Dataset Information

Prognostic utility of self-reported sarcopenia (SARC-F) in the Multiethnic Cohort.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Age-related loss in skeletal muscle mass, quality, and strength, known as sarcopenia, is a well-known phenomenon of aging and is determined clinically using methods such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, these clinical methods to measure sarcopenia are not practical for population-based studies, and a five-question screening tool known as SARC-F has been validated to screen for sarcopenia.

Methods

We investigated the relationship between appendicular skeletal lean mass/height² (ALM/HT² ) (kg/m² ) assessed by DXA and SARC-F in a subset of 1538 (778 men and 760 women) participants in the Multiethnic Cohort (MEC) Study after adjustment for race/ethnicity, age, and body mass index (BMI) at the time of DXA measurement. We then investigated the association between SARC-F and mortality among 71 283 (41 757 women and 29 526 men) participants in the MEC, who responded to the five SARC-F questions on a mailed questionnaire as part of the MEC follow-up in 2012-2016.

Results

In women, SARC-F score was significantly inversely associated with ALM/HT² after adjusting for race/ethnicity, and age and BMI at DXA (r = -0.167, P < 0.001); the result was similar in men although it did not reach statistical significance (r = -0.056, P = 0.12). Among the 71 000+ MEC participants, SARC-F score ≥ 4, as an indicator of sarcopenia, was higher in women (20.9%) than in men (11.2%) (P < 0.0001) and increased steadily with increasing age (6.3% in <70 vs. 41.3% in 90+ years old) (P < 0.0001). SARC-F score ≥ 4 was highest among Latinos (30.8% in women and 16.1% in men) and lowest in Native Hawaiian women (15.6%) and Japanese American men (8.9%). During an average of 6.8 years of follow-up, compared with men with SARC-F score of 0-1 (indicator of no sarcopenia), men with SARC-F 2-3 (indicator of pre-sarcopenia) and SARC-F ≥ 4 had significantly increased risk of all-cause mortality [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.00, 1.77, 3.73, P < 0.001], cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality (HR = 1.00, 1.85, 3.98, P < 0.001), and cancer mortality (HR = 1.00, 1.46, 1.96, P < 0.001) after covariate adjustment. Comparable risk association patterns with SARC-F scores were observed in women (all-cause mortality: HR = 1.00, 1.47, 3.10, P < 0.001; CVD mortality: HR = 1.00, 1.59, 3.54, P < 0.001; cancer mortality: HR = 1.00, 1.30, 1.77, P < 0.001). These significant risk patterns between SARC-F and all-cause mortality were found across all sex-race/ethnic groups considered (12 in total).

Conclusions

An indicator of sarcopenia, determined using SARC-F, showed internal validity against DXA and displayed racial/ethnic and sex differences in distribution. SARC-F was associated with all-cause mortality as well as cause-specific mortality.

SUBMITTER: Wu AH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8977971 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic utility of self-reported sarcopenia (SARC-F) in the Multiethnic Cohort.

Wu Anna H AH Setiawan V Wendy VW Lim Unhee U Tseng Chiu-Cheng CC White Kami K KK Shepherd John J Lenz Heinz Josef HJ Cheng Iona I Stram Daniel O DO Haiman Christopher C Wilkens Lynne R LR Le Marchand Loïc L

Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle 20220130 2

<h4>Background</h4>Age-related loss in skeletal muscle mass, quality, and strength, known as sarcopenia, is a well-known phenomenon of aging and is determined clinically using methods such as dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, these clinical methods to measure sarcopenia are not practical for population-based studies, and a five-question screening tool known as SARC-F has been validated to screen for sarcopenia.<h4>Methods</h4>We investigated the relationship between appendicular s ...[more]

