Dataset Information

Effectiveness of EGFR-TKI rechallenge immediately after PD-1 blockade failure.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There is currently insufficient information available on effective therapies that can be administered to patients with non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) who develop resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, sequential treatment via programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade followed by EGFR-TKI rechallenge is suggested to improve the therapeutic efficacy in such patients.

Methods

A total of 75 patients with advanced NSCLC harboring sensitive EGFR mutations treated with afatinib, erlotinib, or gefitinib after EGFR-TKI treatment failure were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 13 patients were treated with EGFR-TKI rechallenge immediately after the failure of PD-1 blockade therapy (experimental group) and the remaining 62 patients did not receive PD-1 inhibitor therapy before EGFR-TKI rechallenge (control group). Blood samples were collected at two time points; before the initiation of anti-PD-1 therapy and at EGFR-TKI rechallenge.

Results

The objective response rates of EGFR-TKI rechallenge in the experimental and control groups were 46.1% and 16.1%, respectively, with a significant difference (p = 0.026). In the experimental group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after EGFR-TKI rechallenge were 5.0 and 25.0 months, respectively, and no statistically significant difference in the percentage of lymphocytes before immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy and EGFR-TKIs was observed in patients with partial response (PR) and without PR after EGFR-TKI rechallenge. In particular, the sequential treatment of PD-1 blockade therapy followed by EGFR-TKI rechallenge was consecutively repeated three times in two out of 13 patients in the experimental group, and EGFR-TKI rechallenge consecutively for the third time yielded a PR without increased toxicities.

Conclusions

EGFR-TKI rechallenge immediately after PD-1 blockade treatment was identified as an effective therapy for NSCLC patients with resistance to EGFR-TKIs.

SUBMITTER: Kaira K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC7952801 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Effectiveness of EGFR-TKI rechallenge immediately after PD-1 blockade failure.

Kaira Kyoichi K Kobayashi Kunihiko K Shiono Ayako A Yamaguchi Ou O Hashimoto Kosuke K Mouri Atsuto A Shinomiya Shun S Miura Yu Y Imai Hisao H Kagamu Hiroshi H

Thoracic cancer 20210131 6

<h4>Background</h4>There is currently insufficient information available on effective therapies that can be administered to patients with non-small cell cancer (NSCLC) who develop resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, sequential treatment via programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade followed by EGFR-TKI rechallenge is suggested to improve the therapeutic efficacy in such patients.<h4>Methods</h4>A total of 75 patients with advanced NSCLC harbor ...[more]

PMID: 33522139

Similar Datasets

Project description:For patients with metastatic RAS/RAF wild-type refractory colorectal cancer, the question of anti-EGFR therapy rechallenge often comes up after initial use. However, not all patients derive benefit. It is now well known that these tumors acquire mechanisms of resistance in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway, which can be detected on circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)-based testing. We present a series of patients who had serial testing post-EGFR blockade showing its feasibility and value. This would have implications for EGFR rechallenge. We reviewed records for patients who were initially noted to be RAS/RAF wild-type on tissue, who received prior anti-EGFR therapy and then subsequently had at least one circulating tumor DNA-based testing. These patients also had tissue-based genomic testing obtained earlier as part of their standard of care, alongside serial ctDNA-based testing that was done later when subsequent lines of therapy were being decided. The median duration of initial prior anti-EGFR therapy was around 10 months. Known acquired mechanisms of resistance were noted in 100% of the cases. These included KRAS, NRAS, extracellular domain mutations in EGFR, and BRAF mutations. Interestingly, the levels of the sub-clones expressed in variant allele fraction percentage varied and decreased over time in relation to timing of the prior EGFR exposure. Additionally, these were noted to be polyclonal, and the number of clones also varied including some disappearing over time during non-EGFR-based therapy (EGFR holiday). Patients' post-EGFR blockade may have multiple mechanisms of acquired resistance that can be easily detected on non-invasive liquid biopsies. These patients do not benefit from EGFR rechallenge based on the results of the recently reported CRICKET (NCT02296203) and CAVE (NCT04561336) clinical trials. Furthermore, excluding these patients from EGFR rechallenge is already being adopted in prospectively done clinical trials, e.g., the CHRONOS study (NCT03227926). Rechecking the liquid biopsy plasma RAS/RAF status is one thing that may be incorporated into practice with EGFR rechallenge only a consideration if acquired mechanisms of resistance are absent.

Project description:PurposeDrug repurposing offers the opportunity for chemotherapy to be used to reestablish sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. Here we investigated the clinical and translational aspects of an early phase II study of azacitidine and carboplatin priming for anti-PDL1 immunotherapy (avelumab) in patients with advanced ICB-resistant melanoma.Experimental designA total of 20 participants with ICB-resistant metastatic melanoma received 2 × 4-week cycles of azacitidine and carboplatin followed by ICB rechallenge with anti-PD-L1 avelumab. The primary objective was overall response rate after priming and ICB rechallenge. Secondary objectives were clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Translational correlation analysis of HLA-A and PD-L1 expression, RNA sequencing, and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing of biopsies at baseline, after priming and after six cycles of avelmuab was performed.ResultsThe overall response rate (ORR) determined after azacitidine and carboplatin priming was 10% (2/20) with two partial responses (PR). The ORR determined after priming followed by six cycles of avelumab (week 22) was 10%, with 2 of 20 participants achieving immune partial response (iPR). The CBR for azacitidine and carboplatin priming was 65% (13/20) and after priming followed by six cycles of avelumab CBR was 35% (n = 7/20). The median PFS was 18.0 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.87-21.13 weeks] and the median OS was 47.86 weeks (95% CI: 9.67-86.06 weeks). Translational correlation analysis confirmed HLA-A generally increased after priming with azacitidine and carboplatin, particularly if it was absent at the start of treatment. Average methylation of CpGs across the HLA-A locus was decreased after priming and T cells, in particular CD8+, showed the greatest increase in infiltration.ConclusionsPriming with azacitidine and carboplatin can induce disease stabilization and resensitization to ICB for metastatic melanoma.SignificanceThere are limited treatments for melanoma once resistance to ICB occurs. Chemotherapy induces immune-related responses and may be repurposed to reinstate the response to ICB. This study provides the first evidence that chemotherapy can provide clinical benefit and increase OS for ICB-resistant melanoma.

Project description:Background: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in combination with programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors become the potential treatment modality for patients undergoing unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) in the first-line setting. However, the efficacy and safety of this combination regimen in patients after sorafenib failure remains unclear. Methods: Participants in this study included patients with uHCC after sorafenib failure who received TKI monotherapy (TKI group) or TKI combined with PD-1 inhibitors therapy (combination group) in our center from July 2018 to July 2021. The overall survival (OS) was used to be the primary efficacy endpoint, while progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) were applied to be secondary endpoints. In addition, the adverse events are recorded and evaluated. Results: Among the 92 patients contained in this work, 50 patients were categorized into the TKI group, while 42 patients were in the combination group. There existed no evident differences between the two groups concerning the ORR (8.0% vs. 9.5%, p = 1.000). However, the DCR in the combined group was better in relative to that in the TKI group (71.4% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.037). In comparison with the TKI group, it was found that the combination group presented notably better median PFS (8.1 months vs. 4.7 months, p = 0.005) and median OS (21.9 months vs. 16.6 months, p = 0.042). According to multivariate analysis, PFS (HR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-0.8, p = 0.005) and OS (HR 0.5, 95% CI: 0.3-1.0, p = 0.051) were improved in the combination group in relative to the TKI group after the adjustment for some risk factors. Additionally, the incidence rates of grade ≥1 adverse event in the TKI group and the combination group were 96.0% and 97.6%, respectively. The most normal adverse event in the TKI group was neutropenia (n = 24,48.0%) and the combination group was hypoalbuminemia (n = 23,54.8%). All of these adverse events improved after symptomatic treatment, and no new toxic events were found to occur. Conclusion: TKI combined with PD-1 inhibitors showed better prognosis with manageable toxicity in uHCC patients after sorafenib failure compared with TKI monotherapy.

Project description:PurposeWe aimed to evaluate whether the addition of pemetrexed is effective in improving progression-free survival (PFS) in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated patients with or without concomitant alterations.Materials and methodsThis multicenter clinical trial was conducted in China from June 15, 2018, to May 31, 2019. A total of 92 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR-sensitive mutations were included and divided into concomitant and non-concomitant groups. Patients in each group were randomly treated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy or EGFR-TKI combined with pemetrexed in a ratio of 1:1. PFS was recorded as the primary endpoint.ResultsThe overall median PFS of this cohort was 10.1 months. There were no significant differences in PFS between patients with and without concomitant and between patients received TKI monotherapy and TKI combined with pemetrexed (p=0.210 and p=0.085, respectively). Stratification analysis indicated that patients received TKI monotherapy had a significantly longer PFS in non-concomitant group than that in concomitant group (p=0.002). In concomitant group, patients received TKI combined with pemetrexed had a significantly longer PFS than patients received TKI monotherapy (p=0.013). Molecular dynamic analysis showed rapidly emerging EGFR T790M in patients received TKI monotherapy. EGFR mutation abundance decreased in patients received TKI combined chemotherapy, which supports better efficacy for a TKI combined chemotherapy as compared to TKI monotherapy. A good correlation between therapeutic efficacy and a change in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status was found in 66% of patients, supporting the guiding role of ctDNA minimal residual disease (MRD) in NSCLC treatment.ConclusionEGFR-TKI monotherapy is applicable to EGFR-sensitive patients without concomitant alterations, while a TKI combined chemotherapy is applicable to EGFR-sensitive patients with concomitant alterations. CtDNA MRD may be a potential biomarker for predicting therapeutic efficacy.

Dataset Information

Effectiveness of EGFR-TKI rechallenge immediately after PD-1 blockade failure.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Effectiveness of EGFR-TKI rechallenge immediately after PD-1 blockade failure.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets