Dataset Information

Average volume-assured pressure support vs conventional bilevel pressure support in pediatric nocturnal hypoventilation: a case series.

ABSTRACT:

Study objectives

Average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) is a modality of noninvasive ventilation that provides a targeted tidal volume by automatically adjusting the inspiratory pressure support within a set range. Pediatric studies evaluating the efficacy of AVAPS in treating nocturnal hypoventilation are confined to case reports. The aim of this study was to compare AVAPS to conventional bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) support in improving hypercarbia in a cohort of pediatric patients with nocturnal hypoventilation.

Methods

Retrospective review of patient records at an established tertiary pediatric sleep laboratory over a 6-year period. Ventilatory and sleep study parameters from AVAPS and conventional BPAP titration studies were compared. AVAPS was used only if hypoventilation was not controlled using conventional BPAP. Inspiratory pressures, tidal volumes, and adherence were downloaded on final titrated ventilatory settings. Comparisons were made using paired t test.

Results

A total of 19 patients (11 boys, 8 girls; median age 10.5 years, range 1 to 20 years) were identified. Diagnoses included neuromuscular disease (n = 9), obstructive hypoventilation (n = 5), parenchymal lung disease (n = 4), and congenital central hypoventilation syndrome (n = 2). AVAPS demonstrated significant improvement in peak (P = .009) and mean (P = .001). Transcutaneous CO₂ parameters compared to conventional bilevel. Oxygenation on AVAPS showed positive trend but did not reach statistical significance. AVAPS delivered higher tidal volumes (P = .04) using similar pressures. There was no statistically significant difference in obstructive apnea-hypopnea index, respiratory arousal index, sleep efficiency, and adherence between AVAPS and conventional BPAP.

Conclusions

AVAPS was an effective alternative to conventional BPAP in improving hypercarbia in our selective cohort of pediatric patients. Prospective, longitudinal studies are needed to evaluate the benefits of AVAPS feature in the pediatric population.

SUBMITTER: Saddi V

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8320487 | biostudies-literature | 2021 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Average volume-assured pressure support vs conventional bilevel pressure support in pediatric nocturnal hypoventilation: a case series.

Saddi Vishal V Thambipillay Ganesh G Pithers Sonia S Moody Miles M Martin Bradley B Blecher Gregory G Teng Arthur A

Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine 20210501 5

<h4>Study objectives</h4>Average volume-assured pressure support (AVAPS) is a modality of noninvasive ventilation that provides a targeted tidal volume by automatically adjusting the inspiratory pressure support within a set range. Pediatric studies evaluating the efficacy of AVAPS in treating nocturnal hypoventilation are confined to case reports. The aim of this study was to compare AVAPS to conventional bilevel positive airway pressure (BPAP) support in improving hypercarbia in a cohort of pe ...[more]

PMID: 33393900

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionWe were able to treat a patient with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who also suffered from sleep-disordered breathing by using the average volume-assured pressure support mode of a Respironics V60 Ventilator (Philips Respironics: United States). This allows a target tidal volume to be set based on automatic changes in inspiratory positive airway pressure. This removed the need to change the noninvasive positive pressure ventilation settings during the day and during sleep. The Respironics V60 Ventilator, in the average volume-assured pressure support mode, was attached to our patient and improved and stabilized his sleep-related hypoventilation by automatically adjusting force to within an acceptable range.Case presentationOur patient was a 74-year-old Japanese man who was hospitalized for treatment due to worsening of dyspnea and hypoxemia. He was diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and full-time biphasic positive airway pressure support ventilation was initiated. Our patient was temporarily provided with portable noninvasive positive pressure ventilation at night-time following an improvement in his condition, but his chronic obstructive pulmonary disease again worsened due to the recurrence of a respiratory infection. During the initial exacerbation, his tidal volume was significantly lower during sleep (378.9 ± 72.9mL) than while awake (446.5 ± 63.3mL). A ventilator that allows ventilation to be maintained by automatically adjusting the inspiratory force to within an acceptable range was attached in average volume-assured pressure support mode, improving his sleep-related hypoventilation, which is often associated with the use of the Respironics V60 Ventilator. Polysomnography performed while our patient was on noninvasive positive pressure ventilation revealed obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (apnea-hypopnea index = 14), suggesting that his chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was complicated by obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.ConclusionIn cases such as this, in which patients with severe acute respiratory failure requiring full-time noninvasive positive pressure ventilation therapy also show sleep-disordered breathing, different ventilator settings must be used for waking and sleeping. On such occasions, the Respironics V60 Ventilator, which is equipped with an average volume-assured pressure support mode, may be useful in improving gas exchange and may achieve good patient compliance, because that mode allows ventilation to be maintained by automatically adjusting the inspiratory force to within an acceptable range whenever ventilation falls below target levels.

Dataset Information

Average volume-assured pressure support vs conventional bilevel pressure support in pediatric nocturnal hypoventilation: a case series.

Study objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Average volume-assured pressure support vs conventional bilevel pressure support in pediatric nocturnal hypoventilation: a case series.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets