Skin sensitization in silico protocol.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Johnson C
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7518315 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Skin sensitization in silico protocol.
Johnson Candice C Ahlberg Ernst E Anger Lennart T LT Beilke Lisa L Benigni Romualdo R Bercu Joel J Bobst Sol S Bower David D Brigo Alessandro A Campbell Sarah S Cronin Mark T D MTD Crooks Ian I Cross Kevin P KP Doktorova Tatyana T Exner Thomas T Faulkner David D Fearon Ian M IM Fehr Markus M Gad Shayne C SC Gervais Véronique V Giddings Amanda A Glowienke Susanne S Hardy Barry B Hasselgren Catrin C Hillegass Jedd J Jolly Robert R Krupp Eckart E Lomnitski Liat L Magby Jason J Mestres Jordi J Milchak Lawrence L Miller Scott S Muster Wolfgang W Neilson Louise L Parakhia Rahul R Parenty Alexis A Parris Patricia P Paulino Alexandre A Paulino Ana Theresa AT Roberts David W DW Schlecker Harald H Stidl Reinhard R Suarez-Rodrigez Diana D Szabo David T DT Tice Raymond R RR Urbisch Daniel D Vuorinen Anna A Wall Brian B Weiler Thibaud T White Angela T AT Whritenour Jessica J Wichard Joerg J Woolley David D Zwickl Craig C Myatt Glenn J GJ
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP 20200701
The assessment of skin sensitization has evolved over the past few years to include in vitro assessments of key events along the adverse outcome pathway and opportunistically capitalize on the strengths of in silico methods to support a weight of evidence assessment without conducting a test in animals. While in silico methods vary greatly in their purpose and format; there is a need to standardize the underlying principles on which such models are developed and to make transparent the implicati ...[more]
Similar Datasets
Project description:Skin sensitization is an important regulatory endpoint associated with allergic contact dermatitis. Recently, several adverse outcome pathway (AOP)-based alternative methods were developed to replace animal testing for evaluating skin sensitizers. The AOP-based assays were further integrated as a two-out-of-three method with good predictivity. However, the acquisition of experimental data is resource-intensive. In contrast, an integrated testing strategy (ITS) capable of maximizing the usage of laboratory data from AOP-based and in silico methods was developed as defined approaches (DAs) to both hazard and potency assessment. There are currently two in silico models, namely Derek Nexus and OECD QSAR Toolbox, evaluated in the OECD Testing Guideline No. 497. Since more advanced machine learning algorithms have been proposed for skin sensitization prediction, it is therefore desirable to evaluate their performance under the ITS framework. This study evaluated the performance of a new ITS DA (ITS-SkinSensPred) adopting a transfer learning-based SkinSensPred model. Results showed that the ITS-SkinSensPred has similar or slightly better performance compared to the other ITS models. SkinSensPred-based ITS is expected to be a promising method for assessing skin sensitization.
| S-EPMC9566590 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Allergic contact dermatitis, or the clinical manifestation of skin sensitization, is a leading occupational hazard. Several testing approaches exist to assess skin sensitization, but in silico models are perhaps the most advantageous due to their high speed and low-cost results. Many in silico skin sensitization models exist, though many have only been tested against results from animal studies (e.g., LLNA); this creates uncertainty in human skin sensitization assessments in both a screening and regulatory context. This project’s aim was to evaluate the accuracy of eight in silico skin sensitization models against two human data sets: one highly curated (Basketter et al., 2014) and one screening level (HSDB). The binary skin sensitization status of each chemical in each of the two data sets was compared to the prediction from eight in silico skin sensitization tools (Toxtree, PredSkin, OECD’s QSAR Toolbox, UL’s REACHAcross™, Danish QSAR Database, TIMES-SS, and Lhasa Limited’s Derek Nexus). Models were assessed for coverage, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, as well as optimization features (e.g., probability of accuracy, applicability domain, etc.), if available. While there was a wide range of sensitivity and specificity, the models generally performed comparably to the LLNA in predicting human skin sensitization status (i.e., approximately 70-80% accuracy). Additionally, the models did not mispredict the same compounds, suggesting there might be an advantage in combining models. In silico skin sensitization models offer accurate and useful insights in a screening context; however, further improvements are necessary so these models may be considered fully reliable for regulatory applications.
| S-EPMC11316520 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Skin sensitization test data are required or considered by chemical regulation authorities around the world. These data are used to develop product hazard labeling for the protection of consumers or workers and to assess risks from exposure to skin-sensitizing chemicals. To identify opportunities for regulatory uses of non-animal replacements for skin sensitization tests, the needs and uses for skin sensitization test data must first be clarified. Thus, we reviewed skin sensitization testing requirements for seven countries or regions that are represented in the International Cooperation on Alternative Test Methods (ICATM). We noted the type of skin sensitization data required for each chemical sector and whether these data were used in a hazard classification, potency classification, or risk assessment context; the preferred tests; and whether alternative non-animal tests were acceptable. An understanding of national and regional regulatory requirements for skin sensitization testing will inform the development of ICATM's international strategy for the acceptance and implementation of non-animal alternatives to assess the health hazards and risks associated with potential skin sensitizers.
| S-EPMC5935556 | biostudies-literature
Project description:One of the top priorities of the Interagency Coordinating Committee for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM) is the identification and evaluation of non-animal alternatives for skin sensitization testing. Although skin sensitization is a complex process, the key biological events of the process have been well characterized in an adverse outcome pathway (AOP) proposed by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). Accordingly, ICCVAM is working to develop integrated decision strategies based on the AOP using in vitro, in chemico and in silico information. Data were compiled for 120 substances tested in the murine local lymph node assay (LLNA), direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), human cell line activation test (h-CLAT) and KeratinoSens assay. Data for six physicochemical properties, which may affect skin penetration, were also collected, and skin sensitization read-across predictions were performed using OECD QSAR Toolbox. All data were combined into a variety of potential integrated decision strategies to predict LLNA outcomes using a training set of 94 substances and an external test set of 26 substances. Fifty-four models were built using multiple combinations of machine learning approaches and predictor variables. The seven models with the highest accuracy (89-96% for the test set and 96-99% for the training set) for predicting LLNA outcomes used a support vector machine (SVM) approach with different combinations of predictor variables. The performance statistics of the SVM models were higher than any of the non-animal tests alone and higher than simple test battery approaches using these methods. These data suggest that computational approaches are promising tools to effectively integrate data sources to identify potential skin sensitizers without animal testing. Published 2016. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
| S-EPMC4945438 | biostudies-literature
Project description:It has long been recognized that skin sensitizers either are electrophilic or can be activated to electrophilic species. Several nonanimal assays for skin sensitization are based on this premise. In the course of a project to update dermal sensitization thresholds (DST), we found a substantial number of sensitizers, with no electrophilic or pro-electrophilic alerts, that could be simply explained in terms of the sensitizer acting as a nucleophile. In some cases, the nucleophilic center is a sulfur or phosphorus atom, while in others, it is an aromatic carbon atom. For carbon-centered nucleophiles, a quantitative mechanistic model based on a combination of Hammett σ+ and logP values has been derived. This has been applied to rationalize several groups of known sensitizers with no electrophilic or pro-electrophilic alerts, including anacardic acids and cardols, which are known human sensitizers associated with, inter alia, cashew nut oil, mango, and Ginkgo biloba. The possibility of nucleophilic sensitization needs to be considered when evaluating new chemicals for skin sensitization potential and potency by nonanimal assays, particularly those based on the premise that skin sensitization is dependent upon reactions of electrophiles with skin protein-based nucleophiles.
| S-EPMC11577424 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIn addition to its involvement in both the innate and adaptive immune systems, vitamin D has been found to affect keratinocyte function and proliferation, suggesting a possible role for vitamin D in cutaneous allergic sensitization.ObjectiveTo explore the role of circulating vitamin D levels in allergic sensitization.MethodsSerum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) levels were measured in a subset of children (N = 323) enrolled in the Mechanisms of Progression of Atopic Dermatitis to Asthma in Children cohort, a prospective early life cohort of children with atopic dermatitis. Allergic sensitization was determined using skin prick testing, and FLG expression in the keratinocytes was measured by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Multiple Poisson regression was used to evaluate interaction effects between serum 25(OH)D levels and FLG expression with sensitization load as the outcome.ResultsBlack participants had significantly lower mean levels of serum 25(OH)D compared with non-Black participants (29.3 vs 32.9 ng/mL; P < .001). FLG expression and sensitization load were negatively correlated in non-Black participants with 25(OH)D levels less than 27.2 ng/mL (Rho = -0.45; P = .02). No association between FLG expression and sensitization load was found in Black participants or participants with 25(OH)D levels greater than or equal to 27.2 ng/mL. Multiple Poisson regression models confirmed that 25(OH)D levels interact with FLG expression to affect sensitization load in non-Black participants.ConclusionDespite lower vitamin D levels in Black participants, sensitization load was associated with nonlesional skin FLG expression in non-Black, but not Black, children with low vitamin D levels. Thus, a complex interplay of factors determines the impact of vitamin D on allergic sensitization.
| S-EPMC9109635 | biostudies-literature
Project description:For at least half a century, noninvasive techniques have been available to quantify skin barrier function, and these have shown that a number of human skin conditions and disorders are associated with defects in skin permeability. In the past decade, several genes responsible for skin barrier defects observed in both monogenetic and complex polygenic disorders have been elucidated and functionally characterized. This has led to an explosion of work in the past 6 years that has identified pathways connecting epidermal barrier disruption and antigen uptake, as well as the quality and/or magnitude of the antigen-specific adaptive immune response. This review will introduce the notion that diseases arise from the dynamic crosstalk that occurs between skin barrier and the immune system using atopic dermatitis or eczema as the disease prototype. Nevertheless, the concepts put forth are highly relevant to a number of antigen-driven disorders for which skin barrier is at least transiently compromised, such as psoriasis, allergic contact dermatitis, and blistering disorders.
| S-EPMC3279586 | biostudies-literature
Project description:One of the Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Method's (ICCVAM) top priorities is the development and evaluation of non-animal approaches to identify potential skin sensitizers. The complexity of biological events necessary to produce skin sensitization suggests that no single alternative method will replace the currently accepted animal tests. ICCVAM is evaluating an integrated approach to testing and assessment based on the adverse outcome pathway for skin sensitization that uses machine learning approaches to predict human skin sensitization hazard. We combined data from three in chemico or in vitro assays - the direct peptide reactivity assay (DPRA), human cell line activation test (h-CLAT) and KeratinoSens™ assay - six physicochemical properties and an in silico read-across prediction of skin sensitization hazard into 12 variable groups. The variable groups were evaluated using two machine learning approaches, logistic regression and support vector machine, to predict human skin sensitization hazard. Models were trained on 72 substances and tested on an external set of 24 substances. The six models (three logistic regression and three support vector machine) with the highest accuracy (92%) used: (1) DPRA, h-CLAT and read-across; (2) DPRA, h-CLAT, read-across and KeratinoSens; or (3) DPRA, h-CLAT, read-across, KeratinoSens and log P. The models performed better at predicting human skin sensitization hazard than the murine local lymph node assay (accuracy 88%), any of the alternative methods alone (accuracy 63-79%) or test batteries combining data from the individual methods (accuracy 75%). These results suggest that computational methods are promising tools to identify effectively the potential human skin sensitizers without animal testing. Published 2016. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.
| S-EPMC5243794 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The replacement of animal use in testing for regulatory classification of skin sensitizers is a priority for US federal agencies that use data from such testing. Machine learning models that classify substances as sensitizers or non-sensitizers without using animal data have been developed and evaluated. Because some regulatory agencies require that sensitizers be further classified into potency categories, we developed statistical models to predict skin sensitization potency for murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) and human outcomes. Input variables for our models included six physicochemical properties and data from three non-animal test methods: direct peptide reactivity assay; human cell line activation test; and KeratinoSens™ assay. Models were built to predict three potency categories using four machine learning approaches and were validated using external test sets and leave-one-out cross-validation. A one-tiered strategy modeled all three categories of response together while a two-tiered strategy modeled sensitizer/non-sensitizer responses and then classified the sensitizers as strong or weak sensitizers. The two-tiered model using the support vector machine with all assay and physicochemical data inputs provided the best performance, yielding accuracy of 88% for prediction of LLNA outcomes (120 substances) and 81% for prediction of human test outcomes (87 substances). The best one-tiered model predicted LLNA outcomes with 78% accuracy and human outcomes with 75% accuracy. By comparison, the LLNA predicts human potency categories with 69% accuracy (60 of 87 substances correctly categorized). These results suggest that computational models using non-animal methods may provide valuable information for assessing skin sensitization potency. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| S-EPMC5435511 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Skin sensitization potential or potency is an important end point in the safety assessment of new chemicals and new chemical mixtures. Formerly, animal experiments such as the local lymph node assay (LLNA) were the main form of assessment. Today, however, the focus lies on the development of nonanimal testing approaches (i.e., in vitro and in chemico assays) and computational models. In this work, we investigate, based on publicly available LLNA data, the ability of aggregated, Mondrian conformal prediction classifiers to differentiate between non- sensitizing and sensitizing compounds as well as between two levels of skin sensitization potential (weak to moderate sensitizers, and strong to extreme sensitizers). The advantage of the conformal prediction framework over other modeling approaches is that it assigns compounds to activity classes only if a defined minimum level of confidence is reached for the individual predictions. This eliminates the need for applicability domain criteria that often are arbitrary in their nature and less flexible. Our new binary classifier, named Skin Doctor CP, differentiates nonsensitizers from sensitizers with a higher reliability-to-efficiency ratio than the corresponding nonconformal prediction workflow that we presented earlier. When tested on a set of 257 compounds at the significance levels of 0.10 and 0.30, the model reached an efficiency of 0.49 and 0.92, and an accuracy of 0.83 and 0.75, respectively. In addition, we developed a ternary classification workflow to differentiate nonsensitizers, weak to moderate sensitizers, and strong to extreme sensitizers. Although this model achieved satisfactory overall performance (accuracies of 0.90 and 0.73, and efficiencies of 0.42 and 0.90, at significance levels 0.10 and 0.30, respectively), it did not obtain satisfying class-wise results (at a significance level of 0.30, the validities obtained for nonsensitizers, weak to moderate sensitizers, and strong to extreme sensitizers were 0.70, 0.58, and 0.63, respectively). We argue that the model is, in consequence, unable to reliably identify strong to extreme sensitizers and suggest that other ternary models derived from the currently accessible LLNA data might suffer from the same problem. Skin Doctor CP is available via a public web service at https://nerdd.zbh.uni-hamburg.de/skinDoctorII/.
| S-EPMC7887802 | biostudies-literature