PMID: 35098697

Similar Datasets

Project description:Little is known about the prognostic value of the strength, assistance walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, and falls questionnaire (SARC-F) and SARC-F combined with calf circumference (SARC-CalF) among elderly nursing home residents.To compare the prognostic value of SARC-F and SARC-CalF for mortality in this population.We conducted a prospective study in four nursing homes in western China. Sarcopenia was estimated using SARC-F and SARC-CalF, respectively. Nutrition status, activities of daily living, and other covariates were evaluated. The survival status was collected via medical records and telephone interviews at the 12th month after the baseline investigation. We used multivariate Cox proportional-hazard models to calculate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1-year all-cause mortality by SARC-F-defined sarcopenia and SARC-CalF-defined sarcopenia, separately.We included 329 participants (median age: 85 years). The prevalences of SARC-F-defined sarcopenia and SARC-CalF-defined sarcopenia were 39.8% and 46.8%, respectively. During the 1-year follow-up period, 73 participants (22.7%) died. The mortality was 29.0% and 18.3% in the participants with or without SARC-F-defined sarcopenia, respectively (P = .025). The mortality was 26.6% and 19.0% in the participants with or without SARC-CalF-defined sarcopenia, respectively (P = .105). After adjusted for the relevant confounders including malnutrition, SARC-F-defined sarcopenia was independently associated with an increased risk of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 2.08; 95% CI: 1.27-3.42). However, SARC-CalF-defined sarcopenia was not an independent predictor of 1-year mortality (adjusted HR: 1.54; 95% CI: 0.95-2.47).Sarcopenia is highly prevalent in Chinese elderly nursing home residents according to SARC-F or SARC-CalF. SARC-F-defined sarcopenia appears to be better for predicting the 1-year mortality of Chinese nursing home residents than SARC-CalF-defined sarcopenia.

Project description:BackgroundThe strength, assistance walking, rise from a chair, climb stairs, and falls (SARC-F) questionnaire is a well-established instrument for screening of sarcopenia and sarcopenia-related functional impairments. As it is based on self-reporting, its use precludes patients who are unable to answer the questionnaire as a consequence of severe acute diseases or cognitive impairment. Therefore, we aimed to validate a proxy-reported version of the SARC-F for both ad-hoc as well as retrospective screening for severe sarcopenia-related functional impairments.MethodsPatients aged ≥60 years completed the SARC-F and performed the short physical performance battery (SPPB) at baseline (T1). Proxies in Cohort A gave a simultaneous assessment of the patients' functional status with the proxy-reported SARC-F at T1 and again, retrospectively, after 3 months (T2). Proxies in Cohort B only completed the SARC-F retrospectively at T2. The questionnaires' performances were assessed through sensitivity/specificity analyses and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. For non-inferiority analyses, results of both the patient-reported and proxy-reported SARC-F were correlated with the SPPB total score as well as the results of the chair-rise test subcategory; the respective correlation coefficients were tested against each other.ResultsOne hundred and four patients and 135 proxies participated. Using a SPPB score < 9 points as the reference standard, the proxy-reported SARC-F identified patients at high risk for sarcopenia-related functional impairment with a sensitivity of 0.81 (ad-hoc), 0.88 (retrospective Cohort A), and 0.87 (retrospective Cohort B) as well as a specificity of 0.89 (ad-hoc), 0.78 (retrospective Cohort A), and 0.64 (retrospective Cohort B). Areas under the ROC curves were ≥ 0.9 for the ad-hoc proxy-reported SARC-F and the retrospective proxy-reported SARC-F in both cohorts. The proxy-reported SARC-F showed a non-inferior correlation with the SPPB compared with the patient-reported SARC-F for ad-hoc (P = <0.001) as well as retrospective screening for severe sarcopenia-related functional impairment in both Cohorts A (P = 0.007) and B (P = 0.026).ConclusionsProxy-reported SARC-F is a valid instrument for both ad-hoc as well as retrospective screening for sarcopenia-related functional impairment and could become the standard tool for evaluating this risk in older adults with severe acute disease, for example, in patients with quickly evolving haematological conditions.

Project description:Sarcopenia is an increasingly recognized complication of cirrhosis that is associated with morbidity and mortality. Differences in the prevalence and prognosis of sarcopenia between men and women have been reported in other patient groups, but there is insufficient understanding of how sex impacts the prognostic value of sarcopenia in cirrhosis. A search of MEDLINE and Embase was conducted from earliest entries to April 2021. Studies were included if they examined sex-stratified mortality impact of reduced muscle function or mass in outpatient populations with cirrhosis. We identified 700 studies of which 6 were deemed relevant for inclusion in this narrative review. Studies of interest were heterogeneous, precluding pooling of data and making interpretation of the literature challenging. Muscle mass was assessed in five studies (n = 2566, 1730 men, 836 women) and was reduced in 36-50% of men and 24-43% of women. All five studies found that reduced muscle mass determined by computed tomography, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and bioelectrical impedance analysis was associated with increased mortality in men. Of these, two studies identified a corresponding relationship in women; reduced muscle mass defined by computed tomography was associated with increased mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.82, P = 0.001], while increasing muscle mass by bioelectrical impedance analysis likewise conferred a survival benefit (HR 0.45, P = 0.0016). Only one study assessed the relationship of muscle function with sex-stratified mortality (n = 1405, 827 men, 578 women), concluding that reduced muscle function predicted mortality in both men and women (HR 1.65, P < 0.001 and HR 1.54, P < 0.001, respectively). Reduced muscle mass in cirrhosis is consistently associated with mortality in men, but lack of sex-stratification of mortality analyses limits the ability to make strong conclusions about the impact of sarcopenia specifically in women, with even fewer data available for analysing muscle function. Improved understanding of the sex-specific impacts of sarcopenia may help address patient deterioration and mortality while awaiting liver transplantation and allow for early intervention to mitigate mortality risk. Large, multicentre studies with adequate female participation and sex-stratified mortality analyses are warranted.

