Dataset Information

Co-creation of a health education program for improving the uptake of HIV self-testing among men in Rwanda: nominal group technique.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

This study sought to collaborate with key stakeholders to reach a consensus regarding the predominant barriers preventing the uptake of HIV testing services (HTS) by men and co-create an acceptable educational program to improve the knowledge of HIV self-testing (HIVST) among men in Rwanda.

Methods

We employed the nominal group technique to identify a consensus regarding the predominant barriers currently impeding the male uptake of HTS. The health education program content was guided by the ranked barriers. We applied Mezirow's Transformational Learning Theory for curriculum development.

Results

Eleven key barriers currently impeding the male uptake of HTS were identified in the nominal group process. The stakeholders co-created an interactive, structured curriculum containing information on the health locus of control; HIV etiology, transmission, diagnosis, status disclosure benefits, care and treatment services; and an overview of the HIVST background and test procedure to address multiple barriers.

Conclusion

Key stakeholders co-created a comprehensive health education program tailored to men, which integrates education about health beliefs, HIV/AIDS and HIVST. Further studies to assess the effectiveness of the program are needed. It is anticipated that the intervention will improve the uptake of HIVST among men in Kigali, Rwanda.

SUBMITTER: Dzinamarira T

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7610321 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Co-creation of a health education program for improving the uptake of HIV self-testing among men in Rwanda: nominal group technique.

Dzinamarira Tafadzwa T Mulindabigwi Augustin A Mashamba-Thompson Tivani Phosa TP

Heliyon 20201030 10

<h4>Objective</h4>This study sought to collaborate with key stakeholders to reach a consensus regarding the predominant barriers preventing the uptake of HIV testing services (HTS) by men and co-create an acceptable educational program to improve the knowledge of HIV self-testing (HIVST) among men in Rwanda.<h4>Methods</h4>We employed the nominal group technique to identify a consensus regarding the predominant barriers currently impeding the male uptake of HTS. The health education program cont ...[more]

PMID: 33163663

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo identify preferred burnout interventions within a resident physician population, utilizing the Nominal Group Technique. The results will be used to design a discrete choice experiment study to inform the development of resident burnout prevention programs.MethodsThree resident focus groups met (10-14 participants/group) to prioritize a list of 23 factors for burnout prevention programs. The Nominal Group Technique consisted of three steps: an individual, confidential ranking of the 23 factors by importance from 1 to 23, a group discussion of each attribute, including a group review of the rankings, and an opportunity to alter the original ranking across participants.ResultsThe total number of residents (36) were a representative sample of specialty, year of residency, and sex. There was strong agreement about the most highly rated attributes which grouped naturally into themes of autonomy, meaning, competency and relatedness. There was also disagreement on several of the attributes that is likely due to the differences in residency specialty and subsequently rotation requirements.ConclusionThis study identified the need to address multiple organizational factors that may lead to physician burnout. There is a clear need for complex interventions that target systemic and program level factors rather than focus on individual interventions. These results may help residency program directors understand the specific attributes of a burnout prevention program valued by residents. Aligning burnout interventions with resident preferences could improve the efficacy of burnout prevention programs by improving adoption of, and satisfaction with, these programs. Physician burnout is a work-related syndrome characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and a sense of reduced personal accomplishment [1]. Burnout is present in epidemic proportions and was estimated to occur in over 50 percent of practicing physicians and in up to 89 percent of resident physicians pre-COVID 19. The burnout epidemic is growing; a recent national survey of US physicians reported an 8.9 percent increase in burnout between 2011 and 2014 [2]. Rates of physician burnout have also increased [3] during the COVID-19 pandemic with a new classification of "pandemic burnout" experienced by over 52 percent of healthcare workers as early as June of 2020 [4]. Physician burnout can lead to depression, suicidal ideation, and relationship problems that may progress to substance abuse, increased interpersonal conflicts, broken relationships, low quality of life, major depression, and suicide [5-7]. The estimated rate of physician suicide is 300-400 annually [8-10].

