Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Sequencing and curation strategies for identifying candidate glioblastoma treatments.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Prompted by the revolution in high-throughput sequencing and its potential impact for treating cancer patients, we initiated a clinical research study to compare the ability of different sequencing assays and analysis methods to analyze glioblastoma tumors and generate real-time potential treatment options for physicians.

Methods

A consortium of seven institutions in New York City enrolled 30 patients with glioblastoma and performed tumor whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq; collectively WGS/RNA-seq); 20 of these patients were also analyzed with independent targeted panel sequencing. We also compared results of expert manual annotations with those from an automated annotation system, Watson Genomic Analysis (WGA), to assess the reliability and time required to identify potentially relevant pharmacologic interventions.

Results

WGS/RNAseq identified more potentially actionable clinical results than targeted panels in 90% of cases, with an average of 16-fold more unique potentially actionable variants identified per individual; 84 clinically actionable calls were made using WGS/RNA-seq that were not identified by panels. Expert annotation and WGA had good agreement on identifying variants [mean sensitivity = 0.71, SD = 0.18 and positive predictive value (PPV) = 0.80, SD = 0.20] and drug targets when the same variants were called (mean sensitivity = 0.74, SD = 0.34 and PPV = 0.79, SD = 0.23) across patients. Clinicians used the information to modify their treatment plan 10% of the time.

Conclusion

These results present the first comprehensive comparison of technical and machine augmented analysis of targeted panel and WGS/RNA-seq to identify potential cancer treatments.

SUBMITTER: Frank MO 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6485090 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Sequencing and curation strategies for identifying candidate glioblastoma treatments.

Frank Mayu O MO   Koyama Takahiko T   Rhrissorrakrai Kahn K   Robine Nicolas N   Utro Filippo F   Emde Anne-Katrin AK   Chen Bo-Juen BJ   Arora Kanika K   Shah Minita M   Geiger Heather H   Felice Vanessa V   Dikoglu Esra E   Rahman Sadia S   Fang Alice A   Vacic Vladimir V   Bergmann Ewa A EA   Vogel Julia L Moore JLM   Reeves Catherine C   Khaira Depinder D   Calabro Anthony A   Kim Duyang D   Lamendola-Essel Michelle F MF   Esteves Cecilia C   Agius Phaedra P   Stolte Christian C   Boockvar John J   Demopoulos Alexis A   Placantonakis Dimitris G DG   Golfinos John G JG   Brennan Cameron C   Bruce Jeffrey J   Lassman Andrew B AB   Canoll Peter P   Grommes Christian C   Daras Mariza M   Diamond Eli E   Omuro Antonio A   Pentsova Elena E   Orange Dana E DE   Harvey Stephen J SJ   Posner Jerome B JB   Michelini Vanessa V VV   Jobanputra Vaidehi V   Zody Michael C MC   Kelly John J   Parida Laxmi L   Wrzeszczynski Kazimierz O KO   Royyuru Ajay K AK   Darnell Robert B RB  

BMC medical genomics 20190425 1


<h4>Background</h4>Prompted by the revolution in high-throughput sequencing and its potential impact for treating cancer patients, we initiated a clinical research study to compare the ability of different sequencing assays and analysis methods to analyze glioblastoma tumors and generate real-time potential treatment options for physicians.<h4>Methods</h4>A consortium of seven institutions in New York City enrolled 30 patients with glioblastoma and performed tumor whole genome sequencing (WGS) a  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

2009-12-10 | GSE19263 | GEO
| S-EPMC6679748 | biostudies-literature
2009-12-09 | E-GEOD-19263 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC9353163 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10365641 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9599983 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8345198 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11011069 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7017465 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7397227 | biostudies-literature