Dataset Information

Comparison of outcomes between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic incident hemodialysis patients with functioning arteriovenous fistulas.

ABSTRACT: This study compared clinical outcomes of patient survival and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) patency between incident hemodialysis patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Between January 2011 and December 2013, 384 consecutive incident hemodialysis patients with confirmed first upper-extremity AVF placement were divided into a T2DM group (n = 180, 46.9%) and a non-DM group (n = 204, 53.1%) and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcome was AVF patency.Patients in the T2DM group had a higher prevalence of hypertension (P = .02), smoking (P < .01), cardiovascular disease (P < .01), history of cerebrovascular accident (CVA) (P < .01), and peripheral arterial occlusive disease (P < .01) than those in the non-DM group. On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the overall survival and AVF patency rates were significantly higher in the non-DM group relative to the T2DM group (both P < .01). In the adjusted model, older age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.06; P < .01), T2DM (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.12-2.77; P = .014), and history of CVA (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.04-2.98; P = .04) were significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality. Older age and T2DM were independently associated with decreased primary (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.04; P < .01, HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.22-2.33; P < .01, respectively) and secondary (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04; P < .01, HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.42-3.00; P < .01, respectively) AVF patency during follow-up.Compared with patients in the non-DM group, patients in the T2DM group had a higher mortality rate and worse AVF patency rates.

SUBMITTER: Jeong S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC6890339 | biostudies-literature | 2019 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of outcomes between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic incident hemodialysis patients with functioning arteriovenous fistulas.

Jeong Seonjeong S Kwon Hyunwook H Chang Jai Won JW Kim Min-Ju MJ Ganbold Khaliun K Han Youngjin Y Kwon Tae-Won TW Cho Yong-Pil YP

Medicine 20191101 48

This study compared clinical outcomes of patient survival and arteriovenous fistula (AVF) patency between incident hemodialysis patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Between January 2011 and December 2013, 384 consecutive incident hemodialysis patients with confirmed first upper-extremity AVF placement were divided into a T2DM group (n = 180, 46.9%) and a non-DM group (n = 204, 53.1%) and analyzed retrospectively. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary out ...[more]

PMID: 31770282

Similar Datasets

Project description:In an incident hemodialysis (HD) population, we aimed to investigate whether arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation before HD initiation was associated with improved AVF patency compared with AVF creation from a central venous catheter (CVC), and also to compare patient survival between these patients. Between January 2011 and December 2013, 524 incident HD patients with identified first predialysis vascular access with an AVF (pre-HD group, n = 191) or an AVF from a CVC (on-HD group, n = 333) were included and analyzed retrospectively. The study outcome was defined as AVF patency and all-cause mortality (time to death). On Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, primary and secondary AVF patency rates did not differ significantly between the two groups (P = 0.812 and P = 0.586, respectively), although the overall survival rate was significantly higher in the pre-HD group compared with the on-HD group (P = 0.013). On multivariate analysis, well-known patient factors were associated with decreased primary (older age and diabetes mellitus [DM]) and secondary (DM and peripheral arterial occlusive disease) AVF patency, whereas use of a CVC as the initial predialysis access (hazard ratios, 1.84; 95% confidence intervals, 1.20-2.75; P = 0.005) was significantly associated with worse survival in addition to well-known patient factors (older age, diabetes mellitus, and peripheral arterial occlusive disease). Worse survival in the on-HD group was likely confounded by selection bias because of the retrospective nature of our study. Therefore, the observed lower mortality associated with AVF creation before HD initiation is not fully attributable to CVC use, but rather, affected by other patient-level prognostic factors. There were no CVC-related complications in the pre-HD group, whereas 10.2% of CVC-related complications were noted in the on-HD group. In conclusion, among incident HD patients, compared with patients who underwent creation of an AVF from a CVC, initial AVF creation showed similar primary and secondary AVF patency rates, but lower mortality risk. We also observed that an initial CVC use was an independent risk factor associated with worse survival. A fistula-first strategy might be the best option for incident HD patients who are good candidates for AVF creation.

Project description:Background and purposeA minority of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas progress with time. We sought to determine features that predict progression and define outcomes of patients with progressive dural arteriovenous fistulas.Materials and methodsWe performed a retrospective imaging and clinical record review of patients with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula evaluated at our hospital.ResultsOf 579 patients with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas, 545 had 1 fistula (mean age, 45 ± 23 years) and 34 (5.9%) had enlarging, de novo, multiple, or recurrent fistulas (mean age, 53 ± 20 years; P = .11). Among these 34 patients, 19 had progressive dural arteriovenous fistulas with de novo fistulas or fistula enlargement with time (mean age, 36 ± 25 years; progressive group) and 15 had multiple or recurrent but nonprogressive fistulas (mean age, 57 ± 13 years; P = .0059, nonprogressive group). Whereas all 6 children had fistula progression, only 13/28 adults (P = .020) progressed. Angioarchitectural correlates to chronically elevated intracranial venous pressures, including venous sinus dilation (41% versus 7%, P = .045) and pseudophlebitic cortical venous pattern (P = .048), were more common in patients with progressive disease than in those without progression. Patients with progressive disease received more treatments than those without progression (median, 5 versus 3; P = .0068), but as a group, they did not demonstrate worse clinical outcomes (median mRS, 1 and 1; P = .39). However, 3 young patients died from intracranial venous hypertension and intracranial hemorrhage related to progression of their fistulas despite extensive endovascular, surgical, and radiosurgical treatments.ConclusionsFew patients with dural arteriovenous fistulas follow an aggressive, progressive clinical course despite treatment. Younger age at initial presentation and angioarchitectural correlates to venous hypertension may help identify these patients prospectively.

Project description:ContextThe arteriovenous fistula is the preferred type of vascular access for hemodialysis because of lower thrombosis and infection rates and lower health care expenditures compared with synthetic grafts or central venous catheters. Early failure of fistulas due to thrombosis or inadequate maturation is a barrier to increasing the prevalence of fistulas among patients treated with hemodialysis. Small, inconclusive trials have suggested that antiplatelet agents may reduce thrombosis of new fistulas.ObjectiveTo determine whether clopidogrel reduces early failure of hemodialysis fistulas.Design, setting, and participantsRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted at 9 US centers composed of academic and community nephrology practices in 2003-2007. Eight hundred seventy-seven participants with end-stage renal disease or advanced chronic kidney disease were followed up until 150 to 180 days after fistula creation or 30 days after initiation of dialysis, whichever occurred later.InterventionParticipants were randomly assigned to receive clopidogrel (300-mg loading dose followed by daily dose of 75 mg; n = 441) or placebo (n = 436) for 6 weeks starting within 1 day after fistula creation.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcome was fistula thrombosis, determined by physical examination at 6 weeks. The secondary outcome was failure of the fistula to become suitable for dialysis. Suitability was defined as use of the fistula at a dialysis machine blood pump rate of 300 mL/min or more during 8 of 12 dialysis sessions.ResultsEnrollment was stopped after 877 participants were randomized based on a stopping rule for intervention efficacy. Fistula thrombosis occurred in 53 (12.2%) participants assigned to clopidogrel compared with 84 (19.5%) participants assigned to placebo (relative risk, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.46-0.97; P = .018). Failure to attain suitability for dialysis did not differ between the clopidogrel and placebo groups (61.8% vs 59.5%, respectively; relative risk, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 0.94-1.17; P = .40).ConclusionClopidogrel reduces the frequency of early thrombosis of new arteriovenous fistulas but does not increase the proportion of fistulas that become suitable for dialysis. Trial Registration clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00067119.

Dataset Information

Comparison of outcomes between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic incident hemodialysis patients with functioning arteriovenous fistulas.

Publications

Comparison of outcomes between type 2 diabetic and non-diabetic incident hemodialysis patients with functioning arteriovenous fistulas.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets