Dataset Information

A comparison of four serological assays for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human serum samples from different populations.

ABSTRACT: It is of paramount importance to evaluate the prevalence of both asymptomatic and symptomatic cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and their differing antibody response profiles. Here, we performed a pilot study of four serological assays to assess the amounts of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in serum samples obtained from 491 healthy individuals before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, 51 individuals hospitalized with COVID-19, 209 suspected cases of COVID-19 with mild symptoms, and 200 healthy blood donors. We used two ELISA assays that recognized the full-length nucleoprotein (N) or trimeric spike (S) protein ectodomain of SARS-CoV-2. In addition, we developed the S-Flow assay that recognized the S protein expressed at the cell surface using flow cytometry, and the luciferase immunoprecipitation system (LIPS) assay that recognized diverse SARS-CoV-2 antigens including the S1 domain and the carboxyl-terminal domain of N by immunoprecipitation. We obtained similar results with the four serological assays. Differences in sensitivity were attributed to the technique and the antigen used. High anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody titers were associated with neutralization activity, which was assessed using infectious SARS-CoV-2 or lentiviral-S pseudotype virus. In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, seroconversion and virus neutralization occurred between 5 and 14 days after symptom onset, confirming previous studies. Seropositivity was detected in 32% of mildly symptomatic individuals within 15 days of symptom onset and in 3% of healthy blood donors. The four antibody assays that we used enabled a broad evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence and antibody profiling in different subpopulations within one region.

SUBMITTER: Grzelak L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7665313 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A comparison of four serological assays for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human serum samples from different populations.

Grzelak Ludivine L Temmam Sarah S Planchais Cyril C Demeret Caroline C Tondeur Laura L Huon Christèle C Guivel-Benhassine Florence F Staropoli Isabelle I Chazal Maxime M Dufloo Jeremy J Planas Delphine D Buchrieser Julian J Rajah Maaran Michael MM Robinot Remy R Porrot Françoise F Albert Mélanie M Chen Kuang-Yu KY Crescenzo-Chaigne Bernadette B Donati Flora F Anna François F Souque Philippe P Gransagne Marion M Bellalou Jacques J Nowakowski Mireille M Backovic Marija M Bouadma Lila L Le Fevre Lucie L Le Hingrat Quentin Q Descamps Diane D Pourbaix Annabelle A Laouénan Cédric C Ghosn Jade J Yazdanpanah Yazdan Y Besombes Camille C Jolly Nathalie N Pellerin-Fernandes Sandrine S Cheny Olivia O Ungeheuer Marie-Noëlle MN Mellon Guillaume G Morel Pascal P Rolland Simon S Rey Felix A FA Behillil Sylvie S Enouf Vincent V Lemaitre Audrey A Créach Marie-Aude MA Petres Stephane S Escriou Nicolas N Charneau Pierre P Fontanet Arnaud A Hoen Bruno B Bruel Timothée T Eloit Marc M Mouquet Hugo H Schwartz Olivier O van der Werf Sylvie S

Science translational medicine 20200817 559

It is of paramount importance to evaluate the prevalence of both asymptomatic and symptomatic cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection and their differing antibody response profiles. Here, we performed a pilot study of four serological assays to assess the amounts of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in serum samples obtained from 491 healthy individuals before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, 51 individuals hospitalized with COVID-19, 209 suspected cases of COVID-19 with mild symptoms, and 200 healthy blood donors. We u ...[more]

PMID: 32817357

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundSerological testing for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) complements nucleic acid tests for patient diagnosis and enables monitoring of population susceptibility to inform the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic response. It is important to understand the reliability of assays with different antigen or antibody targets to detect humoral immunity after SARS-CoV-2 infection and to understand how antibody (Ab) binding assays compare to those detecting neutralizing antibody (nAb), particularly as we move into the era of vaccines.MethodsWe evaluated the performance of 6 commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), including a surrogate virus neutralization test (sVNT), for detection of SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulins (IgA, IgM, IgG), total or nAb. A result subset was compared with a cell culture-based microneutralization (MN) assay. We tested sera from patients with prior reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, prepandemic sera, and potential cross-reactive sera from patients with other non-COVID-19 acute infections.ResultsFor sera collected >14 days post-symptom onset, the assay achieving the highest sensitivity was the Wantai total Ab at 100% (95% CI, 94.6%-100%), followed by 93.1% for Euroimmun NCP-IgG, 93.1% for GenScript sVNT, 90.3% for Euroimmun S1-IgG, 88.9% for Euroimmun S1-IgA, and 83.3% for Wantai IgM. Specificity for the best-performing assay was 99.5% for the Wantai total Ab, and for the lowest-performing assay it was 97.1% for sVNT (as per the Instructions for Use [IFU]). The Wantai Total Ab had the best agreement with MN at 98% followed by Euroimmun S1-IgA, Euro NCP-IgG, and sVNT (as per IFU) with 97%, 97% and 95%, respectively; Wantai IgM had the poorest agreement at 93%.ConclusionsPerformance characteristics of the SARS-CoV-2 serology assays detecting different antibody types are consistent with those found in previously published reports. Evaluation of the surrogate virus neutralization test in comparison to the Ab binding assays and a cell culture-based neutralization assay showed good result correlation between all assays. However, correlation between the cell-based neutralization test and some assays detecting Ab's not specifically involved in neutralization was higher than with the sVNT. This study demonstrates the reliability of different assays to detect the humoral immune response following SARS-CoV-2 infection, which can be used to optimize serological test algorithms for assessing antibody responses post-SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination.

Project description:BackgroundVedolizumab (VDZ) is an anti-α 4 β 7 integrin monoclonal antibody approved for inflammatory bowel disease treatment. VDZ serum and antidrug antibody (ADA) concentrations may be used for treatment optimization. In this article, the results of 5 commercial assays (Grifols, Immundiagnostik, Progenika, Sanquin, and Theradiag) measuring VDZ concentration and ADA were compared with those of the reference assays used in VDZ clinical studies. Our findings will assist clinicians in interpreting commercial assay results in the context of VDZ clinical trial data.MethodsVDZ-treated patient samples were used to evaluate the agreement between commercial assays and the reference VDZ serum concentration assay, based on linear regression, Bland-Altman, and qualitative agreement analyses. VDZ ADAs were detected using qualitative assays. Specificity, selectivity, accuracy, and precision were assessed using serum samples from healthy donors or patients with IBD (VDZ serum concentration <0.5 mcg/mL) spiked with VDZ, with/without other biologics (identical sample sets per assay).ResultsAll assays were specific and selective for VDZ. Overall, the commercial assay results for VDZ-spiked samples correlated well with those of the reference serum concentration assay (R 2 ≥ 0.98). Compared with the Immundiagnostik and Theradiag assays, the Grifols, Sanquin, and Progenika assays had the best reference assay agreement (based on regression analysis, Bland-Altman plots, and qualitative agreement [Cohen's kappa ≥0.92]). All immunogenicity assays detected VDZ ADAs; only the reference assay detected VDZ ADAs in the presence of 15 mcg/mL VDZ, advising caution with commercial ADA assays if VDZ is present.ConclusionsAll 5 commercial assays are suitable for VDZ therapeutic monitoring and ADA testing. However, the absolute values from the reference assays and the different commercial assays were not comparable, indicating that the same assay must be used for repeated monitoring of VDZ serum concentrations.

Dataset Information

A comparison of four serological assays for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human serum samples from different populations.

Publications

A comparison of four serological assays for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in human serum samples from different populations.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets