Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
When a clinical treatment fails or shows suboptimal results, the question of when to switch to another treatment arises. Treatment switching strategies are often dynamic because the time of switching depends on the evolution of an individual's time-varying covariates. Dynamic strategies can be directly compared in randomized trials. For example, HIV-infected individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy could be randomized to switching therapy within 90 days of HIV-1 RNA crossing above a threshold of either 400 copies/ml (tight-control strategy) or 1000 copies/ml (loose-control strategy).Methods
We review an approach to emulate a randomized trial of dynamic switching strategies using observational data from the Antiretroviral Therapy Cohort Collaboration, the Centers for AIDS Research Network of Integrated Clinical Systems and the HIV-CAUSAL Collaboration. We estimated the comparative effect of tight-control vs. loose-control strategies on death and AIDS or death via inverse-probability weighting.Results
Of 43 803 individuals who initiated an eligible antiretroviral therapy regimen in 2002 or later, 2001 met the baseline inclusion criteria for the mortality analysis and 1641 for the AIDS or death analysis. There were 21 deaths and 33 AIDS or death events in the tight-control group, and 28 deaths and 41 AIDS or death events in the loose-control group. Compared with tight control, the adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for loose control were 1.10 (0.73, 1.66) for death, and 1.04 (0.86, 1.27) for AIDS or death.Conclusions
Although our effective sample sizes were small and our estimates imprecise, the described methodological approach can serve as an example for future analyses.
SUBMITTER: Cain LE
PROVIDER: S-EPMC5841611 | biostudies-literature | 2016 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Cain Lauren E LE Saag Michael S MS Petersen Maya M May Margaret T MT Ingle Suzanne M SM Logan Roger R Robins James M JM Abgrall Sophie S Shepherd Bryan E BE Deeks Steven G SG John Gill M M Touloumi Giota G Vourli Georgia G Dabis François F Vandenhende Marie-Anne MA Reiss Peter P van Sighem Ard A Samji Hasina H Hogg Robert S RS Rybniker Jan J Sabin Caroline A CA Jose Sophie S Del Amo Julia J Moreno Santiago S Rodríguez Benigno B Cozzi-Lepri Alessandro A Boswell Stephen L SL Stephan Christoph C Pérez-Hoyos Santiago S Jarrin Inma I Guest Jodie L JL D'Arminio Monforte Antonella A Antinori Andrea A Moore Richard R Campbell Colin Nj CN Casabona Jordi J Meyer Laurence L Seng Rémonie R Phillips Andrew N AN Bucher Heiner C HC Egger Matthias M Mugavero Michael J MJ Haubrich Richard R Geng Elvin H EH Olson Ashley A Eron Joseph J JJ Napravnik Sonia S Kitahata Mari M MM Van Rompaey Stephen E SE Teira Ramón R Justice Amy C AC Tate Janet P JP Costagliola Dominique D Sterne Jonathan Ac JA Hernán Miguel A MA
International journal of epidemiology 20161201 6
<h4>Background</h4>When a clinical treatment fails or shows suboptimal results, the question of when to switch to another treatment arises. Treatment switching strategies are often dynamic because the time of switching depends on the evolution of an individual's time-varying covariates. Dynamic strategies can be directly compared in randomized trials. For example, HIV-infected individuals receiving antiretroviral therapy could be randomized to switching therapy within 90 days of HIV-1 RNA crossi ...[more]