Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus metastasectomy for pulmonary metastases: guiding treatment in the oligometastatic era.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Malik NH
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6560524 | biostudies-literature | 2019 May
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy versus metastasectomy for pulmonary metastases: guiding treatment in the oligometastatic era.
Malik Nauman H NH Keilty Dana M DM Louie Alexander V AV
Journal of thoracic disease 20190501 Suppl 9
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundPulmonary metastasectomy and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) are both guideline-recommended treatments for selected patients with oligometastatic colorectal pulmonary metastases. However, there is limited evidence comparing these local treatment modalities in similar patient groups.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed records of consecutive patients treated for colorectal pulmonary metastases with surgical metastasectomy or SABR from 2012 to 2019 at two Dutch referral hospitals that had different approaches toward the local treatment of colorectal pulmonary metastases, one preferring surgery, the other preferring SABR. Two comparable patient groups were identified based on tumor and treatment characteristics.ResultsThe metastasectomy group comprised 40 patients treated for 69 metastases, and the SABR group had 60 patients who were treated for 90 metastases. Median follow-up was 38 months (IQR: 26-67) in the surgery group and 46 months (IQR: 30-79) in the SABR group. Median OS was 58 months (CI: 20-94) in the metastasectomy group and 70 months (CI: 29-111) in the SABR group (p = 0.23). Five-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 44% after metastasectomy and 30% after SABR (p = 0.16). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months (CI: 3-26) in the metastasectomy group and 10 months (CI: 6-13) in the SABR group (p = 0.049). Local recurrence rate was 12.5/7.2% of patients/metastases respectively after metastasectomy and 38.3/31.1% after SABR (p < 0.001). Lower BED Gy10 was correlated with an increased likelihood of recurrence (p = 0.025). Clavien Dindo grade III-V complication rates were 2.5% after metastasectomy and 0% after SABR (p = 0.22).ConclusionIn this retrospective cohort study, pulmonary metastasectomy and SABR had comparable overall survival, local recurrence-free survival, and complication rates, despite patients in the SABR group having a significantly lower progression-free survival and local control rate. These data would support a randomized controlled trial comparing surgery and SABR in operable patients with radically resectable colorectal pulmonary metastases.
| S-EPMC10647532 | biostudies-literature
Project description:COPPER is an international, multicenter, parallel-arm, phase III randomized controlled trial comparing two local treatment strategies (SABR or metastasectomy) for patients with an indication for local treatment for limited (max. three) colorectal pulmonary metastases
| 14547 | ecrin-mdr-crc
Project description:BackgroundWe compared the treatment outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and metastasectomy in patients with pulmonary metastases.MethodsTwenty-one patients received SBRT (total radiation doses 60 Gy in 3 fractions or 48 Gy in 4 fractions) and 30 underwent metastasectomy, most (93.3%) with wedge resection. The patients were followed for a median of 13.7 months. The tumor size in the SBRT group was larger than in the metastasectomy group (median 2.5 vs. 1.25 cm; P = 0.015). Patients with synchronous metastases were more likely to be treated with SBRT than with metastasectomy (P = 0.006).ResultsThere was no significant difference in the local control rates of the treatment groups (P = 0.163). Progression-free survival (PFS) was longer in the metastasectomy than in the SBRT group (P = 0.02), with one and two-year PFS rates of 51.1% and 46% versus 23.8% and 11.9%, respectively. The one and two-year overall survival (OS) rates were 95% and 81.8% in the metastasectomy group and 79.5% and 68.2%, in the SBRT group, respectively. In multivariate analysis, synchronous metastasis was related to poor PFS, and tumor size was the most significant factor affecting OS. There were no significant differences in PFS and OS between treatment groups after dividing patients according to the presence or absence of synchronous metastases.ConclusionsSBRT is considered a suitable local modality against pulmonary metastases; however, patients with synchronous metastases are only likely to obtain a small benefit from local treatment with either SBRT or surgery.
| S-EPMC6275814 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Liver metastasis in solid tumors, including colorectal cancer, is the most frequent and lethal complication. The development of systemic therapy has led to prolonged survival. However, in selected patients with a finite number of discrete lesions in liver, defined as oligometastatic state, additional local therapies such as surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, cryotherapy, and radiotherapy can lead to permanent local disease control and improve survival. Among these, an advance in radiation therapy made it possible to deliver high dose radiation to the tumor more accurately, without impairing the liver function. In recent years, the introduction of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) has offered even more intensive tumor dose escalation in a few fractions with reduced dose to the adjacent normal liver. Many studies have shown that SABR for oligometastases is effective and safe, with local control rates widely ranging from 50% to 100% at one or two years. And actuarial survival at one and two years has been reported ranging from 72% to 94% and from 30% to 62%, respectively, without severe toxicities. In this paper, we described the definition and technical aspects of SABR, clinical outcomes including efficacy and toxicity, and related parameters after SABR in liver oligometastases from colorectal cancer.
| S-EPMC4020541 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundStereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SBRT) is a radical option for oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients, but most data relate to visceral metastases.MethodsA prospective, multi-centre database of CRC patients treated with SBRT was interrogated. Inclusion criteria were ECOG PS 0-2, ≤3 sites of disease, a disease free interval of >6 months unless synchronous liver metastases. Primary endpoints were local control (LC), progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).Results163 patients (172 metastases) were analysed. The median FU was 16 months (IQR 12.2-22.85). The LC at 1 year was 83.8% (CI 76.4%-91.9%) with a PFS of 55% (CI 47%-64.7%) respectively. LC at 1 year was 90% (CI 83%-99%) for nodal metastases (NM), 75% (63%-90%) for visceral metastases (VM). NM had improved median PFS (9 vs 19 months) [HR 0.6, CI 0.38-0.94, p = 0.032] and median OS (32 months vs not reached) [HR 0.28, CI 0.18-0.7, p = 0.0062] than VM, regardless of whether the NM were located inside or outside the pelvis. On multivariate analysis, NM and ECOG PS 0 were significant good prognostic factors. An exploratory analysis suggests KRAS WT is also a good prognostic factor.ConclusionNodal site is an important prognostic determinant of SBRT that should incorporated into patient selection. We hypothesise this may have an immunoediting basis.
| S-EPMC7689579 | biostudies-literature
Project description:PurposeTo perform the analysis of the peripheral blood lymphocyte changes after stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with oligometastatic cancers.Materials and methodsThe dynamics of the immune status in peripheral blood was prospectively evaluated in 46 patients with lung (17 cases) or liver (29 cases) metastases treated by SABR. Flow cytometry of peripheral blood lymphocyte subpopulations was performed before SABR, 3-4 weeks and 6-8 weeks after the end of SABR: 3 fractions of 15-20 Gy or 4 fractions of 13.5 Gy. The number of treated lesions varied from 1 (32 patients) to 2-3 (14 patients).ResultsSABR induced a significant increase of T-lymphocytes (CD3+CD19-) (p = 0.001), T-helper (CD3+CD4+) (p = 0.004), activated cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CD3+CD8+HLA-DR+) (p = 0.001), activated T-helpers (CD3+CD4+HLA-DR+) (p < 0.001). A significant decrease of T-regulated immune suppressive lymphocytes (CD4+CD25brightCD127low) (p = 0.002) and NKT-cells (CD3+CD16+CD56+) (p = 0.007) was recorded after the SABR. The comparative analysis demonstrated that lower doses of SABR (EQD2Gy(α/β=10) = 93.7-105.7 Gy) induced significant increase of T-lymphocytes, activated cytotoxic T-lymphocytes, and activated CD4+CD25+ T-helpers, while SABR with higher doses (EQD2Gy(α/β=10) = 150 Gy) was not associated with these effects. A more efficient activations of T-lymphocytes (p = 0.010), activated T-helpers (p < 0.001), and cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (p = 0.003) were associated with SABR to a single lesion. A significant increase of T-lymphocytes (p = 0.002), T-helpers (p = 0.003), and activated cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (p = 0.001) was observed after SABR for hepatic metastases in contrast to SABR for lung lesions.ConclusionChanges in peripheral blood lymphocytes after SABR could be influenced by the location or the number of irradiated metastasis, and the dose of SABR.
| S-EPMC10073839 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundRecent clinical trial results reported that stereotactic radiotherapy (SABR) may improve survival for patients with oligometastatic (OM) cancer. Given that these results come from a phase II trial, there remains considerable uncertainty about this finding, and about the cost-effectiveness of SABR for patients with OM cancer. In this analysis, we estimate the cost-effectiveness of SABR for oligometastatic cancer patients.MethodsA probabilistic time-dependent Markov model was constructed to simulate treatment of oligometastatic cancer patients over five- and ten-year time horizons. The primary data source was the phase II, Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy for the Comprehensive Treatment of Oligometastases (SABR-COMET )trial and supplemented with data from the literature. We estimated the effect of SABR and the standard of care (SoC) using quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). Costs were measured from a provincial payer perspective (2018 Canadian dollars).ResultsIn the reference case analysis (five-year time horizon), SABR was associated with additional incremental costs of CAD 38,487 and an incremental QALY gain of 0.84. This resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CAD 45,726 per QALY gained. Over a ten-year time horizon, the increased uncertainty in the long-term effectiveness of SABR resulted in an ICER of CAD 291,544 per QALY gained. Estimates from the probabilistic analysis indicated that at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of CAD 50,000 and CAD 100,000 per QALY gained, there is 54% and 78% probability (respectively) that SABR would be cost-effective using the five-year time horizon.ConclusionsThe adoption of SABR therapy requires a considerable upfront capital investment. Our results suggest that the cost-effectiveness of SABR is contingent on the uncertainty in the evidence base. Further clinical trials to confirm the effectiveness of SABR and research into the real-world costs associated with this treatment could reduce the uncertainty around implementation of the technology.
| S-EPMC8161824 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and purposeThis nationwide population-based study analyzed the outcomes of local treatment (i.e. stereotactic body radiotherapy [SBRT] or metastasectomy) or systemic therapy for oligometastatic disease (OMD) in patients with esophagogastric cancer in The Netherlands.Materials and methodsBetween 2015 and 2016, all patients in The Netherlands with esophagogastric cancer and synchronous or metachronous OMD were eligible for inclusion. Patients who underwent local treatment of OMD (SBRT or metastasectomy) and/or systemic therapy were included. OMD was defined as distant metastases in 1 organ or 1 extra-regional lymph node region. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and independent prognostic factors for OS. OS was calculated from diagnosis of OMD. Prognostic factors for OS were analyzed using a multivariable Cox proportional hazard model.ResultsA total of 594 patients were included, of whom 83 underwent local treatment for OMD alone, 22 local treatment plus systemic therapy, and 489 systemic therapy alone. Median OS after local treatment for OMD alone was 16.0 months, local treatment plus systemic therapy 22.7 months, and after systemic therapy alone 8.5 months. Improved OS was independently associated with local treatment for OMD alone or combined with systemic therapy as compared with systemic therapy alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.52, 95% CI: 0.31-0.90 and HR 0.42, 95% CI: 0.22-0.82, respectively) and a controlled primary tumor(HR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.27-0.86). Worse OS was independently associated with worse performance scores (HR 1.41, 95%: 1.32-1.75), poorly or undiffertumor as compared with good or moderadifferentiated tumor (HR 1.37, 95% CI: 1.06-1.76), and peritoneal as compared with lymph mode metastases (HR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.00-1.93).ConclusionLocal treatment of OMD alone or combined with systemic therapy was independently associated with improved OS as compared with systemic therapy alone in this population-based cohort study in The Netherlands. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these results.
| S-EPMC9523096 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC9875146 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We investigated the clinical efficacy of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in patients with oligometastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The inclusion criteria were patients receiving definitive treatment for HCC with 1-5 metastatic lesions, <3 metastases in a single organ and receiving radiotherapy with fraction doses ≥6 Gy. A total of 100 patients with 121 metastatic lesions were reviewed. The most common site of metastasis was the bones (40%), followed by the lungs (38%). Systemic therapy was administered to 71% of patients. With a median follow-up of 13 months, the median overall survival (OS) was 16 months. The 2-year OS rate was 40%. The prognostic factors in univariate analysis were performance status, Child-Pugh class, primary HCC status, and time interval of metastasis. Performance status and Child-Pugh class remained in multivariate analysis. OS differed significantly depending on the number of prognostic factors: 46 months in patients with both factors (Group 1), 13 months with one factor (Group 2), and 6 months with no risk factor (Group 3) (p < 0.001). Nine patients experienced grade 1 radiation pneumonitis. Given its efficacy and safety, SABR deserves active consideration in the treatment of oligometastatic HCC.
| S-EPMC9735640 | biostudies-literature