Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Seetharaman S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8185640 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Dec
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Publications
Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder.
Seetharaman Sujatha S Fields Errol L EL
Pediatrics in review 20201201 12
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe adverse effects of COVID-19 and the associated restrictions on eating disorder populations have been discussed in recent literature. However, little is known about the presentation of cases with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) during this period.AimsTo explore the extent of the literature on the presentation of ARFID, and ARFID-like cases, during the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodCochrane Library, CINAHL (EBSCO), PsycINFO (EBSCO), EMBASE (Ovid) and Medline (Ovid) were searched for publications between March 2020 and May 2023. Google Scholar and reference lists were hand searched. At least two reviewers independently screened each paper. Narrative synthesis was used.ResultsSeven papers were included: four case reports and three cohort studies (total ARFID sample of 46). Included papers were assessed as having high (n = 3) or moderate (n = 4) quality. Findings did not suggest an increase in ARFID cases during the COVID-19 pandemic, although it is unclear if this is because of a lack of impact or underrecognition of ARFID. A need for a multidisciplinary approach to differentiate between ARFID and organic causes of ARFID-like presentations (e.g. gastrointestinal effects of COVID-19) was highlighted.ConclusionsPublications specifically pertaining to ARFID presentations during the COVID-19 pandemic have been few. Papers found have been of small sample sizes and lack subanalyses for ARFID within broader eating disorder samples. Continued surveillance is needed to evaluate any COVID-19-specific effects on the development, identification, treatment and outcomes of ARFID.
| S-EPMC10951850 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ImportanceThe neurobiology of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is poorly understood.ObjectiveTo evaluate whether individuals with ARFID exhibit disruptions in fear, appetite, and disgust brain regions compared with healthy control (HC) participants when shown images of food and objects.Design, setting, and participantsIn this case-control study conducted from July 2016 to January 2021, children, adolescents, and young adults completed structured interviews and a validated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) food cue paradigm. The study was conducted at a single academic medical center. Data analysis was conducted from April 2023 to August 2024.ExposuresPresence vs absence of ARFID and its phenotypes (ARFID-fear, ARFID-lack of interest in eating, ARFID-sensory sensitivity); pictures of food vs objects during fMRI food cue paradigm.Main outcomes and measuresBlood oxygenation level-dependent activation in regions of interest (ROIs; amygdala, hypothalamus, insula, anterior cingulate cortex [ACC]) and the whole brain.ResultsParticipants were 110 children, adolescents, and young adults with full or subthreshold ARFID (75 participants; mean [SD] age, 16.2 [3.8] years; 41 [55%] female) and age-matched HC participants (35 participants; mean [SD] age, 17.3 [4.0] years; 27 [69%] female) recruited for studies of the neurobiology of ARFID and restrictive eating disorders. Participants with ARFID demonstrated greater activation than HC participants of the ACC (mean difference, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.77]; P = .009), sensory association cortex (mean difference on left side, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.79]; P = .005; right side, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.28 to 0.76]; P = .02), and supplementary motor cortex (mean difference, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.47 to 1.15]; P = .04). The ARFID-fear group showed greater amygdala activation vs HC (mean difference, 0.49 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.82]; P = .04), and greater lack of interest was associated with lower hypothalamus activation in the ARFID-lack of interest group (r = -0.38 [95% CI, -0.69 to -0.11]; P = .03). The ARFID-sensory sensitivity group did not show greater insula activation vs HC but showed greater activation of the ACC (mean difference, 0.48 [95% CI, 0.22 to 0.74]; P = .005) and somatosensory cortex (mean difference on left side, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.33-0.87]; P = .001; right side, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.29 to 0.80]; P = .03).Conclusions and relevanceResults indicate generalized hyperactivation of ACC, sensory association cortex, and supplementary motor cortex in response to visual food stimuli in children, adolescents, and young adults with ARFID, suggesting a novel neurobiological circuit associated with this disorder. Activation appears consistent with ARFID phenotypic rationales for food avoidance, with hyperactivation of fear regions in ARFID-fear and hypoactivation of appetite regions with increasing ARFID-lack of interest severity.
| S-EPMC11836757 | biostudies-literature
Project description: Not available
| S-EPMC10962111 | biostudies-literature
Project description:There are currently no evidence-based treatments for adults with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the acceptability, feasibility, and proof-of-concept of cognitive-behavioral therapy for ARFID (CBT-AR) for adults. Males and females (ages 18-55 years) were offered 20-30 outpatient sessions of CBT-AR delivered by one of five therapists. Of 18 eligible adults offered CBT-AR, 15 chose to participate and 14 completed treatment. All patients endorsed high ratings of treatment credibility and expected improvement after the first session, and 93% of completers provided high ratings of satisfaction at the conclusion of treatment. Therapists rated the majority (80%) of patients as "much improved" or "very much improved." Based on intent-to-treat analyses, ARFID severity on the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview (PARDI) showed a large and significant decrease from pre- to post-treatment; and patients incorporated a mean of 18.0 novel foods. The underweight subgroup (n = 4) gained an average of 11.38 pounds, showing a large and significant increase in mean BMI from the underweight to the normal-weight range. At post-treatment, 47% of patients no longer met criteria for ARFID. To our knowledge, this is the first prospective treatment study of ARFID in adults. The findings of this study provide preliminary evidence of feasibility, acceptability, and proof-of-concept of CBT-AR for heterogeneous presentations of ARFID in adults. Randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02963220.
| S-EPMC8375627 | biostudies-literature
Project description:There is a dearth of published research evaluating behavior-analytic assessment and treatment of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) given the recent revisions in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition. In this study, therapists conducted periodic food preference assessments to help guide treatment for a typically developing child with ARFID and food selectivity. Further, therapists evaluated a treatment package including demand fading, escape prevention, and self-monitoring to increase food variety. Consumption increased during treatment with target foods; however, preference shifts were minor when compared to the pretreatment food preference assessment. Variety continued to increase overtime using the same treatment package and treatment effects were generalized to family meals and other locations.Supplementary informationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40617-023-00821-0.
| S-EPMC10890989 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background and aimsThe objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) in patients with celiac disease (CD) and assess metabolic complications, disease control, diet adherence, and correlation with symptom and quality-of-life metrics.MethodsThis was a retrospective study of 137 adult patients with CD who completed an ARFID survey in the CD clinic between 2018 and 2020. Demographics, clinical results, standardized diet assessment, and results of Celiac Disease Symptom Diary and Impact of a Gluten-free Diet Questionnaire were reviewed. The primary outcome measured was the rate of suspected ARFID based on patient-reported survey responses.ResultsSeventy-eight patients (57%) met suspected ARFID criteria. There were no differences in age, gender, body mass index, micronutrient deficiencies, or bone disease in those with or without ARFID. Patients with ARFID did not have a difference in biopsy activity or better adherence to a gluten-free diet compared with non-ARFID patients. Food and social burden on Impact of a Gluten-free Diet Questionnaire was most predictive of ARFID.ConclusionARFID is common and has a high impact in patients with CD. Although some eating behavior is certainly due to their CD, there was no distinct difference in disease control between those with or without suspected ARFID, suggesting these maladaptive behaviors are not necessary for disease control. We did not find increased metabolic complications, but this was a 2-year snapshot. We need to further understand the social and food impacts on patients who score high on this survey to prevent further deficiencies and impaired, long-term detrimental eating behaviors.
| S-EPMC11307965 | biostudies-literature
Project description:ObjectiveAvoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) is a relatively new feeding and eating disorder category in DSM-5 characterized by extreme food avoidance/restriction. Much is unknown about ARFID, with limited understanding of its prevalence and comorbidities in general pediatric populations. This study aimed to classify ARFID prevalence and characteristics in children within the Generation R Study, a population-based Dutch cohort (N = 2,862).MethodARFID was assessed via an Index that comprised parent-reported questionnaires and researcher-assessed measures of picky eating, energy intake, diet quality, growth, and psychosocial impact, all in the absence of body/weight dissatisfaction to align with DSM-5 criteria. Parents also reported on child appetitive traits and emotional/behavioral problems (eg, anxiety, depression, attention problems).ResultsUsing DSM-5-based categorization, 183 (6.4%) of 2,862 children were classified as presenting with ARFID symptoms. Compared with children not exhibiting symptoms, children classified with ARFID symptomatology expressed other avoidant eating behavior, including decreased enjoyment of food (d = -1.06, false discovery rate-corrected p [p FDR] < .001), increased satiety responsiveness (d = 1.06, p FDR < .001), and emotional undereating (d = 0.21, p FDR < .01), as well as more emotional problems, including withdrawn/depressed (d = 0.38, p FDR < .001), social problems (d = 0.34, p FDR < 0.001), attention problems (d = 0.38, p FDR < .001), anxiety (d = 0.30, p FDR < .001), obsessive/compulsive problems (d = 0.15, p FDR < .05), and autistic traits (d = 0.22; p FDR < .05). Associations did not differ by sex.ConclusionThis is the first large-scale community-based study to characterize ARFID and to demonstrate that ARFID symptom classification is common in children aged ≤10 years. Findings suggest that appetitive, emotional, and behavioral comorbidities may underlie or reinforce the presentation of ARFID.Diversity & inclusion statementWe worked to ensure sex and gender balance in the recruitment of human participants. We worked to ensure race, ethnic, and/or other types of diversity in the recruitment of human participants. Diverse cell lines and/or genomic datasets were not available. While citing references scientifically relevant for this work, we also actively worked to promote inclusion of historically underrepresented racial and/or ethnic groups in science in our reference list. The author list of this paper includes contributors from the location and/or community where the research was conducted who participated in the data collection, design, analysis, and/or interpretation of the work. We actively worked to promote sex and gender balance in our author group. One or more of the authors of this paper self-identifies as a member of one or more historically underrepresented sexual and/or gender groups in science.
| S-EPMC11562555 | biostudies-literature
Project description:AbstractRecent reports document avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) symptoms among 13-40% of adults presenting to neurogastroenterology clinics, but ARFID in pediatrics is understudied. We conducted a retrospective review of charts from 129 consecutive referrals (ages 6-18 years; 57% female) for pediatric neurogastroenterology examination, from January 2016 through December 2018. Eleven cases (8%) met the full criteria for ARFID by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition and 19 cases (15%) had clinically significant avoidant/ restrictive eating behaviors with insufficient information for a definitive ARFID diagnosis. Of patients with ARFID symptoms (n = 30), 20 (67%) cited fear of gastrointestinal symptoms as motivation for their avoidant/ restrictive eating. Compared to patients without ARFID symptoms, patients with ARFID symptoms were older (P < .001), more likely to be female (51% vs 79%, P = 0.014), and more frequently presented with eating/weight-related complaints (15% vs 33%, P = 0.026). This pilot retrospective study showed ARFID symptoms present in 23% of pediatric neurogastroenterology patients; further research is needed to understand risk and maintenance factors of ARFID in the neurogastroenterology setting.
| S-EPMC10126824 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundPrevious research has demonstrated that early weight gain in family-based treatment (FBT) is predictive of remission for adolescents with anorexia nervosa (AN). However, no published data has addressed if early weight gain is also predictive of reaching weight restoration (i.e., 95% EBW) in patients with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID). Furthermore, no studies have evaluated the performance of the statistical models used to predict weight restoration at the end of treatment. This study sought to examine whether early weight gain in ARFID is predictive of weight restoration at 20 weeks using ROC analysis. Additionally, this study assessed how accurately the model classified patients and what types of misclassifications occurred.MethodsParticipants (n = 130, 57.7% cisgender female 70.0% white) received virtual outpatient FBT. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used to predict successful weight restoration at end of treatment, using early weight gain as the predictor. Twenty weeks was considered as the end of treatment, to align with the definition of end of treatment in FBT clinical trials. ROC analyses demonstrated that gaining at least 6.2 pounds by week 5 of treatment was the strongest predictor of achieving 95% EBW at 20 weeks (AUC = 0.72 [0.63, 0.81]). ROC analyses misclassified 35% of patients; the most common misclassification was predicting that a patient would not achieve 95% EBW when they actually did (61.6%). A logistical regression model, which included the patients' %EBW at admission in addition to early weight gain as a predictor, outperformed the ROC analyses (AUC = 0.90 [0.85, 0.95]) and provided additional context by showing the probability that a patient would succeed.ConclusionTaken together, research demonstrates that early weight gain is a useful predictor of 95% EBW at 20 weeks of treatment for patients with ARFID who require weight restoration. Furthermore, results suggest that statistical models need to take into account additional information, such as %EBW at admission, along with early weight gain in order to more accurately predict which patients will reach weight restoration at week 20.
| S-EPMC10870495 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Most individuals with avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder (ARFID) never receive treatment, and treatment needs far exceed the current capacity of mental health services. Occupational therapy (OT) focuses on enhancing function in daily activities, including eating and feeding. Given OT's rich history in mental health and pediatric feeding disorder treatment, we spotlight the potential role of OT in ARFID treatment, current knowledge, and opportunities for future research. Through a preliminary exploratory inquiry involving a review of current literature and clinical practice, we investigated OT's current involvement, knowledge, and interprofessional collaborative practice gaps in ARFID treatment. While many occupational therapy practitioners (OTPs) engage in ARFID treatment, interventions lack rigorous evaluation, and there is limited evidence defining OT's distinct role in interprofessional ARFID treatment. OTPs are uniquely positioned to provide interventions for individuals with ARFID across the lifespan, though research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of OT interventions. Future research suggestions include standardizing OT approaches to ARFID treatment and conducting single-case experiments and randomized controlled trials to compare OT approaches with alternative methods. Recommendations to address practice gaps include enhancing ARFID education for OT students and practitioners and fostering a greater understanding of OT's role on the interprofessional team. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Individuals with ARFID face barriers to eating that impact their health and function. On a multidisciplinary team, OTPs can treat diverse client populations by identifying and addressing barriers to daily participation, such as physical impairments, trauma history, and environmental barriers. More research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of OT practices in ARFID treatment.
| S-EPMC11401961 | biostudies-literature