Dataset Information

Expression of PD-L1 and prognosis in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT: The associations between programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and the prognosis of various cancers have always been a research topic of considerable interest. However, the prognostic value of PD-L1 in breast cancer patients remains a controversial subject. We aimed to assess the association between PD-L1 protein expression and clinicopathological features and the impact of this relationship on breast cancer survival. We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases to determine the correlations among PD-L1 expression, clinicopathological features and overall survival (OS). A total of 5 studies containing 2,546 cases were included in the analysis. The combined hazard ratio (HR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI) for OS were 1.76 (95% CI 1.09-2.82; P=0.02) for patients with tumors exhibiting PD-L1 overexpression. The pooled odds ratios (ORs) indicated that PD-L1 expression was associated with positive lymph node metastasis, higher histological grades, estrogen receptor (ER)-negativity, and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Our findings indicate that PD-L1 expression is a promising biomarker for the prognosis of breast cancer, and may be helpful to clinicians aiming to select the appropriate immunotherapy for breast cancer.

SUBMITTER: Zhang M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5458212 | biostudies-literature | 2017 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Expression of PD-L1 and prognosis in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Zhang Minghui M Sun Houbin H Zhao Shu S Wang Yan Y Pu Haihong H Wang Yan Y Zhang Qingyuan Q

Oncotarget 20170501 19

The associations between programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) and the prognosis of various cancers have always been a research topic of considerable interest. However, the prognostic value of PD-L1 in breast cancer patients remains a controversial subject. We aimed to assess the association between PD-L1 protein expression and clinicopathological features and the impact of this relationship on breast cancer survival. We performed a systematic search of the PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library ...[more]

PMID: 28430626

Similar Datasets

Project description:OBJECTIVE:To evaluate the relative efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors versus conventional drugs in patients with cancer that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. DESIGN:Meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. DATA SOURCES:PubMed, Embase, Cochrane database, and conference abstracts presented at the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society of Medical Oncology up to March 2018. REVIEW METHODS:Studies of PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors (avelumab, atezolizumab, durvalumab, nivolumab, and pembrolizumab) that had available hazard ratios for death based on PD-L1 positivity or negativity were included. The threshold for PD-L1 positivity or negativity was that PD-L1 stained cell accounted for 1% of tumour cells, or tumour and immune cells, assayed by immunohistochemistry staining methods. RESULTS:4174 patients with advanced or metastatic cancers from eight randomised controlled trials were included in this study. Compared with conventional agents, PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors were associated with significantly prolonged overall survival in both patients that were PD-L1 positive (n=2254, hazard ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.59 to 0.74) and PD-L1 negative (1920, 0.80, 0.71 to 0.90). However, the efficacies of PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade treatment in patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative were significantly different (P=0.02 for interaction). Additionally, in both patients that were PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative, the long term clinical benefits from PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade were observed consistently across interventional agent, cancer histotype, method of randomisation stratification, type of immunohistochemical scoring system, drug target, type of control group, and median follow-up time. CONCLUSIONS:PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy is a preferable treatment option over conventional therapy for both patients that are PD-L1 positive and PD-L1 negative. This finding suggests that PD-L1 expression status alone is insufficient in determining which patients should be offered PD-1 or PD-L1 blockade therapy.

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors play a vital role in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) immunotherapy. A recent study showed that chemokine-like factor (CKLF)-like MARVEL transmembrane domain containing 6 (CMTM6) has a crucial role in programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) stability. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between CMTM6 and PD-L1 in TNBC and the association with clinical characteristics.MethodsA total of 143 patients, including 75 with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-driven breast cancer and 68 with TNBC, were included in this study. In 83 paired primary breast cancers (PBCs) and metastatic breast cancers (MBC) comprising 45 HER2-driven breast cancers and 38 TNBC, CMTM6 and PD-L1 were detected based on immunohistochemistry (IHC) with FFPE tissues. Another 60 PBCs comprising 30 HER2-driven breast cancers and 30 TNBC in order to detect CMTM6 and PD-L1 mRNA expressions based on real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) using frozen tissues. Furthermore, 153 patients comprising 30 TNBC and 123 HER2-driven breast cancer based on The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database were used to confirm the difference mRNA expression.ResultsThe expression of CMTM6 in patients with TNBC was significantly higher than in those with HER2-driven PBC (IHC, P=0.036, mRNA, P=0.036, TCGA dataset, P=0.039). CMTM6 was correlated with PD-L1 based on IHC in triple-negative MBC (P=0.004); the same result was found based on mRNA data in triple- negative PBC (P=0.021). Moreover, a high expression of CMTM6 in TNBC was associated with poor progression-free survival (PFS) (P=0.030, 95% CI: 1.08-4.57, HR =2.22). After multiple Cox regression analysis, CMTM6 in TNBC emerged as an independent risk factor for PFS (P=0.027, 95% CI: 1.11-5.20, HR =2.40). The expression of PD-L1 was negatively correlated with lymph node metastasis (P=0.026) and was not associated with PFS.ConclusionsThe expression of CMTM6 was higher in TNBC than in HER2-driven breast cancer. In TNBC, CMTM6 was correlated with PD-L1 expression, and potentially could be used as an independent risk factor for predicting PFS.

Project description:BackgroundInhibitors of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand 1(PD-L1) checkpoint have been approved for metastatic triple negative breast cancer (mTNBC) in patients positive for PD-L1 expression. Negative results from the recent phase III trials (IMPassion131 and IMPassion132) have raises questions on the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors and the predictive value of PD-L1 expression. Here we attempt to systematically analyze the biomarker value of PD-L1 expression for predicting the response of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in mTNBC.Materials and methodsPubMed database was searched until Dec 2021 for studies evaluating PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors plus/minus chemotherapy in mTNBC. Outcome of interest included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4. was used for data-analysis.ResultsIn total, 20 clinical trials comprising 3962 mTNBC patients (ICT: 2665 (67%); CT: 1297 (33%) were included in this study. Overall ORR was 22% (95%CI, 14-30%) and significant improvement was observed for PD-L1+ patients (ORR 1.78 [95%CI, 1.45-2.19], p<0.00001) as compared to PD-L1- cohort. Pooled outcome also indicated a significant 1-year PFS and 2-year OS advantage for patients with PD-L1 expression (1-year PFS: ORR 1.39 [95%CI, 1.04-1.85], p=0.02; I2 = 0%; 2-year OS: (ORR 2.47 [95%CI, 1.30-4.69], p=0.006; I2 = 63%). Subgroup analysis indicated that PD-L1 expression can successfully predict tumor response and 2-year OS benefit in mTNBC patients regardless of the type of investigating agent, line of treatment administration, and to some extent the type of treatment. Biomarker ability of PD-L1 expression to predict 1-year PFS was slightly better with pembrolizumab (p=0.09) than atezolizumab (p=0.18), and significantly better when treatment was administered in the first-line setting (OR 1.38 [95%CI, 1.02-1.87], p=0.04) and chemotherapy was added (OR 1.38 [95%CI, 1.02-1.86], p=0.03). Immune-related toxicity of any grade and grade≥3 was 39% (95%CI, 26%-52%) and 10% (95%CI, 8%-13%), respectively.ConclusionsPD-L1 expression can predict objective response rate and 2-year OS in mTNBC patients receiving PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors. One-year PFS is also predicted in selected patients. PD-L1 expression can be a useful biomarker of efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors in mTNBC.

Dataset Information

Expression of PD-L1 and prognosis in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Publications

Expression of PD-L1 and prognosis in breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets