Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Surgical resection versus ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort analysis.


ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND:The most appropriate treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study compared the association of resection versus ablation with overall survival (OS) in patients with early-stage HCC. METHODS:Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients diagnosed with stage I/II HCC between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Cox analysis was used to determine predictors of OS. RESULTS:We identified 53,161 patients, of whom 15.9% underwent ablation and 14.5% underwent resection. Patients with fewer comorbidities, larger tumors, and private insurance were more likely to undergo resection. Resection was associated with significantly improved OS compared to ablation (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.54-0.61, p?

SUBMITTER: Lee GC 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6571152 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Surgical resection versus ablation for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: A retrospective cohort analysis.

Lee Grace C GC   Ferrone Cristina R CR   Vagefi Parsia A PA   Uppot Raul N RN   Tanabe Kenneth K KK   Lillemoe Keith D KD   Blaszkowsky Lawrence S LS   Qadan Motaz M  

American journal of surgery 20190103 1


<h4>Background</h4>The most appropriate treatment for early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study compared the association of resection versus ablation with overall survival (OS) in patients with early-stage HCC.<h4>Methods</h4>Using the National Cancer Database (NCDB), patients diagnosed with stage I/II HCC between 2004 and 2014 were identified. Cox analysis was used to determine predictors of OS.<h4>Results</h4>We identified 53,161 patients, of whom 15.9% underwent a  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7550467 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8507639 | biostudies-literature