Dataset Information

ESR and CRP are useful between stages of 2-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are important tests in the initial diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Many surgeons also use these tests to determine if infection has resolved between stages of a 2-stage procedure, but little data exist regarding this practice.

Methods

A retrospective review of our institutional total joint databases was conducted to determine sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of elevated ESR and/or CRP to diagnose persistent infection between stages.

Results

Among 16 knees and 5 hips, sensitivity was 50% for CRP, 75% for ESR, and 100% when combined. The negative predictive value of persistent infection was 100% when neither test was elevated.

Conclusions

Results of this study support the use of CRP and ESR as indicators of the resolution of periprosthetic joint infection between stages of 2-stage revision.

SUBMITTER: Lindsay CP

PROVIDER: S-EPMC5585765 | biostudies-literature | 2017 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

ESR and CRP are useful between stages of 2-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection.

Lindsay Christopher P CP Olcott Christopher W CW Del Gaizo Daniel J DJ

Arthroplasty today 20170204 3

<h4>Background</h4>Serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and C-reactive protein (CRP) are important tests in the initial diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection. Many surgeons also use these tests to determine if infection has resolved between stages of a 2-stage procedure, but little data exist regarding this practice.<h4>Methods</h4>A retrospective review of our institutional total joint databases was conducted to determine sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of elevated E ...[more]

PMID: 28913404

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the relative performance of clinical readouts including serum C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), globulin (GLB) levels, the albumin to GLB ratio (A/G), and the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) when diagnosing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).MethodsClinical data was collected from 115 individuals diagnosed in our department between January 2017 and December 2020 with either chronic PJI (29 female, 24 male; median age 71.00 years [range, 41-94 years]) or aseptic loosening (30 female, 32 male; median age 68.50 years [range, 34-85 years]). Patient demographic data were compared, and the relative sensitivity and specificity of preoperative GLB, ESR, CRP, NLR, and A/G values as predictors of PJI diagnosis were assessed.ResultsMedian globulin levels in the PJI and aseptic groups were 31.700 g/L (interquartile range [IQR], 28.400-35.300) and 26.600 g/L (IQR, 24.375-30.550), respectively (p < 0.001). The median A/G values in the PJI and aseptic groups were 1.150 (IQR, 0.960-1.255) and 1.510 (IQR, 1.265-1.670), respectively (p < 0.001). The median NLR values in the PJI and aseptic groups were 2.510 (IQR, 1.900-3.335) and 1.850 (IQR, 1.425 to 2.362), respectively (p < 0.001). The median ESR values in the PJI and aseptic groups were 53.000 mm/h (IQR, 35.000-76.500) and 16.000 mm/h (IQR, 7.000-33.000), respectively (p < 0.001). Median CRP levels in the PJI and aseptic groups were 24.890 mg/L (IQR, 10.595-54.095) and 2.245 mg/L (IQR, 0.865-8.6075), respectively (p < 0.001). Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) values for CRP, ESR, GLB, A/G, and NLR were 0.841 (95% confidence interval, 0.761-0.903), 0.850 (0.771-0.910), 0.747 (0.658-0.824), 0.779 (0.692-0.851), and 0.708 (0.616-0.789), respectively. When GLB > 26.6 g/L, A/G < 1.32, and NLR > 2.1 were utilized as threshold values to diagnose PJI, GLB and A/G were found to exhibit superior sensitivity (90.57%, 81.13%) to that observed for CRP (71.70%) and ESR (79.25%), but the specificity of these two metrics (GLB: 51.61%, A/G: 72.58%) was significantly reduced relative to that for CRP (87.10%) or ESR (75.81%). ROC analyses further revealed that NLR did not exhibit significant advantages in sensitivity (73.58%) or specificity (70.97%) relative to CRP or ESR.ConclusionGlobulin levels, NLR values, and A/G values do not outperform ESR or CRP levels when used to diagnose PJI.

Project description:ObjectivesA periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a significant complication after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Still there is no agreement on a perfect diagnosis and treatment algorithm. The aim of this study was to evaluate the success and revision rates after two-stage revision total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and factors that affect the success rate.Material and methods50 consecutive two-stage revision TKAs were performed between January 2011 and December 2012. We retrospectively reviewed study patient's charts including demographics, prior surgeries, comorbidities, incidence of persistent infection and revisions. At the final follow-up examination the patient's satisfaction, pain level and disorders were evaluated. A successful clinical outcome was defined as a functioning prosthesis without wound healing disorders, no sinuses tracts or other clinical evidence of a persistent infection. Results : Re-implantation of prosthesis was performed in 47 cases; three patients received a septic arthrodesis. Twelve patients had a persistent infection despite two-stage re-implantation resulting in a success rate of 76.0%. In eight of these twelve patients an infecting germ was isolated during second-stage procedure. Three patients received another two-stage revision arthroplasty and one patient an above knee amputation. A revision was performed in 23 of 50 patients (46.0%). Factors that diminish the success rate were further operations after primary TKA (p = 0.048), prior revision arthroplasties after TKA (p = 0.045), nicotine abuse (p = 0.048), Charlson comorbidity index above a score of 2 (p = 0.031) and a mixed flora during first-stage procedure (p < 0.001). Age, sex, immune status, chronic anticoagulant use, rheumatoid arthritis, body mass index and the presence of multidrug resistant germs showed no significant effect on success rate (p > 0.05). Conclusion : We found that patients who required surgery after the primary TKA, had a higher Charlson comorbidity index or were found to have mixed flora during explantation. The treatment of PJI remains difficult, both for the patient and for the treating surgeons.

Project description:Background Two-stage revision arthroplasty is the gold standard for treating chronic prosthetic joint infection (PJI), but there has been limited analysis of the costs incurred beyond the index procedure and how additional complications and/or surgeries impact the cost of care. Methods The electronic health record was queried for patients who underwent a total hip arthroplasty complicated by PJI and then underwent removal of the prosthesis with implantation of an antibiotic-impregnated articulating cement spacer. Patient demographics, surgical variables, hospital readmissions, emergency department (ED) visits, and postoperative complications were recorded. Data on total costs were collected with an internal accounting database. The average follow-up duration was 3.35 years. Results Univariate analyses showed statistically significant differences between outcome groups (reimplantation, reimplantation requiring later revision, retained spacer, and Girdlestone resection arthroplasty) in total overall costs, ED visit costs, and postoperative costs at 1 and 2 years after the initial spacer placement. The median total cost at 2 years for each group was $38,865 ($29,144-49,471) (reimplantation), $79,223 ($53,442-100,152) (reimplantation with revision), $54,096 ($20,872-73,903) (retained spacer), $62,134 ($52,135-101,546) (Girdlestone). Patients who underwent successful reimplantation requiring no further surgery had significantly lower total costs than patients who needed revision surgeries after reimplantation ($38,865 [$29,144-49,471] vs $79,223 [$53,442-100,152], P = .007). Patients with a Girdlestone resection arthroplasty had higher total costs at 1 year ($59,708 [$41,781-80,916] vs $33,093 [$27,237-40,429], P = .043) and higher costs attributable to ED visits at 2 years than the reimplantation group ($23,581 [$14,029-41,519] vs $15,307 [$6291-29,119], P = .009). Conclusions A significant variation exists among total costs for the 2-stage treatment of hip PJI when stratified by the final outcome.

Dataset Information

ESR and CRP are useful between stages of 2-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

ESR and CRP are useful between stages of 2-stage revision for periprosthetic joint infection.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets