Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Time-of-Travel Methods for Measuring Optical Flow on Board a Micro Flying Robot.


ABSTRACT: For use in autonomous micro air vehicles, visual sensors must not only be small, lightweight and insensitive to light variations; on-board autopilots also require fast and accurate optical flow measurements over a wide range of speeds. Using an auto-adaptive bio-inspired Michaelis-Menten Auto-adaptive Pixel (M 2 APix) analog silicon retina, in this article, we present comparative tests of two optical flow calculation algorithms operating under lighting conditions from 6 × 10 - 7 to 1 . 6 × 10 - 2 W·cm - 2 (i.e., from 0.2 to 12,000 lux for human vision). Contrast "time of travel" between two adjacent light-sensitive pixels was determined by thresholding and by cross-correlating the two pixels' signals, with measurement frequency up to 5 kHz for the 10 local motion sensors of the M 2 APix sensor. While both algorithms adequately measured optical flow between 25 ∘ /s and 1000 ∘ /s, thresholding gave rise to a lower precision, especially due to a larger number of outliers at higher speeds. Compared to thresholding, cross-correlation also allowed for a higher rate of optical flow output (99 Hz and 1195 Hz, respectively) but required substantially more computational resources.

SUBMITTER: Vanhoutte E 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5375857 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Time-of-Travel Methods for Measuring Optical Flow on Board a Micro Flying Robot.

Vanhoutte Erik E   Mafrica Stefano S   Ruffier Franck F   Bootsma Reinoud J RJ   Serres Julien J  

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 20170311 3


For use in autonomous micro air vehicles, visual sensors must not only be small, lightweight and insensitive to light variations; on-board autopilots also require fast and accurate optical flow measurements over a wide range of speeds. Using an auto-adaptive bio-inspired Michaelis-Menten Auto-adaptive Pixel (M 2 APix) analog silicon retina, in this article, we present comparative tests of two optical flow calculation algorithms operating under lighting conditions from 6 × 10 - 7 to 1 . 6 × 10 -  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC6472402 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5514097 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1303822 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3018081 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC4038914 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5476806 | biostudies-literature
| PRJEB36968 | ENA
| S-EPMC8358828 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11203875 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10425329 | biostudies-literature