Unknown

Dataset Information

0

How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes.


ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE:To assess the reliability of ADC measurements in vitro and in cervical lymph nodes of healthy volunteers. METHODS:We used a GE 1.5 T MRI scanner and a first ice-water phantom according to recommendations released by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) for assessing ADC against reference values. We analysed the target size effect by using a second phantom made of six inserted spheres with diameters ranging from 10 to 37 mm. Thirteen healthy volunteers were also scanned to assess the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of volumetric ADC measurements of cervical lymph nodes. RESULTS:On the ice-water phantom, the error in ADC measurements was less than 4.3 %. The spatial bias due to the non-linearity of gradient fields was found to be 24 % at 8 cm from the isocentre. ADC measure reliability decreased when addressing small targets due to partial volume effects (up to 12.8 %). The mean ADC value of cervical lymph nodes was 0.87.10-3 ± 0.12.10-3 mm2/s with a good intra-observer reliability. Inter-observer reproducibility featured a bias of -5.5 % due to segmentation issues. CONCLUSION:ADC is a potentially important imaging biomarker in oncology; however, variability issues preclude its broader adoption. Reliable use of ADC requires technical advances and systematic quality control. KEY POINTS:• ADC is a promising quantitative imaging biomarker. • ADC has a fair inter-reader variability and good intra-reader variability. • Partial volume effect, post-processing software and non-linearity of scanners are limiting factors. • No threshold values for detecting cervical lymph node malignancy can be drawn.

SUBMITTER: Moreau B 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6028847 | biostudies-literature | 2018 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

How reliable are ADC measurements? A phantom and clinical study of cervical lymph nodes.

Moreau Bastien B   Iannessi Antoine A   Hoog Christopher C   Beaumont Hubert H  

European radiology 20180223 8


<h4>Objective</h4>To assess the reliability of ADC measurements in vitro and in cervical lymph nodes of healthy volunteers.<h4>Methods</h4>We used a GE 1.5 T MRI scanner and a first ice-water phantom according to recommendations released by the Quantitative Imaging Biomarker Alliance (QIBA) for assessing ADC against reference values. We analysed the target size effect by using a second phantom made of six inserted spheres with diameters ranging from 10 to 37 mm. Thirteen healthy volunteers were  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4484291 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5543683 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC11788199 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10240307 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5757373 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6042416 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4412401 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8997164 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11885136 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7174777 | biostudies-literature