Dataset Information

Family history of dilated cardiomyopathy among patients with heart failure from the HF-ACTION genetic ancillary study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The value of family history (FH) is well established, but its sensitivity to detect familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) has been infrequently examined.

Methods

A genetic ancillary study was created as a component of the HF-ACTION trial, a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial of exercise in patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction <35%. A FH-based study using a structured questionnaire mailed to all consenting individuals was incorporated into the genetic ancillary. FH responses were analyzed for dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) in family members.

Results

Of the 741 individuals with data available, 358 (48.3%) had nonischemic and 383 (51.6%) had ischemic etiology, and of these 164 (45.8%) and 201 (52.4%), respectively, returned evaluable questionnaires. Of those with nonischemic etiology, 14/164 (8.5%) reported at least one first-degree family member with DCM or an enlarged heart; another 21/164 (12.8%) reported a FH of "cardiomyopathy," a less specific term to indicate DCM.

Conclusion

At least 8.5% of patients with nonischemic etiology in the HF-ACTION genetic ancillary study provided FH indicating familial DCM, information important to inform further genetic analyses of this cohort and to plan other studies.

SUBMITTER: Hudson L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5350848 | biostudies-literature | 2013 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Family history of dilated cardiomyopathy among patients with heart failure from the HF-ACTION genetic ancillary study.

Hudson Laura L Morales Ana A Mauro Ana Clara AC Whellan David D Adams Kirkwood F KF O'Connor Christopher M CM Hershberger Ray E RE

Clinical and translational science 20130424 3

<h4>Background</h4>The value of family history (FH) is well established, but its sensitivity to detect familial dilated cardiomyopathy (FDC) has been infrequently examined.<h4>Methods</h4>A genetic ancillary study was created as a component of the HF-ACTION trial, a multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial of exercise in patients with heart failure and an ejection fraction <35%. A FH-based study using a structured questionnaire mailed to all consenting individuals was incorporated int ...[more]

PMID: 23751021

Similar Datasets

Project description:AimsIn TRED-HF, 40% of patients with recovered dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) relapsed in the short term after therapy withdrawal. This follow-up investigates the longer-term effects of therapy withdrawal.Methods and resultsTRED-HF was a randomized trial investigating heart failure therapy withdrawal in patients with recovered DCM over 6 months. Those randomized to continue therapy subsequently withdrew treatment between 6 and 12 months. Participants were recommended to restart therapy post-trial and were followed until May 2023. Clinical outcomes are reported in a non-randomized fashion from enrolment and from the end of the trial. The primary outcome was relapse defined as ≥10% reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction to <50%, doubling in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide to >400 ng/L, or clinical features of heart failure. From enrolment to the last follow-up (median 6 years, interquartile range 6-7), 33 of 51 patients (65%) relapsed. The 5-year relapse rate from enrolment was 61% (95% confidence interval [CI] 45-73) and from the end of the trial was 39% (95% CI 19-54). Of 20 patients who relapsed during the trial, nine had a recurrent relapse during follow-up. Thirteen relapsed for the first time after the trial; seven had restarted low intensity therapy, four had not restarted therapy and two did not have therapy withdrawn. The mean intensity of therapy was lower after the trial compared to enrolment (mean difference -6 [-8 to -4]; p < 0.001). One third of relapses during follow-up had identifiable triggers (arrhythmia [n = 4], pregnancy [n = 1], hypertension [n = 1], infection [n = 1]). Corrected atrial fibrillation was associated with reduced risk of relapse (hazard ratio 0.33, 95% CI 0.12-0.96; p = 0.042).ConclusionsThe risk of relapse in the 5 years following the TRED-HF trial remained high. Restarting lower doses of heart failure medications at the end of the trial, external triggers and disease progression are likely to have contributed to relapse.

Project description:BackgroundPatients with dilated cardiomyopathy whose symptoms and cardiac function have recovered often ask whether their medications can be stopped. The safety of withdrawing treatment in this situation is unknown.MethodsWe did an open-label, pilot, randomised trial to examine the effect of phased withdrawal of heart failure medications in patients with previous dilated cardiomyopathy who were now asymptomatic, whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) had improved from less than 40% to 50% or greater, whose left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) had normalised, and who had an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) concentration less than 250 ng/L. Patients were recruited from a network of hospitals in the UK, assessed at one centre (Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK), and randomly assigned (1:1) to phased withdrawal or continuation of treatment. After 6 months, patients in the continued treatment group had treatment withdrawn by the same method. The primary endpoint was a relapse of dilated cardiomyopathy within 6 months, defined by a reduction in LVEF of more than 10% and to less than 50%, an increase in LVEDV by more than 10% and to higher than the normal range, a two-fold rise in NT-pro-BNP concentration and to more than 400 ng/L, or clinical evidence of heart failure, at which point treatments were re-established. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02859311.FindingsBetween April 21, 2016, and Aug 22, 2017, 51 patients were enrolled. 25 were randomly assigned to the treatment withdrawal group and 26 to continue treatment. Over the first 6 months, 11 (44%) patients randomly assigned to treatment withdrawal met the primary endpoint of relapse compared with none of those assigned to continue treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 45·7% [95% CI 28·5-67·2]; p=0·0001). After 6 months, 25 (96%) of 26 patients assigned initially to continue treatment attempted its withdrawal. During the following 6 months, nine patients met the primary endpoint of relapse (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 36·0% [95% CI 20·6-57·8]). No deaths were reported in either group and three serious adverse events were reported in the treatment withdrawal group: hospital admissions for non-cardiac chest pain, sepsis, and an elective procedure.InterpretationMany patients deemed to have recovered from dilated cardiomyopathy will relapse following treatment withdrawal. Until robust predictors of relapse are defined, treatment should continue indefinitely.FundingBritish Heart Foundation, Alexander Jansons Foundation, Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London, Imperial College Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust, and Rosetrees Trust.

Project description:AimsThe aims of this paper were to investigate the analytical performance of the nine prognostic scales commonly used in heart failure (HF), in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), and to develop a unique prognostic model tailored to DCM patients.Methods and resultsThe hospital and outpatient records of 406 DCM patients were retrospectively analysed. The information on patient status was gathered after 48.2 ± 32.0 months. Tests were carried out to ascertain the prognostic accuracy in DCM using some of the most frequently applied HF prognostic scales (Barcelona Bio-Heart Failure, Candesartan in Heart Failure-Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and Morbidity, Studio della Streptochinasi nell'Infarto Miocardico-Heart Failure, Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure, Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic Heart Failure, MUerte Subita en Insuficiencia Cardiaca, Organized Program to Initiate Lifesaving Treatment in Hospitalized Patients With Heart Failure, Seattle Heart Failure Model) and one dedicated to DCM, that of Miura et al. At follow-up, 70 DCM patients (17.2%) died. Most analysed scores substantially overestimated the mortality risk, especially in survivors. The prognostic accuracy of the scales were suboptimal, varying between 60% and 80%, with the best performance from Barcelona Bio-Heart Failure and Seattle Heart Failure Model for 1-5 year mortality [areas under the receiver operating curve 0.792-0.890 (95% confidence interval 0.725-0.918) and 0.764-0.808 (95% confidence interval 0.682-0.934), respectively].Based on our accumulated data, a self-developed DCM prognostic model was constructed. The model consists of age, gender, body mass index, symptoms duration, New York Heart Association class, diabetes mellitus, prior stroke, abnormal liver function, dyslipidaemia, left bundle branch block, left ventricle end-diastolic diameter, ejection fraction, N terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide, haemoglobin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, and pharmacological and resynchronisation therapy. This newly created prognostic model outperformed the analysed HF scales.ConclusionsAn analysis of various HF prognostic models found them to be suboptimal for DCM patients. A self-developed DCM prognostic model showed improved performance over the nine other models studied. However, further validation of the prognostic model in different DCM populations is required.

Dataset Information

Family history of dilated cardiomyopathy among patients with heart failure from the HF-ACTION genetic ancillary study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Family history of dilated cardiomyopathy among patients with heart failure from the HF-ACTION genetic ancillary study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets