Dataset Information

Defective satellite DNA clustering into chromocenters underlies hybrid incompatibility in Drosophila.

ABSTRACT: Although rapid evolution of pericentromeric satellite DNA repeats is theorized to promote hybrid incompatibility (HI) (Yunis and Yasmineh 1971; Henikoff et al. 2001; Ferree and Barbash 2009; Sawamura 2012; Jagannathan and Yamashita 2017), how divergent repeats affect hybrid cells remains poorly understood. Recently, we demonstrated that sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins cluster satellite DNA from multiple chromosomes into 'chromocenters', thereby bundling chromosomes to maintain the entire genome in a single nucleus (Jagannathan et al. 2018; Jagannathan et al. 2019). Here we show that ineffective clustering of divergent satellite DNA in the cells of Drosophila hybrids results in chromocenter disruption, associated micronuclei formation and tissue atrophy. We further demonstrate that previously identified HI factors trigger chromocenter disruption and micronuclei in hybrids, linking their function to a conserved cellular process. Together, we propose a unifying framework that explains how the widely observed satellite DNA divergence between closely related species can cause reproductive isolation.

SUBMITTER: Jagannathan M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8557456 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Defective Satellite DNA Clustering into Chromocenters Underlies Hybrid Incompatibility in Drosophila.

Jagannathan Madhav M Yamashita Yukiko M YM

Molecular biology and evolution 20211001 11

Although rapid evolution of pericentromeric satellite DNA repeats is theorized to promote hybrid incompatibility (HI) (Yunis and Yasmineh 1971; Henikoff et al. 2001; Ferree and Barbash 2009; Sawamura 2012; Jagannathan and Yamashita 2017), how divergent repeats affect hybrid cells remains poorly understood. Recently, we demonstrated that sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins cluster satellite DNA from multiple chromosomes into "chromocenters," thereby bundling chromosomes to maintain the entire ...[more]

PMID: 34302471

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundChromocenters are defined as a punctate condensed blocks of chromatin in the interphase cell nuclei of certain cell types with unknown biological significance. In recent years a progress in revealing of chromocenters protein content has been made although the details of DNA content within constitutive heterochromatin still remain unclear. It is known that these regions are enriched in tandem repeats (TR) and transposable elements. Quick improvement of genome sequencing does not help to assemble the heterochromatic regions due to lack of appropriate bioinformatics techniques.ResultsChromocenters DNA have been isolated by a biochemical approach from mouse liver cells nuclei and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq resulting in ChrmC dataset. Analysis of ChrmC dataset by the bioinformatics tools available revealed that the major component of chromocenter DNA are TRs: ~ 66% MaSat and ~ 4% MiSat. Other previously classified TR families constitute ~ 1% of ChrmC dataset. About 6% of chromocenters DNA are mostly unannotated sequences. In the contigs assembled with IDBA_UD there are many fragments of heterochromatic Y-chromosome, rDNA and other pseudo-genes and non-coding DNA. A protein coding sfi1 homolog gene fragment was also found in contigs. The Sfi1 homolog gene is located on the chromosome 11 in the reference genome very close to the Golden Pass Gap (a ~ 3 Mb empty region reserved to the pericentromeric region) and proves the purity of chromocenters isolation. The second major fraction are non-LTR retroposons (SINE and LINE) with overwhelming majority of LINE - ~ 11% of ChrmC. Most of the LINE fragments are from the ~ 2 kb region at the end of the 2nd ORF and its' flanking region. The precise LINEs' segment of ~ 2 kb is the necessary mouse constitutive heterohromatin component together with TR. The third most abundant fraction are ERVs. The ERV distribution in chromocenters differs from the whole genome: IAP (ERV2 class) is the most numerous in ChrmC while MaLR (ERV3 class) prevails in the reference genome. IAP and its LTR also prevail in TR containing contigs extracted from the WGS dataset. In silico prediction of IAP and LINE fragments in chromocenters was confirmed by direct fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).ConclusionOur data of chromocenters' DNA (ChrmC) sequencing demonstrate that IAP with LTR and a precise ~ 2 kb fragment of LINE represent a substantial fraction of mouse chromocenters (constitutive heteroсhromatin) along with TRs.

Dataset Information

Defective satellite DNA clustering into chromocenters underlies hybrid incompatibility in Drosophila.

Publications

Defective Satellite DNA Clustering into Chromocenters Underlies Hybrid Incompatibility in Drosophila.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets