efficacy. Similar to other well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy seems to have some efficacy in these tumors.

Project description:Objective: To report the rate of candidate actionable somatic mutations in patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastro-enteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and of other genetic alterations that may be associated with tumorigenesis. Methods: A phase II mutation targeted therapy trial was conducted in patients with advanced well-differentiated G1/G2 GEP-NET. Mutations found in the mTOR pathway-associated genes led to treatment with the mTOR inhibitor everolimus, and were defined as actionable. Tumor deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from GEP-NET were sequenced and compared with germline DNA, using the OncoVAR-NET assay, designed for hybrid capture sequencing of 500 tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes. Somatic variants were called and copy-number (CN) variant analysis was performed. Results: Thirty patients (14 small-intestine, 8 pancreatic, 3 unknown primary NET, and 5 of other primary sites) harbored 37 lesions (4 patients had DNA of multiple lesions sequenced). Only 2 patients with sporadic NET (n = 26) had an actionable mutation leading to treatment with everolimus. Driver somatic mutations were detected in 18 of 30 patients (21/37 lesions sequenced). In the remaining samples without a driver mutation, CN alterations were found in 11/16 tumors (10/12 patients), including CN loss of chromosome (Chr) 18 (P<.05), CN gain of Chr 5, and loss of Chr 13. CN losses in Chr 18 were more common in patients without driver mutations detected. Pronounced genetic heterogeneity was detected in patients with multiple lesions sequenced. Conclusion: Genome-wide DNA sequencing may identify candidate actionable genes and lead to the identification of novel target genes for advanced well-differentiated GEP-NET. Abbreviations: Chr = chromosome; CN = copy number; DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid; FDA = Food and Drug Administration; GEP = gastro-enteropancreatic; MEN-1 = multiple endocrine neoplasia syndrome type 1; mTOR = mammalian target of rapamycin; NET = neuroendocrine tumor; PFS = progression-free survival; PNET = pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors; SINET = small-intestine neuroendocrine tumor.

Project description:Simple Summary This comprehensive review explores evolving systemic combination regimens for advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) with evidence provided by clinical trials and prospective studies. Phase 1 and 2 trials predominated, with few phase 3 trials impacting clinical practice. Results showed variability in anti-tumor activity of combination regimens, with some showing promising outcomes. Among others, treatments with a peptide receptor radionuclide therapy backbone displayed favorable results and warrant further investigation. In contrast, immune-checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations had limited applicability in this patient population. More extensive trials are needed to determine optimal treatment strategies. Abstract There is an evolving landscape of systemic combination regimens for patients with advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). In this review, we provide a comprehensive outline of the existing clinical trials/prospective studies investigating these combinations. PubMed was searched using key relevant terms to identify articles referring to GEP-NETs and combination treatments. No systematic search of the literature or metanalysis of the data was performed, and we focused on the most recent literature results. Primarily, phase 1 and 2 clinical trials were available, with a smaller number of phase 3 trials, reporting results from combination treatments across a wide range of antiproliferative agents. We identified significant variability in the anti-tumor activity of the reported combinations, with occasional promising results, but only a very small number of practice-changing phase 3 clinical trials. Overall, the peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT)-based combinations (with chemotherapy, dual PPRT, and targeted agents) and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agent combinations with standard chemotherapy were found to have favorable results and may be worth investigating in future, larger-scale trials. In contrast, the immune-checkpoint inhibitor-based combinations were found to have limited applicability in advanced, well-differentiated GEP-NETs.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms with a Ki-67 labeling index greater than 20% were reclassified in 2017 by the World Health Organization into well differentiated (WD) and poorly differentiated grade 3 neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC). The authors describe the cytologic features of grade 3 WD pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms compared with grade 2 neoplasms and NEC. METHODS:Fine-needle aspirates from 65 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms were reviewed, and their cytomorphologic features were compared across grade 2, WD grade 3, and PD small cell type (PD-S), large cell type (PD-L), and type not otherwise specified (PD-NOS) neoplasms. RESULTS:The 65 aspirates consisted of 19 grade 2 neoplasms, 32 WD grade 3 neoplasms, and 14 NECs (6 PD-S, 5 PD-L, and 3 PD-NOS). The medians Ki-67 proliferation index was 11% (range, 3.2%-17%) in grade 2 neoplasms, 40% (range, 21%-89%) in WD grade 3 neoplasms, 80% (range, 63%-95%) in PD-S neoplasms, 39% (range, 25%-61%) in PD-L neoplasms, and 70% (range, 30%-80%) in PD-NOS neoplasms. Both grade 2 and WD grade 3 neoplasms were associated with plasmacytoid morphology and smooth nuclear contours, but WD grade 3 neoplasms had significant increases in abundant cytoplasm (72% vs 17%; P = .007), nuclear tangles (75% vs 42%; P = .006), and apoptosis (86% vs 58%; P = .005). Compared with NECs, WD grade 3 neoplasms had increased plasmacytoid morphology (75% vs 7%; P < .001), smooth nuclear contours (94% vs 64%; P = .02), round nuclei (59% vs 21%; P = .01), and less pleomorphism (13% vs 50%; P = .004), molding (9% vs 79%; P < .001), and necrosis (13% vs 43%; P = .003). WD grade 3 neoplasms had less pleomorphism (13% vs 50%; P = .04), less necrosis (13% vs 60%; P = .04), and more plasmacytoid morphology (75% vs 20%; P = .03) than PD-L. CONCLUSIONS:The prevalence of cytologic features differs in WD grade 3 pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms compared with grade 2 neoplasms and NECs, and these differences assist in the recognition of this newly classified entity. Cancer Cytopathol 2018;126:326-35. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

Dataset Information

Gastroenteropancreatic Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and Position Statement.

Implications for practice

Publications

Gastroenteropancreatic Well-Differentiated Grade 3 Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review and Position Statement.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets