Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Validating the validation: reanalyzing a large-scale comparison of deep learning and machine learning models for bioactivity prediction.


ABSTRACT: Machine learning methods may have the potential to significantly accelerate drug discovery. However, the increasing rate of new methodological approaches being published in the literature raises the fundamental question of how models should be benchmarked and validated. We reanalyze the data generated by a recently published large-scale comparison of machine learning models for bioactivity prediction and arrive at a somewhat different conclusion. We show that the performance of support vector machines is competitive with that of deep learning methods. Additionally, using a series of numerical experiments, we question the relevance of area under the receiver operating characteristic curve as a metric in virtual screening. We further suggest that area under the precision-recall curve should be used in conjunction with the receiver operating characteristic curve. Our numerical experiments also highlight challenges in estimating the uncertainty in model performance via scaffold-split nested cross validation.

SUBMITTER: Robinson MC 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7292817 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Validating the validation: reanalyzing a large-scale comparison of deep learning and machine learning models for bioactivity prediction.

Robinson Matthew C MC   Glen Robert C RC   Lee Alpha A AA  

Journal of computer-aided molecular design 20200120 7


Machine learning methods may have the potential to significantly accelerate drug discovery. However, the increasing rate of new methodological approaches being published in the literature raises the fundamental question of how models should be benchmarked and validated. We reanalyze the data generated by a recently published large-scale comparison of machine learning models for bioactivity prediction and arrive at a somewhat different conclusion. We show that the performance of support vector ma  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8194504 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8487527 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2409338 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4363621 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8056638 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6011237 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7726032 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6167198 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7099065 | biostudies-literature