Dataset Information

Soft Tissue Mobilization and Stretching for Shoulder in CrossFitters: A Randomized Pilot Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The shoulder in CrossFit should have a balance between mobility and stability. Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and posterior shoulder stiffness are risk factors for overhead shoulder injury.

Objective

To determine the effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and horizontal adduction stretch in CrossFit practitioners' shoulders.

Methods

Twenty-one regular CrossFitters were allocated to experimental (stretching with isometric contraction and instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization) or control groups (instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization). Each session lasted 5 min, 2 days a week, over a period of 4 weeks. Shoulder internal rotation and horizontal adduction (digital inclinometer), as well as posterior shoulder stretch perception (Park scale), were evaluated. Shapiro-Wilk test was used to analyze the distribution of the sample. Parametric Student's t-test was used to obtain the intragroup differences. The inter- and intra-rater differences were calculated using a repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results

Average age was 30.81 years (SD: 5.35), with an average height of 178 (SD: 7.93) cm and average weight of 82.69 (SD: 10.82) kg. Changes were found in the experimental group following intervention (p < 0.05), and when comparing baseline and follow-up assessments (p < 0.05) in all variables. Significant differences were found in the control group following intervention (p < 0.05), in right horizontal adduction and left internal rotation. When comparing the perception of internal rotation and horizontal adduction in both groups, significant differences were found.

Conclusions

Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization can improve shoulder horizontal adduction and internal rotation. An instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization technique yields the same results alone as those achieved in combination with post-isometric stretch with shoulder adduction.

SUBMITTER: Jusdado-Garcia M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7826662 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Soft Tissue Mobilization and Stretching for Shoulder in CrossFitters: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Jusdado-García Marcos M Cuesta-Barriuso Rubén R

International journal of environmental research and public health 20210112 2

<h4>Background</h4>The shoulder in CrossFit should have a balance between mobility and stability. Glenohumeral internal rotation deficit and posterior shoulder stiffness are risk factors for overhead shoulder injury.<h4>Objective</h4>To determine the effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization and horizontal adduction stretch in CrossFit practitioners' shoulders.<h4>Methods</h4>Twenty-one regular CrossFitters were allocated to experimental (stretching with isometric contraction ...[more]

PMID: 33445505

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe association between hamstring tightness and knee osteoarthritis (KOA) is significant because tight hamstrings can put more strain on the knee joint, reduce its range of motion, and cause compensatory movements that worsen the KOA.ObjectiveTo compare the effects of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) and proprioceptive neuromuscular (PNF) on hamstring flexibility in patients with KOA.MethodsData for the randomized controlled trial (NCT05110326) was collected from n = 60 participants randomly divided into group A received IASTM and group B received PNF stretching. In group A, the therapist made 30 strokes gentle strokes with the tool from the origin to the insertion while holding the plane at a 45-degree angle over the treatment area. In group B, PNF stretching was done with three repetitions and 10 seconds rest between each, after isometric contraction of the hamstring muscle using approximately 50% of their maximum strength, holding it for 8 seconds, and then releasing it. A 30-minute session was given to each patient three times per week and was given for 6 weeks. Outcome measures were the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain intensity, the active knee extension test (AKET) for hamstring flexibility, and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) for the health status of KOA patients.ResultsThe study found a significant interaction (p < 0.001) between interventions and time across several measurements. After 6 weeks, both interventions resulted in significant improvements (p < 0.001) across all dependent variables, with group A (IASTM) showing more significant improvement in hamstring flexibility, pain reduction, and health status (p < 0.001) compared to group B (PNF).ConclusionsBoth the IASTM technique and PNF stretching resulted in increased hamstring flexibility, decreased pain, and enhanced general health. The IASTM technique, however, showed potential benefits over PNF stretching in terms of flexibility, pain relief, and public health enhancement. Physical therapists and manual therapists may prioritize the usage of the IASTM technique for patients who want to make significant changes in these areas.

Project description:BackgroundIn subacromial pain syndrome (SPS), it is unknown whether posterior shoulder stretching exercises (PSSE) with rapid eccentric contraction, a muscle energy technique, improve clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes more than no stretching or static PSSE.HypothesisPSSE with rapid eccentric contraction is superior to no stretching and static PSSE in improving clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes in SPS.Study designRandomized controlled trial.Level of evidenceLevel 1.MethodsSeventy patients with SPS and glenohumeral internal rotation deficit were randomized into the modified cross-body stretching with rapid eccentric contraction group (EMCBS; n = 24), static MCBS group (SMCBS; n = 23), or control group (CG; n = 23). In addition to 4-week physical therapy, EMCBS received PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction, SMCBS static PSSE, and CG no PSSE. The primary outcome was internal rotation range of motion (ROM). Secondary outcomes were posterior shoulder tightness, external rotation ROM (ERROM), pain, modified Constant-Murley score, short form of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH), rotator cuff strength, acromiohumeral distance (AHD), supraspinatus tendon thickness, and supraspinatus tendon occupation ratio (STOR).ResultsShoulder mobility, pain, function and disability, strength, AHD, and STOR improved in all groups (P < 0.05).ConclusionIn patients with SPS, PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction and static PSSE were superior to no stretching in improving clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes. Stretching with rapid eccentric contraction was not superior to static stretching, but improved ERROM compared with no stretching.Clinical relevanceIn SPS, both PSSE with rapid eccentric contraction and static PSSE included in physical therapy program are beneficial to improve posterior shoulder mobility and other clinical and ultrasonographic outcomes. In the case of ERROM deficiency, rapid eccentric contraction might be preferred.

Project description:PurposeThe purpose was to compare the effects of manual lymphatic drainage and soft tissue mobilization on pain threshold, shoulder mobility and quality of life in patients with axillary web syndrome.MethodsThis randomized clinical trial was conducted on 36 breast cancer patients with developed axillary web; participants were randomly divided into two groups. One group was treated with manual lymphatic drainage; the other group was treated with soft tissue mobilizations in addition to therapeutic exercises, i.e., stretching, strengthening and range of motion (ROM) exercises. The duration of treatment was four weeks (5 sessions/week), with therapeutic exercises as a common treatment protocol. Outcome measures were Breast-Cancer specific quality of life questionnaires, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Patient Specific Functional Scale (PSFS), Dynamometer and Goniometer. All outcome measure readings were recorded at baseline and the end (4th week) of the treatment.ResultsThe compliance of the variable distribution with normal distribution was verified using the Shaphiro-Wilk test. Parametric tests were applied, and both groups showed significant effects (p < 0.05) in pairwise comparison (paired t-test). The comparison group analysis (independent t-test) showed that there was no significant difference in pain, upper limb strength, range of motions and fatigue component of quality of life questionnaire parameters (p > 0.05). Two parameters (DASH, PSFS) and one component of the quality of life questionnaire (global health) showed a significant difference (p < 0.05).ConclusionManual lymphatic drainage showed more improvement in functional movements. It was concluded that both groups, manual lymphatic drainage and soft tissue mobilization groups were clinically equally effective.Trial registration numberThis trial is registered at ClinicalTrial.gov PRS under trial number NCT05463185 on date 18/07/2022.

Project description:BackgroundFollowing surgery for soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum, the predominant pattern of failure is local recurrence, which remains the main cause of death. Radiotherapy is utilized to reduce recurrence rates but the efficacy of this strategy has not been definitely established. As treatment tolerability is more favorable with preoperative radiotherapy, normofractionated neoadjuvant treatment is the current approach. The final results of the prospective, randomized STRASS (EORTC 62092) trial, which compared the efficacy of this combined treatment to that of surgery alone, are still awaited; preliminary results presented at the 2019 ASCO Annual Meeting indicated that combined treatment is associated with better local control in patients with liposarcoma (74.5% of the cohort, 11% benefit in abdominal progression free survival after 3 years, p = 0.049). Particles allow better sparing of surrounding tissues at risk, e.g., bowel epithelium, and carbon ions additionally offer biologic advantages and are preferred in slow growing tumors. Furthermore, hypofractionation allows for a significantly shorter treatment interval with a lower risk of progression during radiotherapy.Methods and designWe present a prospective, randomized, monocentric phase II trial. Patients with resectable or marginally resectable, histologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of the retroperitoneum will be randomized between neoadjuvant proton or neoadjuvant carbon ion radiotherapy in active scanning beam application technique (39 Gy [relative biological effectiveness, RBE] in 13 fractions [5-6 fractions per week] in each arm). The primary objective is the safety and feasibility based on the proportion of grade 3-5 toxicity (CTCAE, version 5.0) in the first 12 months after surgery or discontinuation of treatment for any reason related to the treatment. Local control, local progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life are the secondary endpoints of the study.DiscussionThe aim of this study is to confirm that hypofractionated, accelerated preoperative radiotherapy is safe and feasible. The rationale for the use of particle therapy is the potential for reduced toxicity. The data will lay the groundwork for a randomized phase III trial comparing hypofractionated proton and carbon ion irradiation with regard to local control.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT04219202 . Retrospectively registered on January 6, 2020.

Project description:BackgroundThe standard of care treatment for soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities is a wide resection in combination with pre- or postoperative radiotherapy with high local control rates, sparing patients the necessity of amputation without compromising on overall survival rates. The currently preferred timing of radiotherapy is under debate. Albeit having higher rates of acute wound complications, late side effects like fibrosis, joint stiffness or edema are less frequent in preoperative compared to postoperative radiotherapy. This can be explained in smaller treatment volumes and a lower dose in the preoperative setting. Particles allow better sparing of surrounding tissues at risk, and carbon ions additionally offer biologic advantages and are preferred in less radiosensitive tumors. Hypofractionation allows for a significantly shorter treatment duration.MethodsExtrem-ion is a prospective, randomized, monocentric phase II trial. Patients with resectable or marginally resectable, histologically confirmed soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities will be randomized between neoadjuvant proton or neoadjuvant carbon ion radiotherapy in active scanning beam application technique (39 Gy [relative biological effectiveness, RBE] in 13 fractions [5-6 fractions per week] in each arm). The primary objective is the proportion of therapies without wound healing disorder the first 120 days after surgery or discontinuation of treatment for any reason related to the treatment. The secondary endpoints of the study consist of local control, local progression-free survival, disease-free survival, overall survival, and quality of life.DiscussionThe aim of this study is to confirm that hypofractionated, preoperative radiotherapy is safe and feasible. The potential for reduced toxicity by the utilization of particle therapy is the rational of this trial. A subsequent randomized phase III trial will compare the hypofractionated proton and carbon ion irradiation in regards to local control.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04946357 ; Retrospectively registered June 30, 2021.

Dataset Information

Soft Tissue Mobilization and Stretching for Shoulder in CrossFitters: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Soft Tissue Mobilization and Stretching for Shoulder in CrossFitters: A Randomized Pilot Study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets