Dataset Information

Phase I/II trial of concurrent extracranial palliative radiation therapy with Dabrafenib and Trametinib in metastatic BRAF V600E/K mutation-positive cutaneous Melanoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Concurrent treatment with BRAF inhibitors and palliative radiation therapy (RT) could be associated with increased toxicity, especially skin toxicity. Current Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) consensus guideline recommend ceasing BRAF inhibitors during RT. There is a lack of data regarding concurrent RT with combined BRAF and MEK inhibitors. This single-arm phase I/II trial was designed to assess the safety and tolerability of palliative RT with concurrent Dabrafenib and Trametinib in patients with BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma.

Materials and methods

Patients received Dabrafenib and Trametinib before and during palliative RT to soft tissue, nodal or bony metastases. The RT dose was escalated stepwise during the study period. Toxicity data including clinical photographs of the irradiated area was collected for up to 12 months following completion of RT.

Results

Between June 2016 to October 2019, ten patients were enrolled before the study was stopped early due to low accrual rate. Six patients were treated at level 1 (20 Gy in 5 fractions, any location) and 4 patients at level 2a (30 Gy in 10 fractions with no abdominal viscera exposed). All alive patients completed one year of post-RT follow-up. Of the 82 adverse events (AEs) documented, the majority (90%) were grade 1 and 2. Eight grade 3 events (10%) occurred in five patients, only one was treatment-related (grade 3 fever due to Dabrafenib and Trametinib). No patients experienced grade 3 or 4 RT related toxicities, including skin toxicities. One serious AE was documented in relation to a grade 3 fever due to Dabrafenib and Trametinib requiring hospitalisation.

Conclusions

The lack of grade 3 and 4 RT-related toxicities in our study suggests that Dabrafenib and Trametinib may be continued concurrently during fractionated non-visceral palliative RT to extracranial sites.

SUBMITTER: Wang W

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8379352 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Previous analysis of COMBI-d (NCT01584648) demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with combination dabrafenib and trametinib versus dabrafenib monotherapy in BRAF V600E/K-mutant metastatic melanoma. This study was continued to assess 3-year landmark efficacy and safety after??36-month follow-up for all living patients. Patients and methods:This double-blind, phase 3 study enrolled previously untreated patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma. Patients were randomized to receive dabrafenib (150?mg twice daily) plus trametinib (2?mg once daily) or dabrafenib plus placebo. The primary endpoint was PFS; secondary endpoints were OS, overall response, duration of response, safety, and pharmacokinetics. Results:Between 4 May and 30 November 2012, a total of 423 of 947 screened patients were randomly assigned to receive dabrafenib plus trametinib (n?=?211) or dabrafenib monotherapy (n?=?212). At data cut-off (15 February 2016), outcomes remained superior with the combination: 3-year PFS was 22% with dabrafenib plus trametinib versus 12% with monotherapy, and 3-year OS was 44% versus 32%, respectively. Twenty-five patients receiving monotherapy crossed over to combination therapy, with continued follow-up under the monotherapy arm (per intent-to-treat principle). Of combination-arm patients alive at 3 years, 58% remained on dabrafenib plus trametinib. Three-year OS with the combination reached 62% in the most favourable subgroup (normal lactate dehydrogenase and?<3 organ sites with metastasis) versus only 25% in the unfavourable subgroup (elevated lactate dehydrogenase). The dabrafenib plus trametinib safety profile was consistent with previous clinical trial observations, and no new safety signals were detected with long-term use. Conclusions:These data demonstrate that durable (?3 years) survival is achievable with dabrafenib plus trametinib in patients with BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma and support long-term first-line use of the combination in this setting.

Project description:Radioactive iodine-refractory metastatic differentiated thyroid cancer (RAIR) is associated with a poor prognosis. Multikinase inhibitors have demonstrated improvement in progression-free but not overall survival in such patients, but usage is limited by significant adverse effects and the development of resistance. Clinical research has demonstrated improvement in progression-free survival with the combined use of the BRAF/MEK inhibitor in patients with metastatic melanoma and anaplastic thyroid cancer with the BRAFV600E mutation and has shown promise in redifferentiation of BRAF-positive RAIR differentiated thyroid cancer. A 58-year-old woman went to her primary care physician for a growing mass on the left side of her neck. CT imaging noted a 6 x 8 x 6 cm mixed cystic and solid mass and lymphadenopathy. Core biopsy subsequently showed metastatic papillary thyroid cancer (Stage III, PT4a/PN1b), and she underwent a total thyroidectomy with left neck dissection. She then received 204mCi 131I post-total thyroidectomy. Unfortunately, her thyroglobulin continued to increase post-radioactive iodine (RAI) treatment, indicating persistent and/or recurrent thyroid cancer. An RAI-131 whole-body scan on the thyrogen protocol showed no significant RAI uptake. A fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET) CT scan was then performed, which showed recurrent metastatic disease with hypermetabolism noted in the left thyroid bed and FDG-avid bilateral cervical lymph nodes and pulmonary nodules. Given these findings, her cancer was classified as radioactive iodine refractory (RAIR). Molecular testing indicated the BRAFV600E mutation. After a discussion with the patient, it was decided to initiate therapy with a BRAF inhibitor (dabrafenib 150 mg twice a day) and MEK inhibitor (trametinib 2 mg once a day) in an attempt to redifferentiate RAIR. Repeat RAI-131 thyrogen whole body scan one month after initiation of therapy demonstrated left level 2 cervical lymphadenopathy radioiodine uptake. The patient subsequently received 216 mCi 131I treatment given evidence of redifferentiation. Her post-treatment scan indicated additional uptake in a left lower lobe pulmonary nodule as well as a left paratracheal mass indicating successful RAI-131 uptake by metastases. Her thyroglobulin level, six months post-RAI, decreased to 4.0 indicating an encouraging response. Further surveillance, including imaging studies, is planned. This case illustrates the re-differential potential for dabrafenib and trametinib treatment in patients with BRAFV600E-mutated RAIR differentiated thyroid cancer. This therapy has been shown to be successful in small series of patients and could potentially be offered to RAIR patients with the BRAFV600E mutation as an alternative to multikinase treatment given its favorable side-effect profile.