Project description:BackgroundHealthcare systems globally are expanding community pharmacy services to meet patient needs and reduce healthcare costs. In England this includes helping community pharmacies to provide integrated professional services but concerns persist over quality of care. This study aimed to identify priorities from key stakeholders for improving the quality of professional community pharmacy services.MethodsSix homogenous nominal group (NG) discussions (face-to-face and online) involved 36 participants from diverse stakeholder backgrounds. Participants included patients (n = 10), community pharmacists (n = 7), general practitioners, a general practice-based pharmacist (n = 4), community pharmacy service regulators (n = 5), Community Pharmacy England members (n = 4), and Local Pharmaceutical Committee members (n = 6), both responsible for negotiating services. Delbecq's NG technique included silent idea generation, round-robin feedback, discussion, and ranking for consensus building. Discussions were audio-recorded and verbatim transcripts analysed thematically using NVivo12. Emerging themes across all NGDs were analysed by thematic analyses. Individual discrete ranking within each NGD were then combined by summing the mean scores of the categories within each theme.ResultsFive key themes emerged from qualitative analysis across all NGDs: quality service design, sustained funding, integration with the wider healthcare system, positioning community pharmacy as a hub for patient needs, and adequate workforce training, optimising staffing and retention. Participants emphasised the need for long-term commitment to quality service design centred on addressing local patient need, sustained and predictable funding. Community pharmacy staff having some access to patient records for making informed clinical decisions was discussed. Scoring priorities ranked as follows (highest to lowest): ensuring quality service design, sustained funding, integration with healthcare systems, community pharmacy as patient hubs, and workforce training and retention, reflecting different stakeholder priorities in these areas.ConclusionThis study highlighted core priority areas for a framework to improve the quality of community pharmacy professional services within a more responsive and integrated primary care led healthcare system.

Project description:ObjectivesAccess to healthcare and accurate health information is a persistent issue for people experiencing homelessness (PEH), one heightened by the COVID-19 pandemic and exacerbated by issues of health literacy and mistrust. Strategies involving community health workers (CHWs) have the potential to improve education and service delivery for PEH. The objective of this study is to assess PEH knowledge, attitudes and barriers to COVID-19 testing and vaccination, and the impact of CHW-led education within a homeless shelter in Indiana.Design/settingBetween November 2021 and April 2022, 15 sessions were held at a homeless shelter that combined focus group discussions with COVID-19-related education. Pre-/post-tests measured knowledge gains and attitude shifts among PEH. Guided by the socioecological model, thematic analysis of focus group transcripts identified key motivators and barriers to COVID-19 vaccination and testing.Participants78 PEH (73% male, 74% white, mean age=48).Outcome measuresCOVID-19-related knowledge gains and willingness to receive testing and vaccination among PEH.ResultsCompletion of an educational session was associated with a significant increase in knowledge scores (mean pre-test score=10.76/15, SD=2.16; mean post-test score=13.58/15, SD=1.72; p<0.001), with most participants (91%) improving by up to 10 points. The proportion of unvaccinated participants (42%) willing to be vaccinated increased from 21% to 39%. Participants willing to get tested for COVID-19 after a known exposure increased from 83% to 92%. Qualitative findings from the sessions provided insights into key knowledge gaps and revealed participant preferences towards health education format and topics.ConclusionCHW-led COVID-19 education increased knowledge gains and positively influenced attitudes towards vaccination and testing among PEH. Findings highlight the importance of tailored, community-driven interventions for pandemic response and emphasise the crucial role of education in building trust and promoting health literacy to improve health outcomes for vulnerable populations.

Project description:Prognosis is generally poor for patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. However, patients with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations (gBRCAm) may benefit from first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and maintenance therapy with the poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib following at least 16 weeks of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy without disease progression. Germline breast cancer gene (BRCA) testing is therefore important to ensure that patients receive the most effective treatment. In addition, testing for other DNA damage response gene mutations beyond gBRCAm may also guide treatment decisions. However, clinical pathways for genetic testing are often suboptimal, leading to delays in treatment initiation or missed opportunities for personalized therapy. Barriers to testing include low rates of referral and uptake, delays to referral and slow result turnaround times, cost, and biopsy and assay limitations if somatic testing is performed, leading to the requirement for subsequent dedicated germline testing. Low rates of referral may result from lack of awareness among physicians of the clinical value of testing, coupled with low confidence in interpreting test results and poor availability of genetic counseling services. Among patients, barriers to uptake may include similar lack of awareness of the clinical value of testing, anxiety regarding the implications of test results, lack of insurance coverage, fear of negative insurance implications, and socioeconomic factors. Potential solutions include innovative approaches to testing pathways, including 'mainstreaming' of testing in which BRCA tests are routinely arranged by the treating oncologist, with the involvement of genetic counselors if a patient is found to have a gBRCAm. More recently, the utility of multigene panel analyses has also been explored. Access to genetic counseling may also be improved through initiatives such as having a genetic counseling appointment for all new patient visits and telemedicine approaches, including the use of telephone consultations or DVD-assisted counseling. Educational programs will also be beneficial, and cost effectiveness is likely to improve as the number of targeted treatments increases and when the earlier detection of tumors in family members following cascade testing is considered.

Dataset Information

Co-creation of a health education program for improving the uptake of HIV self-testing among men in Rwanda: nominal group technique.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Co-creation of a health education program for improving the uptake of HIV self-testing among men in Rwanda: nominal group technique.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets