Dataset Information

Evaluation of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Treatment and Mortality Among Women With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

To our knowledge, there is no consensus regarding differences in treatment and mortality between non-Hispanic African American and non-Hispanic White women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Little is known about whether racial disparities vary by sociodemographic, clinical, and neighborhood factors.

Objective

To examine the differences in clinical treatment and outcomes between African American and White women in a nationally representative cohort of patients with TNBC and further examine the contributions of sociodemographic, clinical, and neighborhood factors to TNBC outcome disparities.

Design, setting, and participants

This population-based, retrospective cohort study included 23 123 women who received a diagnosis of nonmetastatic TNBC between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015, followed up through December 31, 2016, and identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data set. The study was conducted from July 2019 to November 2020. The analyses were performed from July 2019 to June 2020.

Exposures

Race and ethnicity, including non-Hispanic African American and non-Hispanic White race.

Main outcomes and measures

Using logistic regression analysis and competing risk regression analysis, we estimated odds ratios (ORs) of receipt of treatment and hazard ratios (HRs) of breast cancer mortality in African American patients compared with White patients.

Results

Of 23 213 participants, 5881 (25.3%) were African American women and 17 332 (74.7%) were White women. Compared with White patients, African American patients had lower odds of receiving surgery (OR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60-0.79) and chemotherapy (OR, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81-0.99) after adjustment for sociodemographic, clinicopathologic, and county-level factors. During a 43-month follow-up, 3276 patients (14.2%) died of breast cancer. The HR of breast cancer mortality was 1.28 (95% CI, 1.18-1.38) for African American individuals after adjustment for sociodemographic and county-level factors. Further adjustment for clinicopathological and treatment factors reduced the HR to 1.16 (95% CI, 1.06-1.25). This association was observed in patients living in socioeconomically less deprived counties (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.14-1.39), urban patients (HR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11-1.32), patients having stage II (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.02-1.39) or III (HR, 1.15; 95% CI, 1.01-1.31) tumors that were treated with chemotherapy, and patients younger than 65 years (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.12-1.37).

Conclusions and relevance

In this retrospective cohort study, African American women with nonmetastatic TNBC had a significantly higher risk of breast cancer mortality compared with their White counterparts, which was partially explained by their disparities in receipt of surgery and chemotherapy.

SUBMITTER: Cho B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8120441 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Evaluation of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Treatment and Mortality Among Women With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Cho Beomyoung B Han Yunan Y Lian Min M Colditz Graham A GA Weber Jason D JD Ma Cynthia C Liu Ying Y

JAMA oncology 20210701 7

<h4>Importance</h4>To our knowledge, there is no consensus regarding differences in treatment and mortality between non-Hispanic African American and non-Hispanic White women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Little is known about whether racial disparities vary by sociodemographic, clinical, and neighborhood factors.<h4>Objective</h4>To examine the differences in clinical treatment and outcomes between African American and White women in a nationally representative cohort of patients w ...[more]

PMID: 33983438

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThere are few data on state variation in racial and ethnic disparities in incidence of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in the US, limiting the ability to inform state-level health policy developments toward breast cancer equity.ObjectiveTo quantify between and within racial and ethnic disparities in TNBC incidence rates (IRs) among US women across states.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study using population-based cancer registry data included data for all women with TNBC diagnosed from January 1, 2015, to December 31, 2019, identified in the US Cancer Statistics Public Use Research Database. Data were analyzed from July through November 2022.ExposuresState and race and ethnicity (Hispanic, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native, non-Hispanic Asian or Pacific Islander, non-Hispanic Black, or non-Hispanic White) abstracted from medical records.Main outcomes and measuresThe main outcomes were diagnosis of TNBC, age-standardized IR per 100 000 women, state-specific incidence rate ratios (IRRs) using the rate among White women in each state as a reference for between-population disparities, and state-specific IRRs using the race and ethnicity-specific national rate as a reference for within-population disparities.ResultsThe study included data for 133 579 women; 768 (0.6%) were American Indian or Alaska Native; 4969 (3.7%), Asian or Pacific Islander; 28 710 (21.5%), Black; 12 937 (9.7%), Hispanic; and 86 195 (64.5%), White. The TNBC IR was highest among Black women (25.2 per 100 000 women), followed by White (12.9 per 100 000 women), American Indian or Alaska Native (11.2 per 100 000 women), Hispanic (11.1 per 100 000 women), and Asian or Pacific Islander (9.0 per 100 000 women) women. Racial and ethnic group-specific and state-specific rates substantially varied, ranging from less than 7 per 100 000 women among Asian or Pacific Islander women in Oregon and Pennsylvania to greater than 29 per 100 000 women among Black women in Delaware, Missouri, Louisiana, and Mississippi. Compared with White women, IRRs were statistically significantly higher in 38 of 38 states among Black women, ranging from 1.38 (95% CI, 1.10-1.70; IR, 17.4 per 100 000 women) in Colorado to 2.32 (95% CI, 1.90-2.81; IR, 32.0 per 100 000 women) in Delaware; lower in 22 of 22 states among Asian or Pacific Islander women, varying from 0.50 (95% CI, 0.34-0.70; IR, 5.7 per 100 000 women) in Oregon to 0.82 (95% CI, 0.75-0.90; IR, 10.5 per 100 000 women) in New York; and did not differ among Hispanic and American Indian or Alaska Native women in 22 of 35 states and 5 of 8 states, respectively. State variations within each racial and ethnic population were smaller but still substantial. For example, among White women, compared with the national rate, IRRs varied from 0.72 (95% CI, 0.66-0.78; IR, 9.2 per 100 000 women) in Utah to 1.18 (95% CI, 1.11-1.25; IR, 15.2 per 100 000 women) in Iowa, 1.15 (95% CI, 1.07-1.24; IR, 14.8 per 100 000 women) in Mississippi, and 1.15 (95% CI, 1.07-1.24; IR, 14.8 per 100 000 women) in West Virginia.Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, there were substantial state variations in racial and ethnic disparities in TNBC incidence, with Black women in Delaware, Missouri, Louisiana, and Mississippi having the highest rates among all states and racial and ethnic populations. The findings suggest that more research is needed to identify factors contributing to the substantial geographic variations in racial and ethnic disparities in TNBC incidence to develop effective preventive measures and that social determinants of health contribute to the geographic disparities in TNBC risk.

Project description:BackgroundRacial and ethnic disparities in heart disease mortality by initial treatment type among breast cancer survivors have not been well described.MethodsWe included 739 557 women diagnosed with first primary invasive breast cancer between 2000 and 2017 (aged 18-84 years, received surgery, survived ≥1 year, followed through 2018) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-18 database. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs; observed over expected) were calculated by race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic/Latina Asian American, Native Hawaiians, and other Pacific Islanders [AANHPI]; non-Hispanic/Latina Black [Black]; Hispanic/Latina [Latina]; and non-Hispanic/Latina White [White]) and initial treatment (surgery only; chemotherapy with surgery; chemotherapy, radiotherapy, with surgery; and radiotherapy with surgery) compared with the racial- and ethnic-matched general population, and by clinical characteristics. Cumulative heart disease mortality was estimated accounting for competing risks.ResultsSMRs were elevated for Black and Latina women treated with surgery only and chemotherapy with surgery (SMR range = 1.15-1.21) and AANHPI women treated with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, with surgery (SMR = 1.29; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.11 to 1.48), whereas SMRs were less than 1 for White women (SMR range = 0.70-0.96). SMRs were especially high for women with advanced (regional or distant) stage among Black women for all treatment (range = 1.15-2.89) and for AANHPI and Latina women treated with chemotherapy with surgery (range = 1.28-3.61). Non-White women diagnosed at younger than age 60 years had higher SMRs, as did Black and AANHPI women diagnosed with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers. Black women had the highest 10-year cumulative risk of heart disease mortality: aged younger than 60 years (Black: 1.78%, 95% CI = 1.63% to 1.94%) compared with White, AANHPI, and Latina women (<1%) and aged 60 years and older (Black: 7.92%, 95% CI = 7.53% to 8.33%) compared with White, AANHPI, and Latina women (range = 3.90%-6.48%).ConclusionsOur findings illuminated striking racial and ethnic disparities in heart disease mortality among Black, AANHPI, and Latina breast cancer survivors, especially after initial chemotherapy receipt.

Project description:BackgroundStudies using local samples suggest that racial minorities anticipate a greater preference for life-sustaining treatment when faced with a terminal illness. These studies are limited by size, representation, and insufficient exploration of sociocultural covariables.ObjectiveTo explore racial and ethnic differences in concerns and preferences for medical treatment at the end of life in a national sample, adjusting for sociocultural covariables.DesignDual-language (English/Spanish), mixed-mode (telephone/mail) survey.ParticipantsA total of 2,847 of 4,610 eligible community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries age 65 or older on July 1, 2003 (62% response).MeasurementsDemographics, education, financial strain, health status, social networks, perceptions of health-care access, quality, and the effectiveness of mechanical ventilation (MV), and concerns and preferences for medical care in the event the respondent had a serious illness and less than 1 year to live.ResultsRespondents included 85% non-Hispanic whites, 4.6% Hispanics, 6.3% blacks, and 4.2% "other" race/ethnicity. More blacks (18%) and Hispanics (15%) than whites (8%) want to die in the hospital; more blacks (28%) and Hispanics (21.2%) than whites (15%) want life-prolonging drugs that make them feel worse all the time; fewer blacks (49%) and Hispanics (57%) than whites (74%) want potentially life-shortening palliative drugs, and more blacks (24%, 36%) and Hispanics (22%, 29%) than whites (13%, 21%) want MV for life extension of 1 week or 1 month, respectively. In multivariable analyses, sociodemographic variables, preference for specialists, and an overly optimistic belief in the effectiveness of MV explained some of the greater preferences for life-sustaining drugs and mechanical ventilation among non-whites. Black race remained an independent predictor of concern about receiving too much treatment [adjusted OR = 2.0 (1.5-2.7)], preference for dying in a hospital [AOR = 2.3 (1.6-3.2)], receiving life-prolonging drugs [1.9 (1.4-2.6)], MV for 1 week [2.3 (1.6-3.3)] or 1 month's [2.1 (1.6-2.9)] life extension, and a preference not to take potentially life-shortening palliative drugs [0.4 (0.3-0.5)]. Hispanic ethnicity remained an independent predictor of preference for dying in the hospital [2.2 (1.3-4.0)] and against potentially life-shortening palliative drugs [0.5 (0.3-0.7)].ConclusionsGreater preference for intensive treatment near the end of life among minority elders is not explained fully by confounding sociocultural variables. Still, most Medicare beneficiaries in all race/ethnic groups prefer not to die in the hospital, to receive life-prolonging drugs that make them feel worse all the time, or to receive MV.

Dataset Information

Evaluation of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Treatment and Mortality Among Women With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Importance

Objective

Design, setting, and participants

Exposures

Main outcomes and measures

Results

Conclusions and relevance

Publications

Evaluation of Racial/Ethnic Differences in Treatment and Mortality Among Women With Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets