Editorial on comparison between stereotactic body radiotherapy and surgery in early stage NCSLC by Scotti et al.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Yamashita H
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6424768 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Editorial on comparison between stereotactic body radiotherapy and surgery in early stage NCSLC by Scotti <i>et al</i>.
Journal of thoracic disease 20190301 Suppl 3
Similar Datasets
Project description:Objective: To compare the risk of death, tumor recurrence, metastasis, and disease progression in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with thoracoscopic surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Methods: Patients who underwent radical surgery and SBRT for NSCLC between April 2010 and November 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney U and Chi-square test, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves were used to evaluate the survival outcomes of each patient group. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses were performed to estimate the risk of death, tumor recurrence, metastasis, and disease progression. Results: A total of 167 patients were enrolled, of whom 75 and 92 underwent SBRT and surgery, respectively. The median follow-up was 45 months (range, 4-105 months). SBRT patients were observed to be significantly older (median, 76.0 vs 67.0 years; P < .001), and associated with significantly higher mortality rate (42.7% vs 26.1%, P = .024). However, no significant difference in overall survival duration was seen between the SBRT and surgery groups (45.0 vs 41.0 months; P = .199). SBRT patients demonstrated significantly lower rates of metastasis (12.0% vs 30.4%, P = .004), and significantly longer metastasis-free survival (39.0 months vs 35.5 months, P = .020). The remaining outcomes, including tumor recurrence and disease progression rates, were similar between the groups. Compared to surgery, SBRT did not significantly associate with death, recurrence, or disease progression. Kaplan-Meier curves showed significant differences in overall, tumor recurrence-free, and disease progression-free survival between the groups (log-rank P < .05). Conclusions: SBRT demonstrated similar overall survival compared to radical surgery, and associated with significantly reduced risk of tumor metastasis. Our study thereby suggests SBRT as the best treatment option for patients with inoperable NSCLC.
| S-EPMC10880525 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the overall survival of patients with operable stage IA non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who undergo "early" SBRT (within 0-30 days after diagnosis) versus "delayed" surgery (90-120 days after diagnosis).Summary of background dataDuring the COVID-19 pandemic, national guidelines have recommended patients with operable stage IA NSCLC to consider delaying surgery by at least 3 months or, alternatively, to undergo SBRT without delay. It is unknown which strategy is associated with better short- and long-term outcomes.MethodsMultivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling and propensity score-matched analysis was used to compare the overall survival of patients with stage IA NSCLC in the National Cancer Data Base from 2004 to 2015 who underwent "early" SBRT (0-30 days after diagnosis) versus that of patients who underwent "delayed" wedge resection (90-120 days after diagnosis).ResultsDuring the study period, 570 (55%) patients underwent early SBRT and 475 (45%) underwent delayed wedge resection. In multivariable analysis, delayed resection was associated with improved survival [adjusted hazard ratio 0.61; (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.50-0.76)]. Propensity-score matching was used to create 2 groups of 279 patients each who received early SBRT or delayed resection that were well-matched with regard to baseline characteristics. The 5-year survival associated with delayed resection was 53% (95% CI: 45%-61%) which was better than the 5-year survival associated with early SBRT (31% [95% CI: 24%-37%]).ConclusionIn this national analysis, for patients with stage IA NSCLC, extended delay of surgery was associated with improved survival when compared to early treatment with SBRT.
| S-EPMC7668323 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportancePrevious comparisons of surgery and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for early-stage (ES) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) did not account for the extent of regional lymph node examination (LNE) during surgery.ObjectiveTo compare long-term overall survival (OS) of patients with ES NSCLC after surgery vs SBRT when the extent of regional LNE in patients undergoing surgery is thoroughly considered.Design, setting, and participantsCohort study with survival comparisons using the multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and after propensity score matching. Data from the National Cancer Database were analyzed from October 28, 2018, through April 18, 2019. Patients with ES NSCLC diagnosed between January 1, 2004, and December 31, 2015, who underwent any curative-intent surgery or SBRT were included.Main outcomes and measuresLong-term OS.ResultsOf 104 709 total patients, 91 330 underwent surgery (42 508 [46.5%] male; median [interquartile range] age, 68 [61-75] years) and 13 379 received SBRT (6065 [45.3%] male; median [interquartile range] age, 75 [68-81] years). Surgery, especially lobectomy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.53; 95% CI, 0.50-0.56), and regional LNE, especially when more than 10 lymph nodes were examined (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.69-0.77), were associated with better long-term OS (P < .001). Pneumonectomy was not associated with reduced mortality risk when 0 nodes were examined (HR for stage T1, 1.43; 95% CI, 0.67-3.06; P = .35; HR for stage T2-T3, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.34-1.13; P = .12) or when more than 15 nodes were examined for stage T1 disease in patients younger than 80 years (HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.54-1.09; P = .14) or when patients aged 80 years or older received regional LNE of any extent (>15 nodes examined: HR for stage T1, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.16-2.64; P = .54; HR for stage T2-T3, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.50-1.60; P = .71). Less extensive surgery was not associated with improved OS when 0 nodes were examined in patients aged 80 years or older with stage T2 to T3 tumors (HR for lobectomy, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.65-1.25; P = .53) and in selected operable patients older than 75 years with stage T1 tumors (HR for lobectomy, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.57-2.00; P = .84).Conclusions and relevanceThis study found that, overall, surgery coupled with regional LNE of appropriate extent was associated with the best long-term OS in patients with ES NSCLC.
| S-EPMC6902813 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Radiotherapy is an essential treatment modality for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is the standard treatment for early-stage NSCLC because of its favorable local control (LC) compared to conventional radiotherapy. Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a kind of external beam radiotherapy characterized by a steeper dose distribution and higher biological effectiveness. Several prospective studies have shown favorable outcomes. However, there is no direct comparison study between CIRT and SBRT to determine their benefits in the management of early-stage NSCLC. Thus, we conducted a retrospective, single-institutional, and contemporaneous comparison study, including propensity score-adjusted analyses, to clarify the differences in oncologic outcomes. The 3-year overall survival (OS) was 80.1% in CIRT and 71.6% in SBRT (p = 0.0077). The 3-year LC was 87.7% in the CIRT group and 79.1% in the SBRT group (p = 0.037). Multivariable analyses showed favorable OS and LC in the CIRT group (hazard risk [HR] = 0.41, p = 0.047; HR = 0.30, p = 0.040, respectively). Log-rank tests after propensity score matching and Cox regression analyses using propensity score confirmed these results. These data provided a positive efficacy profile of CIRT for early-stage NSCLC.
| S-EPMC7825544 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionIn patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who present with multiple pulmonary nodules, it is often difficult to distinguish metastatic disease from synchronous primary lung cancers (SPLC). We sought to evaluate clinical outcomes after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) alone to synchronous primary lesions.Material and methodsPatients with synchronous AJCC 8th Edition Stage IA-IIA NSCLC and treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) to all lesions between 2009-2018 were reviewed. SPLC was defined as patients having received two courses of SBRT within 180 days for treatment of separate early stage tumors. In total, 36 patients with 73 lesions were included. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), cumulative incidence of local failure (LF), and regional/distant failure (R/DF) were estimated and compared with a control cohort of solitary early stage NSCLC patients.ResultsMedian PFS was 38.8 months (95% CI 14.3-not reached [NR]); 3-year PFS rates were 50.6% (35.6-72.1). Median OS was 45.9 months (95% CI: 35.9-NR); 3-year OS was 63.0% (47.4-83.8). Three-year cumulative incidence of LF and R/DF was 6.6% (3.7-13.9) and 35.7% (19.3-52.1), respectively. Patients with SPLC were compared to a control group (n = 272) of patients treated for a solitary early stage NSCLC. There was no statistically significant difference in PFS (p = .91) or OS (p = .43). Evaluation of the patterns of failure showed a trend for worse cumulative incidence of R/DF in SPLC patients as compared to solitary early stage NSCLC (p = .06).ConclusionSBRT alone to multiple lung tumors with SPLC results in comparable PFS, OS, and LF rates to a cohort of patients treated for solitary early stage NSCLC. Those with SPLC had non-significantly higher R/DF. Patients with SPLC should be followed closely for failure and possible salvage therapy.
| S-EPMC8996167 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) has a role as definitive therapy in many tumor sites; however, its role in the treatment of breast cancer is less well explored. Currently, SABR has been investigated in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting with a number of ongoing feasibility studies. However, its use comes with a number of radiobiological and technical challenges that require further evaluation. We have learned much from other extracranial disease sites such as lung, brain, and spine, where definitive treatment with SABR has shown encouraging outcomes. In women with breast cancer, SABR may eliminate the need for invasive surgery, reducing healthcare costs and hospital stays and providing an additional curative option for early-stage disease. This poses the following question: is there a role for SABR as a definitive therapy in breast cancer?
| S-EPMC5816843 | biostudies-other
Project description:IntroductionStereotactic body (or ablative) radiotherapy (SBRT/SABR) is now a guideline-recommended treatment for medically inoperable patients with peripherally-located, stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and for medically operable patients who decline surgery. The 5-year local failure rate after SBRT is about 10% and in highly selected patients, surgery has been used as a salvage therapy. We performed a systematic review to address the feasibility, safety, and outcome of salvage surgery for locally recurrent early stage NSCLC after SBRT.MethodsA systematic literature search was performed according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched and two authors independently assessed the articles. A total of seven eligible articles were identified.ResultsAll seven articles were retrospective case series, representing a total of 47 patients. Surgery was completed in all patients. Where reported in sufficient detail, morbidity (four studies) was between 29 and 50% (series of two patients) and 90-day mortality (six studies) was between 0% (four studies) and 11% (n = 1, disease progression). Median (n = 5)/mean (n = 1) reported or calculated follow ups were 7-54.5/17.3 months. Median overall survival was reported in three studies and ranged between 13.6-82.7 months. Crude survival in three others was 2-35 months.ConclusionLimited, low-level evidence prevents firm conclusions, but based on the existing data, salvage surgery after local recurrence of NSCLC following SBRT appears technically feasible, with acceptable morbidity and mortality in appropriately selected and counselled patients who are fit enough and who accept the risks (level of evidence 4, strength of recommendation C).
| S-EPMC6047243 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC7576082 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are recommended for patients with inoperable early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with both offering promising results. However, it is largely unknown which of these two treatment modalities provides superior benefits for patients. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis compared clinical outcomes and safety between SBRT and RFA in patients with inoperable early-stage NSCLC.MethodsEligible studies published between 2001 and 2020 were obtained through a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Original English-language studies on the treatment of early-stage NSCLC with SBRT or RFA were included. Local control (LC) rates, overall survival (OS) rates, and adverse events were obtained by pooled analyses.ResultsEighty-seven SBRT studies (12,811 patients) and 18 RFA studies (1,535 patients) met the eligibility criteria. For SBRT, the LC rates (with 95% confidence intervals) at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 98% (97-98%), 95% (95-96%), 92% (91-93%), and 92% (91-93%), respectively, which were significantly higher than those for RFA [75% (69-82%), 31% (22-39%), 67% (58-76%), and 41% (30-52%), respectively] (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in short-term OS between SBRT and RFA [1-year OS rate: 87% (86-88%) versus 89% (88-91%), P=0.07; 2-year OS rate: 71% (69-72%) versus 69% (64-74%), P=0.42]. Regarding long-term OS, the 3- and 5-year OS rates for SBRT were 58% (56-59%) and 39% (37-40%), respectively, which were significantly (P<0.01) superior to those for RFA [48% (45-51%) and 21% (19-23%), respectively]. The most common complication of SBRT was radiation pneumonitis (grade ≥2), making up 9.1% of patients treated with SBRT, while pneumothorax was the most common complication of RFA, making up 27.2% of patients treated with RFA.DiscussionCompared with RFA, SBRT has superior LC and long-term OS rates but similar short-term OS rates. Prospective randomized trials with large sample sizes comparing the efficacy of SBRT and RFA are warranted.
| S-EPMC8848429 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectivesTo compare patterns of care and overall survival (OS) between stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and percutaneous local tumor ablation (LTA) for non-surgically managed early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and methodsThe National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried from 2004 to 2014 for adults with non-metastatic, node-negative invasive adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the lung with primary tumor size ≤5.0 cm who did not undergo surgery or chemotherapy and received SBRT or LTA. Patterns of care were assessed with multivariate logistic regression. After propensity-score weighting with generalized boosted regression, OS was assessed with univariate and doubly-robust multivariate Cox regression.ResultsOf 15,792 patients, 14,651 (93%) received SBRT and 1141 (7%) received LTA. Increasing age (OR 1.01, p = .035), treatment at an academic institution (OR 2.94, p < .001), increasing tumor size (OR 1.05, p < .001), and more recent year of diagnosis (OR 1.43, p < .001) were predictive of treatment with SBRT, whereas comorbidities (OR 0.74, p = .003) and treatment at a high-volume facility (OR 0.05, p < .001) were predictive for LTA. At a median follow-up of 26.2 months, SBRT was associated with improved OS relative to LTA within a propensity-score weighted doubly-robust multivariate analysis (HR 0.71, p < .001). On weighted subgroup analyses, improved OS was observed with SBRT for tumor sizes >2.0 cm (HR 0.72, p < .001) and for those treated at high-volume facilities (HR 0.71, p < .001). No OS difference was found with SBRT or LTA in tumor sizes ≤2.0 cm (HR 0.90, p = .227).ConclusionWithin the NCDB, SBRT was more commonly utilized and was associated with improved OS when compared to percutaneous LTA for patients with non-surgically managed early-stage NSCLC. Patients with small tumor volumes likely represent an appropriate population for future prospective randomized comparisons between SBRT and LTA.
| S-EPMC7082035 | biostudies-literature