Unknown

Dataset Information

0

An optimisation of four SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR assays in a Kenyan laboratory to support the national COVID-19 rapid response teams.


ABSTRACT: Background: The global COVID-19 outbreak relies on a quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2), to facilitate the roll-out of patient care and infection control measures. There are several qRT-PCR assays with little evidence on their comparability. We report alterations to the developers' recommendations to sustain the testing capability in our setting, where the supply of testing reagents is limited. Methods: Standards generated from a serially-diluted positive control and previously identified positive/negative samples were used to determine the optimal volumes of the qRT-PCR reagents and to evaluate the validity and performance of four assays: Charité Berlin and European Virus Archive - GLOBAL (EVAg) primer-probe sets, and DAAN and Beijing Genomics Institute (BGI) premixed commercial kits. A multiplex and singleplex RT-PCR kit was used with the two primer-probe sets and the recommended assay volumes of the two premixed kits were altered. Results: In comparison to the multiplex RT-PCR kit, the singleplex RT-PCR kit combined with the primer-probe sets yielded consistent cycle threshold (Ct) values across the different titrations tested. The DAAN premixed kit produced comparable Ct values across the titrations, while the BGI kit showed incomparable Ct values and inconsistent results between batches using the manufacturer's recommended volumes. Conclusion: We achieved a 2.5-fold and 4-fold increase in the number of tests/kit for the premixed kits and the primer-probe sets, respectively. The primer-probe set assays were reliable and consistent, and we preferred a combination of an EVAg and a Berlin target. Any inconclusive result was repeated by different individuals following the same protocol. DAAN was a consistent and reliable assay even at lower concentrations from the stated recommendations. BGI in contrast, required dilution to improve its performance and was hence an assay that was used in combination with EVAg or Berlin targets.

SUBMITTER: Mohammed KS 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8921690 | biostudies-literature | 2020

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

An optimization of four SARS-CoV-2 qRT-PCR assays in a Kenyan laboratory to support the national COVID-19 rapid response teams.

Mohammed Khadija Said KS   de Laurent Zaydah R ZR   Omuoyo Donwilliams O DO   Lewa Clement C   Gicheru Elijah E   Cheruiyot Robinson R   Bartilol Brian B   Mutua Shadrack S   Musyoki Jennifer J   Gumba Horace H   Mwacharo Jedidah J   Riako Debra D   Mwangi Shaban J SJ   Gichuki Bonface M BM   Nyamako Lydia L   Karani Angela A   Karanja Henry H   Mugo Daisy D   Gitonga John N JN   Njuguna Susan S   Gumbi Wilson W   Tawa Brian B   Tendwa Metrine M   Cheruiyot Wesley W   Sein Yiakon Y   Nyambu John K JK   Patta Shem O SO   Thani Thani Suleiman TS   Maitha Eric K EK   Kitole Benson B   Mwakinangu Mohamed S MS   Muslih Barke S BS   Otieno John Ochieng JO   Nyiro Joyce U JU   Kiyuka Patience P   Ndwiga Leonard L   Ndwiga Leonard L   Wamae Kevin K   Kimani Domtila D   Makale Johnstone J   Morobe John Mwita JM   Osoti Victor V   Lambisia Arnold W AW   Odundo Calleb C   Mwarumba Salim S   Mutunga Martin M   Bejon Philip P   Tsofa Benjamin B   Agoti Charles N CN   Ochola-Oyier Lynette Isabella LI  

Wellcome open research 20200101


<b>Background:</b> The COVID-19 pandemic relies on real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for the detection of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), to facilitate roll-out of patient care and infection control measures. There are several qRT-PCR assays with little evidence on their comparability. We report alterations to the developers' recommendations to sustain the testing capability in a resource-limited setting. <b>Methods:</b> We used a SARS-CoV-2 positive con  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC1867570 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9695440 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9134141 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4615770 | biostudies-literature
| PRJEB38355 | ENA
| S-EPMC5548846 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC3994070 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9610219 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4767985 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6718424 | biostudies-literature