Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Precision medicine and the principle of equal treatment: a conjoint analysis.


ABSTRACT:

Background

In precision medicine biomarkers stratify patients into groups that are offered different treatments, but this may conflict with the principle of equal treatment. While some patient characteristics are seen as relevant for unequal treatment and others not, it is known that they all may influence treatment decisions. How biomarkers influence these decisions is not known, nor is their ethical relevance well discussed.

Methods

We distributed an email survey designed to elicit treatment preferences from Norwegian doctors working with cancer patients. In a forced-choice conjoint analysis pairs of hypothetical patients were presented, and we calculated the average marginal component effect of seven individual patient characteristics, to estimate how each of them influence doctors' priority-setting decisions.

Results

A positive biomarker status increased the probability of being allocated the new drug, while older age, severe comorbidity and reduced physical function reduced the probability. Importantly, sex, education level and smoking status had no significant influence on the decision.

Conclusion

Biomarker status is perceived as relevant for priority setting decisions, alongside more well-known patient characteristics like age, physical function and comorbidity. Based on our results, we discuss a framework that can help clarify whether biomarker status should be seen as an ethically acceptable factor for providing unequal treatment to patients with the same disease.

SUBMITTER: Tranvag EJ 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8108369 | biostudies-literature | 2021 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Precision medicine and the principle of equal treatment: a conjoint analysis.

Tranvåg Eirik Joakim EJ   Strand Roger R   Ottersen Trygve T   Norheim Ole Frithjof OF  

BMC medical ethics 20210510 1


<h4>Background</h4>In precision medicine biomarkers stratify patients into groups that are offered different treatments, but this may conflict with the principle of equal treatment. While some patient characteristics are seen as relevant for unequal treatment and others not, it is known that they all may influence treatment decisions. How biomarkers influence these decisions is not known, nor is their ethical relevance well discussed.<h4>Methods</h4>We distributed an email survey designed to eli  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5839702 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4280791 | biostudies-literature
2020-01-27 | GSE143897 | GEO
2024-06-10 | MSV000094966 | MassIVE
| S-EPMC7272286 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7215369 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10319606 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5394976 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6954820 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9763792 | biostudies-literature