Dataset Information

Role of micronutrients in congestive heart failure: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

To assess the effect of micronutrients on health outcomes in patients with heart failure.

Materials and methods

Only randomized controlled trials testing the effectiveness of different micronutrients either singly or combined versus placebo in heart failure patients were included. We conducted a search in different databases such as Medline from PubMed, Embase and Scopus from Elsevier, and Google Scholar. The keywords used in the search were "Heart Failure" and its cognates, "Micronutrient," "Minerals," and names of individual micronutrients.

Results

Out of 3288 titles and abstracts reviewed, only 11 trials comprising 529 individuals were found to be appropriate to be included in the final review. It was found that micronutrients, either single or combined, improved the health outcomes of heart failure patients by improving exercise tolerance, functional capacity, left ventricular function, flow-dependent dilation, and inflammatory milieu, thereby improving the quality of life of health failure patients. Certain micronutrients also normalized endothelial dysfunction.

Conclusion

Overall, this systematic review found sufficient evidence to support a large-scale trial on micronutrient supplementation in patients with heart failure.

SUBMITTER: Kkeveetil CV

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5442906 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Oct-Dec

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Role of micronutrients in congestive heart failure: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Kkeveetil Chandini Valiyakizha CV Thomas Grace G Chander Sam Johnson Udaya SJU

Tzu chi medical journal 20161001 4

<h4>Objectives</h4>To assess the effect of micronutrients on health outcomes in patients with heart failure.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>Only randomized controlled trials testing the effectiveness of different micronutrients either singly or combined versus placebo in heart failure patients were included. We conducted a search in different databases such as Medline from PubMed, Embase and Scopus from Elsevier, and Google Scholar. The keywords used in the search were "Heart Failure" and its cogn ...[more]

PMID: 28757745

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background: Dyspnea is the most common presenting symptom among patients hospitalized for acute heart failure (AHF). Dyspnea relief constitutes a clinically relevant therapeutic target and endpoint for clinical trials and regulatory approval. However, there have been no widely accepted dyspnea measurement standards in AHF. By systematic review and mapping the current evidence of the applied scales, timing, and results of measurement, we hope to provide some new insights and recommendations for dyspnea measurement. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception until August 27, 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with dyspnea severity measured as the endpoint in patients with AHF were included. Results: Out of a total of 63 studies, 28 had dyspnea as the primary endpoint. The Likert scale (34, 54%) and visual analog scale (VAS) (22, 35%) were most widely used for dyspnea assessment. Among the 43 studies with detailed results, dyspnea was assessed most frequently on days 1, 2, 3, and 6 h after randomization or drug administration. Compared with control groups, better dyspnea relief was observed in the experimental groups in 21 studies. Only four studies that assessed tolvaptan compared with control on the proportion of dyspnea improvement met the criteria for meta-analyses, which did not indicate beneficial effect of dyspnea improvement on day 1 (RR: 1.16; 95% CI: 0.99-1.37; p = 0.07; I 2 = 61%). Conclusion: The applied scales, analytical approaches, and timing of measurement are in diversity, which has impeded the comprehensive evaluation of clinical efficacy of potential therapies managing dyspnea in patients with AHF. Developing a more general measurement tool established on the unified unidimensional scales, standardized operation protocol to record the continuation, and clinically significant difference of dyspnea variation may be a promising approach. In addition, to evaluate the effect of experimental therapies on dyspnea more precisely, the screening time and blinded assessment are factors that need to be considered.

Project description:BackgroundHeart failure hospitalization (hHF) with dipeptyl-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) remains at the center stage since the publication of Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus - Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (SAVOR-TIMI) in 2013 showing significant increase with saxagliptin, compared to placebo. This outcome led to additional label of hHF to both saxagliptin and alogliptin in April 2016 and eventual labelling of hHF to all the four approved DPP-4Is in United States in August 2017, by US Food Drug Administration. To note, neither Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS), nor Cardiovascular and Renal Microvascular Outcome Study with Linagliptin (CARMELINA), showed any signals of hHF with these two agents. These developments have seriously generated an uncertainty among clinicians with regards to hHF effect of DPP-4Is in type 2 diabetic patients with high risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease.Aims and objectivesWe systematically searched the database of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and International conference presentation from the inception up to October 25, 2018 using MeSH and specific key words. We retrieved all those studies that explicitly looked for hHF as a prespecified end point and were conducted for ≥52 weeks. Subsequently, we conducted the meta-analysis using comprehensive meta-analysis software Version 3, using different sensitivity analysis to study the effect of DPP-4Is on hHF in both dedicated CV outcome trials as well as randomized controlled trials.ResultsThe meta-analysis of four exclusive dedicated CV outcome trials (N = 43,522) did not find significant increase in hHF with DPP-4 inhibitors (Fixed model Relative Risk [RR] 1.06; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.96-1.17; P = 0.25; I2: 53.95%, tau2: 0.012, P = 0.089). Meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that explicitly looked for hHF for ≥52 weeks (N = 48,199) also did not show any significant increase in hHF (fixed model peto odds ratio 1.05; 95% CI 0.95-1.15, P = 0.36; I2: 43.74%, tau2: 0.016, P = 0.10).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis suggests no significant increase in hHF with DPP-4 inhibitors, although a nonsignificant heterogeneity across the trials might limit this observation.

Project description:BackgroundHeart failure is the end stage of all cardiovascular diseases, which brings a heavy burden to the global health network. Arotinolol, as a new type of β Receptor blocker, has a good antihypertensive effect. Many clinical trials have observed the clinical efficacy of arotinolol in the treatment of essential hypertension. However, so far, there has been no systematic evaluation on the efficacy and safety of arotinolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure.ObjectiveThe purpose of this review was to systematically evaluate the clinical efficacy of arotinolol in patients with chronic heart failure.MethodsRandomized controlled trials (RCTs) of arotinolol in the treatment of chronic heart failure were retrieved from seven databases according to the Cochrane manual, including CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wan fang database, VIP database, PubMed, Sinomed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases. The main outcomes were the effective rate, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), blood pressure, heart rate, cardiac index, stroke volume (SV), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (Hs-CRP), left ventricular end diastolic volume (LVEDV), left ventricular end diastolic diameter (LVEDD), and adverse events (AEs).ResultsA total of 17 trials met the qualification criteria, which included 1,717 patients with heart failure. Most trials had uncertain risks in terms of random sequence generation, allocation hiding, patient loss, and result evaluation. Meta analysis showed that arotinolol significantly improved the treatment efficiency of patients with heart failure (standardized mean difference (SMD) = 4.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) [2.89, 5.72], p = 0.00, I 2 = 0), LVEF (SMD = 1.59, 95% CI [0.99, 2.19], p = 0.000 0, I 2 = 95.8%), cardiac index (SMD = 0.32, 95% CI [0.11, 0.53], p = 0.03), I 2 = 0), SV (SMD = 2.00, 95% CI [1.57, 2.34], p = 0.000, I 2 = 64.2%), lower BNP (SMD = -0.804, 95% CI [-0.97, -0.64], p = 0.000, I 2 = 94.4%), and LVEDV (SMD = -0.25, 95% CI [-0.45, -0.05], p = 0.015, I 2 = 0). There was no statistical significance for blood pressure (SMDsystolic pressure = -0.09, 95% CI [-0.69, 0.51], p = 0.775, I 2 systolic pressure = 90.2%; SMDdiastolic pressure = -0.16, 95% CI [-0.79, 0.48], P = 0.632, I 2 diastolic pressure = 91.2%), heart rate (SMD = -0.12, 95% CI [-1.00, 0.75], P = 0.787, I 2 = 96.1%), Hs-CRP (SMD = -1.52, 95% CI [-3.43, 0.40], P = 0.121, I 2 = 98.3%), and LVEDD (SMD = -0.07, 95% CI [-0.90, 0.76], P = 0.870, I 2 = 96.5%).ConclusionArotinolol can safely and effectively improve the effective rate of patients with chronic heart failure, increase LVEF, increase CI and SV, and reduce BNP and LVEDV. However, because of the low overall quality of the included randomized controlled trials, these findings need to be considered carefully. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed for further verification, to provide a more scientific basis for the safety and effectiveness of arotinolol in the clinical treatment of heart failure.Systematic review registration[https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=371214], identifier [CRD:420223371214].

Project description:BackgroundShengmai injection (SMI) is made from purified ginseng, Radix Ophiopogonis, and Schisandra chinensis. It has cardiotonic effects and is clinically used for the adjuvant treatment of chronic heart failure (CHF). However, its efficacy and safety are uncertain. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the existing efficacy and safety evidence in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that studied SMI for the treatment of CHF.MethodsPubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, and CBM databases were searched up to September 10, 2019. RCTs that compared basic Western medicine treatment with SMI + basic Western medicine were included. The Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool was used to assess the risk of bias in the RCTs. The meta-analysis used the random effects model; the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined using the inverse variance method, and the Mantel-Haenszel method was used to combine the relative risk (RR) and 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 and Q tests, and the source of heterogeneity was explored by analyzing three preset subgroup hypotheses.ResultsA total of 20 RCTs were included (n = 1562), with a moderate-to-high risk of bias. The meta-analysis showed that, compared with Western medicine alone, SMI adjuvant therapy significantly improved cardiac function indicators, including left ventricular ejection fraction (MD 6.8%, 95% CI 4.68 to 8.91), stroke volume (MD 9.81 ml, 95% CI 5.67 to 13.96), cardiac output (MD 0.96 L/min, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.25), and cardiac index (MD 0.53 L/min, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.70); heterogeneity was generally high among these outcomes. Compared with the controls, patients receiving SMI adjuvant therapy also had a higher response to treatment (RR 2.89, 95% CI 2.10 to 3.99; I2 = 0%), a greater decrease in brain natriuretic peptide levels (MD -284.66 ng/l, 95% CI -353.73 to -215.59, I2 = 0%), and a greater increase in six-minute walk test performance (MD 70.67 m, 95% CI 22.92 to 118.42; I2 = 84%). Nine studies reported mild adverse events, such as gastrointestinal reactions, and no serious adverse events were reported.ConclusionCurrently, available evidence indicates that SMI, as an adjuvant for basic Western medicine treatment, can improve the cardiac function of patients with CHF with good safety outcomes. Because of the high risk of bias among the included RCTs and the large heterogeneity of partial outcomes, the findings of this study must be verified by high-quality studies with large sample sizes.

Dataset Information

Role of micronutrients in congestive heart failure: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Objectives

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Role of micronutrients in congestive heart failure: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets