Dataset Information

Evaluation of Risk-Adjusted Home Time After Hospitalization for Heart Failure as a Potential Hospital Performance Metric.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Thirty-day home time, defined as time spent alive and out of a hospital or facility, is a novel, patient-centered performance metric that incorporates readmission and mortality.

Objectives

To characterize risk-adjusted 30-day home time in patients discharged with heart failure (HF) as a hospital-level quality metric and evaluate its association with the 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate (RSRR), 30-day risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR), and 1-year RSMR.

Design, setting, and participants

This hospital-level cohort study retrospectively analyzed 100% of Medicare claims data from 2 968 341 patients from 3134 facilities from January 1, 2012, to November 30, 2017.

Exposures

Home time, defined as time spent alive and out of a short-term hospital, skilled nursing facility, or intermediate/long-term facility 30 days after discharge.

Main outcomes and measures

For each hospital, a risk-adjusted 30-day home time for HF was calculated similar to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services risk-adjustment models for 30-day RSRR and RSMR. Hospitals were categorized into quartiles (lowest to highest risk-adjusted home time). The correlations between hospital rates of risk-adjusted 30-day home time and 30-day RSRR, 30-day RSMR, and 1-year RSMR were estimated using the Pearson correlation coefficient. Distribution of days lost from a perfect 30-day home time were calculated. Reclassification of hospital performance using 30-day home time vs 30-day RSRR was also evaluated.

Results

Overall, 2 968 341 patients (mean [SD] age, 81.0 [8.3] years; 53.6% female) from 3134 hospitals were included in this study. The median hospital risk-adjusted 30-day home time for patients with HF was 21.77 days (range, 8.22-28.41 days). Hospitals in the highest quartile of risk-adjusted 30-day home time (best-performing hospitals) were larger (mean [SD] number of beds, 285 [275]), with a higher volume of patients with HF (median, 797 patients; interquartile range, 395-1484) and were more likely academic hospitals (59.9%) with availability of cardiac surgery (51.1%) and cardiac rehabilitation (68.8%). A total of 72% of home time lost was attributable to stays in an intermediate- or long-term care facility (mean [SD], 2.65 [6.44] days) or skilled nursing facility (mean [SD], 3.96 [9.04] days), 13% was attributable to short-term readmissions (mean [SD], 1.25 [3.25] days), and 15% was attributable to death (mean [SD], 1.37 [6.04] days). Among 30-day outcomes, the 30-day RSRR and 30-day RSMR decreased in a graded fashion across increasing 30-day home time categories (correlation coefficients: 30-day RSRR and 30-day home time, -0.23, P < .001; 30-day RSMR and 30-day home time, -0.31, P < .001). Similar patterns of association were also noted for 1-year RSMR and 30-day home time (correlation coefficient, -0.35, P < .001). Thirty-day home time meaningfully reclassified hospital performance in 30% of the hospitals compared with 30-day RSRR and in 25% of hospitals compared with 30-day RSMR.

Conclusions and relevance

In this study, 30-day home time among patients discharged after a hospitalization for HF was objectively assessed as a hospital-level quality metric using Medicare claims data and was associated with readmission and mortality outcomes and with reclassification of hospital performance compared with 30-day RSRR and 30-day RSMR.

SUBMITTER: Pandey A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7593877 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Feb

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of Risk-Adjusted Home Time After Hospitalization for Heart Failure as a Potential Hospital Performance Metric.

Pandey Ambarish A Keshvani Neil N Vaughan-Sarrazin Mary S MS Gao Yubo Y Fonarow Gregg C GC Yancy Clyde C Girotra Saket S

JAMA cardiology 20210201 2

<h4>Importance</h4>Thirty-day home time, defined as time spent alive and out of a hospital or facility, is a novel, patient-centered performance metric that incorporates readmission and mortality.<h4>Objectives</h4>To characterize risk-adjusted 30-day home time in patients discharged with heart failure (HF) as a hospital-level quality metric and evaluate its association with the 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate (RSRR), 30-day risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR), and 1-year RSMR.<h4> ...[more]

PMID: 33112393

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe utility of 30-day risk-standardized readmission rate (RSRR) as a hospital performance metric has been a matter of debate. Home time is a patient-centered outcome measure that accounts for rehospitalization, mortality, and postdischarge care. We aim to characterize risk-adjusted 30-day home time in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) as a hospital-level performance metric and to evaluate associations with 30-day RSRR, 30-day risk-standardized mortality rate (RSMR), and 1-year RSMR.MethodsThe study included 984 612 patients with AMI hospitalization across 2379 hospitals between 2009 and 2015 derived from 100% Medicare claims data. Home time was defined as the number of days alive and spent outside of a hospital, skilled nursing facility, or intermediate-/long-term acute care facility 30 days after discharge. Correlations between hospital-level risk-adjusted 30-day home time and 30-day RSRR, 30-day RSMR, and 1-year RSMR were estimated with the Pearson correlation. Reclassification in hospital performance using 30-day home time versus 30-day RSRR and 30-day RSMR was also evaluated.ResultsMedian hospital-level risk-adjusted 30-day home time was 24.0 days (range, 15.3-29.0 days). Hospitals with higher home time were more commonly academic centers, had available cardiac surgery and rehabilitation services, and had higher AMI volume and percutaneous coronary intervention use during the AMI hospitalization. Of the mean 30-day home time days lost, 58% were to intermediate-/long-term care or skilled nursing facility stays (4.7 days), 30% to death (2.5 days), and 12% to readmission (1.0 days). Hospital-level risk-adjusted 30-day home time was inversely correlated with 30-day RSMR (r=-0.22, P<0.0001) and 30-day RSRR (r=-0.25, P<0.0001). Patients admitted to hospitals with higher risk-adjusted 30-day home time had lower 30-day readmission (quartile 1 versus 4, 21% versus 17%), 30-day mortality rate (5% versus 3%), and 1-year mortality rate (18% versus 12%). Furthermore, 30-day home time reclassified hospital performance status in ≈30% of hospitals versus 30-day RSRR and 30-day RSMR.ConclusionsThirty-day home time for patients with AMI can be assessed as a hospital-level performance metric with the use of Medicare claims data. It varies across hospitals, is associated with postdischarge readmission and mortality outcomes, and meaningfully reclassifies hospital performance compared with the 30-day RSRR and 30-day RSMR metrics.

Project description:BackgroundThe Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) use hospital readmissions as a performance metric to incentivize hospital care for acute conditions including pneumonia. However, there are limitations to using readmission alone as a hospital performance metric.ObjectiveTo characterize 30-day risk-standardized home time (RSHT), a novel patient-centered post-discharge performance metric for acute pneumonia hospitalizations in Medicare patients, and compare hospital rankings based on this metric with mortality and readmissions.Study designRetrospective, cohort study.ParticipantsA cohort of Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries admitted between January 01, 2015 and November 30, 2017.InterventionsNone.Main measuresRisk-standardized hospital-level home time within 30 days of discharge was evaluated as a novel performance metric. Multilevel regression models were used to calculate hospital-level estimates and rank hospitals based on RSHT, readmission rate (RSRR), and mortality rate (RSMR).Key resultsA total of 1.7 million pneumonia admissions admitted to one of the 3116 hospitals were eligible for inclusion. The median 30-day RSHT was 20.5 days (interquartile range: 18.9-21.9 days; range: 5-29 days). Hospital-level characteristics such as case volume, bed size, for-profit ownership, rural location of the hospital, teaching status, and participation in the bundled payment program were significantly associated with home time. We found a modest, inverse correlation of RSHT with RSRR (rho: -0.233, p< 0.0001) and RSMR (rho: -0.223, p< 0.0001) for pneumonia. About 1/3rd of hospitals were reclassified as high performers based on their RSHT metric compared with the rank on their RSRR and RSMR metrics.ConclusionHome time is a novel, patient-centered, hospital-level metric that can be easily calculated using claims data and accounts for mortality, readmission to an acute care facility, and admission to a skilled nursing facility or long-term care facility after discharge. Utilization of this patient-centered metric could have policy implications in assessing hospital performance on delivery of healthcare to pneumonia patients.

Project description:Background In patients with heart failure (HF), malnutrition and dietary sodium excess are common and may worsen outcomes. No prior studies have provided low-sodium, nutritionally complete meals following HF hospitalization. Methods and Results The GOURMET-HF study (Geriatric Out-of-Hospital Randomized Meal Trial in Heart Failure) randomized patients discharged from HF hospitalization to 4 weeks of home-delivered sodium-restricted Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension meals (DASH/SRD; 1500 mg sodium/d) versus usual care. The primary outcome was the between-group change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire summary score from discharge to 4 weeks postdischarge. Additional outcomes included changes in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score and cardiac biomarkers. All patients were followed 12 weeks for death/all-cause readmission and potential diet-related adverse events (symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalemia, acute kidney injury). Sixty-six patients were randomized 1:1 at discharge to DASH/SRD versus usual care (age, 71±8 years; 30% female; ejection fraction, 39±18%). The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire summary score increased similarly between groups (DASH/SRD 46±23-59±20 versus usual care 43±19-53±24; P=0.38), but the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score increase tended to be greater in DASH/SRD participants (47±22-65±19 versus 45±20-55±26; P=0.053). Potentially diet-related adverse events were uncommon; 30-day HF readmissions (11% versus 27%; P=0.06) and days rehospitalized within that timeframe (17 versus 55; P=0.055) trended lower in DASH/SRD participants. Conclusions Home-delivered DASH/SRD after HF hospitalization appeared safe in selected patients and had directionally favorable effects on HF clinical status and 30-day readmissions. Larger studies are warranted to clarify the effects of postdischarge nutritional support in patients with HF. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02148679.

Project description:BackgroundSurveys of patients with cardiovascular disease have suggested that "home-time"-being alive and out of any health care institution-is a prioritized outcome. This novel measure has not been studied among patients with heart failure (HF).ObjectivesThis study sought to characterize home-time following hospitalization for HF and assess its relationship with patient characteristics and traditionally reported clinical outcomes.MethodsUsing GWTG-HF (Get With The Guidelines-Heart Failure) registry data, patients discharged alive from an HF hospitalization between 2011 and 2014 and ≥65 years of age were identified. Using Medicare claims, post-discharge home-time over 30-day and 1-year follow-up was calculated for each patient as the number of days alive and spent outside of a hospital, skilled nursing facility (SNF), or rehabilitation facility.ResultsAmong 59,736 patients, 57,992 (97.1%) and 42,153 (70.6%) had complete follow-up for home-time calculation through 30 days and 1 year, respectively. The mean home-time was 21.6 ± 11.7 days at 30 days and 243.9 ± 137.6 days at 1 year. Contributions to reduced home-time varied by follow-up period, with days spent in SNF being the largest contributor though 30 days and death being the largest contributor through 1 year. Over 1 year, 2,044 (4.8%) patients had no home-time following index hospitalization discharge, whereas 8,194 (19.4%) had 365 days of home-time. In regression models, several conditions were associated with substantially reduced home-time, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, renal insufficiency, and dementia. Through 1 year, home-time was highly correlated with time-to-event endpoints of death (tau = 0.72) and the composite of death or HF readmission (tau = 0.59).ConclusionsHome-time, which can be readily calculated from administrative claims data, is substantially reduced for many patients following hospitalization for HF and is highly correlated with traditional time-to-event mortality and hospitalization outcomes. Home-time represents a novel, easily measured, patient-centered endpoint that may reflect effectiveness of interventions in future HF studies.

Project description:AimsIn patients with palliative end-stage heart failure, interventions that could provide symptomatic relief and prevent hospital admissions are important. Ambulatory continuous intravenous inotropes have been advocated by guidelines for such a purpose. We sought to determine the effect of intravenous dobutamine on symptomatic status, hospital stay, mortality, and cost expenditure.Methods and resultsAll consecutive end-stage heart failure patients not amenable for advanced therapies and discharged with continuous intravenous home dobutamine from a single tertiary centre between April 2011 and January 2017 were retrospectively analysed. Dobutamine (fixed dose) was infused through a single-lumen central venous catheter with a small pump that was refilled by a nurse on a daily basis. Symptomatic status was longitudinally assessed as the change in New York Heart Association class and patient global assessment scale. Antecedent and incident heart failure hospitalizations were determined in a paired fashion, and cost impact was assessed. A total of 21 patients (age 77 ± 9 years) were followed up for 869 ± 647 days. At first follow-up (6 ± 1 weeks) after the initiation of dobutamine, patients had a significant improvement in New York Heart Association class (-1.29 ± 0.64; P < 0.001), global assessment scale (<0.001), and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (6247 vs. 2543 pg/mL; P = 0.033). Incident heart failure hospitalizations assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months were significantly reduced (P < 0.001 for all) in comparison with antecedent heart failure hospitalizations over the same time period. Cost expenditure was significantly lower at 3 (P < 0.001), 6 (P = 0.005), and 12 months (P = 0.001) after initiation of dobutamine. Mortality rate at 1 year was 48% with 9/12 (75%) patients dying at home, most often from progressive pump failure.ConclusionsContinuous intravenous home dobutamine in patients with palliative end-stage heart failure is feasible and associated with improved symptomatic status, heart failure hospitalizations, and health-care-related costs. Nevertheless, results should be interpreted in the context of the small and retrospective design. Larger studies are necessary to evaluate the effect of dobutamine in palliative end-stage heart failure.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of Risk-Adjusted Home Time After Hospitalization for Heart Failure as a Potential Hospital Performance Metric.

Importance

Objectives

Design, setting, and participants

Exposures

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Publications

Evaluation of Risk-Adjusted Home Time After Hospitalization for Heart Failure as a Potential Hospital Performance Metric.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets