Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Importance
The overwhelming majority of fetal and neonatal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Fetal and neonatal risk assessment tools may be useful to predict the risk of death.Objective
To develop risk prediction models for intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death.Design, setting, and participants
This cohort study used data from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research population-based vital registry, including clinical sites in South Asia (India and Pakistan), Africa (Democratic Republic of Congo, Zambia, and Kenya), and Latin America (Guatemala). A total of 502 648 pregnancies were prospectively enrolled in the registry.Exposures
Risk factors were added sequentially into the data set in 4 scenarios: (1) prenatal, (2) predelivery, (3) delivery and day 1, and (4) postdelivery through day 2.Main outcomes and measures
Data sets were randomly divided into 10 groups of 3 analysis data sets including training (60%), test (20%), and validation (20%). Conventional and advanced machine learning modeling techniques were applied to assess predictive abilities using area under the curve (AUC) for intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal mortality.Results
All prenatal and predelivery models had predictive accuracy for both intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal mortality with AUC values 0.71 or less. Five of 6 models for neonatal mortality based on delivery/day 1 and postdelivery/day 2 had increased predictive accuracy with AUC values greater than 0.80. Birth weight was the most important predictor for neonatal death in both postdelivery scenarios with independent predictive ability with AUC values of 0.78 and 0.76, respectively. The addition of 4 other top predictors increased AUC to 0.83 and 0.87 for the postdelivery scenarios, respectively.Conclusions and relevance
Models based on prenatal or predelivery data had predictive accuracy for intrapartum stillbirths and neonatal mortality of AUC values 0.71 or less. Models that incorporated delivery data had good predictive accuracy for risk of neonatal mortality. Birth weight was the most important predictor for neonatal mortality.
SUBMITTER: Shukla VV
PROVIDER: S-EPMC7675108 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Nov
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Shukla Vivek V VV Eggleston Barry B Ambalavanan Namasivayam N McClure Elizabeth M EM Mwenechanya Musaku M Chomba Elwyn E Bose Carl C Bauserman Melissa M Tshefu Antoinette A Goudar Shivaprasad S SS Derman Richard J RJ Garcés Ana A Krebs Nancy F NF Saleem Sarah S Goldenberg Robert L RL Patel Archana A Hibberd Patricia L PL Esamai Fabian F Bucher Sherri S Liechty Edward A EA Koso-Thomas Marion M Carlo Waldemar A WA
JAMA network open 20201102 11
<h4>Importance</h4>The overwhelming majority of fetal and neonatal deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries. Fetal and neonatal risk assessment tools may be useful to predict the risk of death.<h4>Objective</h4>To develop risk prediction models for intrapartum stillbirth and neonatal death.<h4>Design, setting, and participants</h4>This cohort study used data from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Global Network for Women's and Children's ...[more]