Dataset Information

Reactivation of tuberculosis in cancer patients following administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors: current evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

ABSTRACT: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs) have revolutionized cancer treatment producing remarkable and durable responses for a range of malignancies. However, the additional modulation of immune response by ICBs may rarely cause immune-related infectious complications, including re-activation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBC) with detrimental effects on those patients' outcome. Here, we present two "real-world" melanoma cases that were treated in our department with blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 and developed active Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) during immunotherapy. In view of these cases, we review the literature for ICB-associated MTB reactivation and discuss our considerations about the possible interactions of immunotherapy and the underlying co-existent mycobacterial infection. Based on the current evidence from preclinical findings prior to this experience, we raise questions regarding cancer patients who are at higher risk for developing MTB infection, whether ICB-treated patients should be considered immunocompromised, and how they should be managed for latent and/or active tuberculosis. Aside from the well-established clinical benefit of immunotherapy, the blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 axis may concurrently disrupt the immune control of specific opportunistic infections such as tuberculosis that should be carefully and expectantly managed in order to avoid compromising the outcome of cancer treatment and the affected patient's survival.

SUBMITTER: Anastasopoulou A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6727332 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Reactivation of tuberculosis in cancer patients following administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors: current evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Anastasopoulou Amalia A Ziogas Dimitrios C DC Samarkos Michael M Kirkwood John M JM Gogas Helen H

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer 20190904 1

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICBs) have revolutionized cancer treatment producing remarkable and durable responses for a range of malignancies. However, the additional modulation of immune response by ICBs may rarely cause immune-related infectious complications, including re-activation of latent tuberculosis infection (LTBC) with detrimental effects on those patients' outcome. Here, we present two "real-world" melanoma cases that were treated in our department with blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 and d ...[more]

PMID: 31484550

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAlthough several metabolic and nutritional disorders (MNDs) have been reported in the recipients of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), these events have not been fully captured and comprehensively characterized in real-world population.ObjectivesTo provide complete metabolic and nutritional toxicity profiles after ICIs (single and combined) initiation through an integrated big database.MethodsReporting odds ratios (ROR) and information component (IC) based on statistical shrinkage transformation were utilized to perform disproportionality analysis using the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Events Reporting System. Both ROR and IC were used to calculate disproportionality when compared with the whole database, but only ROR was used when comparison was made for different ICI strategies. Only when both the lower limits of 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for ROR (ROR025) and IC (IC025) exceeded specified threshold values (1 and 0, respectively) was regarded as a signal.ResultsA total of 29,294,335 records were involved and 8,662 records were for MNDs in patients exposed to ICIs. Statistically significant association was detected between ICIs use and total MNDs (IC025/ROR025 = 1.06/2.19). For monotherapy, three ICI monotherapies (anti-PD-1, anti-PDL-1, and anti-CTLA-4) were all disproportionately associated with MNDs. Statistically significant differences in reporting frequencies also emerged when comparing anti-PD-1 with anti-PD-L1/anti-CTLA-4 monotherapy, with RORs of 1.11 (95%CI 1.01-1.21), and 1.35 (95%CI 1.23-1.48), respectively. Notably, combination therapy was associated with a higher reporting frequency of theses toxicities compared to monotherapy with a ROR of 1.56 (95%CI 1.48-1.64). Additionally, disproportionality analysis at High-level Group Term level highlighted eight broad entities of MNDs. Further disproportionality analysis at Preferred Term level indicated a wide range and varied strength of signals. For ICI monotherapy, nivolumab and pembrolizumab showed the broadest spectrum of MNDs. For combination therapy, a variety of signals were detected for nivolumab + ipilimumab therapy even comparable to two PD-1 monotherapies.ConclusionMetabolic and nutritional complications could be provoked by ICI monotherapy (especially anti-PD-1) and further reinforced by combination therapy. Clinicians and patients should be informed about these potential risks that might be encountered in real-world practice. Aforehand education and regular monitoring of related biochemical parameters (calcium, sodium, potassium, protein) are recommended to ensure better cancer survivorship.

Project description:ObjectiveReports of tuberculosis (TB) during anticancer treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are increasing. However, it is not clear whether the use of ICIs is a significant risk factor for TB, including reactivation or latent TB infection (LTBI).MethodsTo determine the risk of TB reactivation in patients with lung cancer who use ICIs or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), we conducted a retrospective study using a hospital-based cancer registry. In addition, we monitored patients with cancer using ICI or TKI in a multicenter prospective study to check the incidence of LTBI.ResultsIn the retrospective study, several demographic factors were imbalanced between the ICI and TKI groups: the ICI group was younger, had more males, exhibited more squamous cell carcinoma in histology rather than adenocarcinoma, had fewer EGFR mutations, and received more chemotherapy. Propensity score matching was used to control for confounding factors, and we found that the incidence of TB was higher among patients with lung cancer who received ICIs than among those who received TKIs (2298 vs 412 per 100 000 person-years, P = .0165). Through multivariable analysis, group (ICI vs TKI) was the independent risk factor for TB development (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR): 6.29, 95% CI, 1.23-32.09, P = .0269). In the prospective cohort, which included 72 patients receiving ICIs and 50 receiving TKIs, we found that the incidence of positive seroconversion of LTBI by interferon gamma release assay (IGRA) was significantly higher in patients receiving ICIs (18% vs 0%, aHR: 9.88, P = 0.035) under multivariable Cox regression.ConclusionThe use of ICIs may be linked to a higher likelihood of TB reactivation and LTBI than individuals solely receiving TKIs as anticancer therapy. Consequently, the implementation of a screening program for TB reactivation and LTBI among patients undergoing ICI treatment could prove advantageous by enabling early detection and prompt treatment of the infection.

Dataset Information

Reactivation of tuberculosis in cancer patients following administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors: current evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Publications

Reactivation of tuberculosis in cancer patients following administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors: current evidence and clinical practice recommendations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets