Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A study on the therapeutic effects of biplane skin dilator implantation in auricular reconstruction.


ABSTRACT: This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of biplane skin dilator implantation with those of conventional skin dilator implantation in auricular reconstruction. A total of 137 patients with microtia who met the inclusion criteria from January 2020 to April 2021 were retrospectively selected. Sixty-three patients comprised the control group and were implanted with a skin expander using the conventional method. Seventy-four patients comprised the experimental group and were implanted with a skin expander using the biplane method. Non-parametric tests were used to compare the down-moving distance of the skin dilator between the experimental group and the control group. There was a statistically significant difference in the down-moving distance of the skin dilator between the experimental group and the control group (P < 0.05). The chi-square test showed no significant difference in postoperative complications between the experimental group and the control group (P > 0.05). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the satisfaction rate of patients and their families between the experimental group and the control group (P > 0.05). In this study, the treatment effect of biplane skin dilator implantation was better than that of conventional skin dilator implantation.

SUBMITTER: Sun P 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8519932 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A study on the therapeutic effects of biplane skin dilator implantation in auricular reconstruction.

Sun Pengfei P   Lu Meng M   Wang Changchen C   Pan Bo B  

Scientific reports 20211015 1


This study aimed to compare the therapeutic effects of biplane skin dilator implantation with those of conventional skin dilator implantation in auricular reconstruction. A total of 137 patients with microtia who met the inclusion criteria from January 2020 to April 2021 were retrospectively selected. Sixty-three patients comprised the control group and were implanted with a skin expander using the conventional method. Seventy-four patients comprised the experimental group and were implanted wit  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC9240525 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3312155 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC5395887 | biostudies-literature
2014-02-07 | E-GEOD-38308 | biostudies-arrayexpress
| S-EPMC8184466 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8280009 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10814984 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9098147 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6200177 | biostudies-literature
2014-02-07 | GSE38308 | GEO