Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Introduction
Study outcomes can be measured repeatedly based on the clinical trial protocol before randomization during what is known as the "run-in" period. However, it has not been established how best to incorporate run-in data into the primary analysis of the trial.Methods
We proposed two-period (run-in period and randomization period) linear mixed effects models to simultaneously model the run-in data and the postrandomization data.Results
Compared with the traditional models, the two-period linear mixed effects models can increase the power up to 15% and yield similar power for both unequal randomization and equal randomization.Discussion
Given that analysis of run-in data using the two-period linear mixed effects models allows more participants (unequal randomization) to be on the active treatment with similar power to that of the equal-randomization trials, it may reduce the dropout by assigning more participants to the active treatment and thus improve the efficiency of AD clinical trials.
SUBMITTER: Wang G
PROVIDER: S-EPMC6732759 | biostudies-literature | 2019
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Wang Guoqiao G Aschenbrenner Andrew J AJ Li Yan Y McDade Eric E Liu Lei L Benzinger Tammie L S TLS Bateman Randall J RJ Morris John C JC Hassenstab Jason J JJ Xiong Chengjie C
Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.) 20190905
<h4>Introduction</h4>Study outcomes can be measured repeatedly based on the clinical trial protocol before randomization during what is known as the "run-in" period. However, it has not been established how best to incorporate run-in data into the primary analysis of the trial.<h4>Methods</h4>We proposed two-period (run-in period and randomization period) linear mixed effects models to simultaneously model the run-in data and the postrandomization data.<h4>Results</h4>Compared with the tradition ...[more]