Project description:BackgroundThe prevalence of sarcopenia is high in older people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and is now considered a critical problem in the healthcare sector. However, the preferred screening tool for identifying sarcopenia remains unknown. Thus, the aim of this study was to ensure that the diagnostic values of the SARC-F (strength, assisting with walking, rising from a chair, climbing stairs, and falling) and SARC-CalF (SARC and calf circumference) scales were compared with five reference diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study. Patients diagnosed with diabetes were treated at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. Appendicular skeletal muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance were assessed using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, handgrip strength, and gait speed assessment. Five diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia (Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia, International Working Group on Sarcopenia, Foundation for the National Institutes of Health, Sarcopenia Project, Society on Sarcopenia Cachexia and Wasting Disorders, and European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People criteria) were utilized. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were performed on the SARC-CalF and SARC-F scales. The diagnostic precision of both instruments was determined using the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the ROC curves (AUC).ResultsThis study included 689 subjects (459 men and 230 women) with a mean age of 58.1 ± 13.2 years. In accordance with the five reference diagnostic parameters, the prevalence of sarcopenia was between 4.5 and 19.2%. In addition, the range of sensitivity of SARC-F and SARC-CalF ranged from 61.4 to 67.4 and 82.6 to 91.8%, respectively. Concurrently, the specificity ranged from 63.1 to 67.3 and 51.5 to 61.2%, respectively. Overall, AUC values for SARC-CalF were higher than those for SARC-F, regardless of the diagnostic standard, sex, or age.ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that SARC-CalF significantly enhances the sensitivity and overall diagnosis of SARC-F. SARC-CalF appears to be an optimal screening tool for sarcopenia in adults with T2DM.

Project description:BackgroundSarcopenia is associated with adverse outcomes among older adults with cancer; however, no easily applied sarcopenia measure exists for use in clinical practice. The use of SARC-F, a 5-item self-reported sarcopenia screening questionnaire, among older adults with cancer remains to be investigated.MethodsOlder adults (aged ≥60 years) with cancer enrolled in the University of Alabama Cancer and Aging Resilience Evaluation Registry were identified. Patients completed the SARC-F questionnaire (with scores ≥4 considered positive for sarcopenia). The authors assessed for differences in geriatric assessment domain impairments, health-related quality of life, and health care utilization between those with and without sarcopenia using multivariate regression, then assessed the association of sarcopenia with survival using Kaplan-Meier methods and a Cox regression model, adjusting for covariates.ResultsIn total, 256 older adults were identified. The median age was 69 years, 59% of participants were men, and 75% were White. The median SARC-F score was 2 (interquartile range, 0-4), and 33% of participants screened positive. Those with sarcopenia had higher odds of having multiple impairments, including impaired instrumental activities of daily living (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 18.1; 95% CI, 7.5-43.8) and frailty (aOR, 43.5; 95% CI, 17.7-106.8) as well as reduced physical and mental health-related quality of life (β coefficient, -13.6 and -11.5, respectively) and increased emergency room visits (aOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.3-4.7). Furthermore, sarcopenia was independently associated with inferior overall survival (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.98; 95% CI, 1.1-8.3; P = .04).ConclusionsOne-third of older adults with cancer in this cohort screened positive for sarcopenia using the SARC-F screening questionnaire, and these positive scores are associated with geriatric assessment domain impairments, reduced health-related quality of life, increased emergency room visits, and inferior overall survival.

Project description:BackgroundSARC-F questionnaire is a simple and convenient tool for sarcopenia screening, and SARC-CalF is a modified version of it. The developments of their Chinese versions are warranted for the clinical use for Chinese population. This study aimed to culturally adapt the SARC-F questionnaire into Chinese using standardized methods, validate the reliability and diagnostic accuracy of the Chinese version SARC-F and SARC-CalF against five sarcopenia diagnosis criteria, and determine optimal cut-off values for clinical practice in Chinese population.MethodsThe translation and cross-cultural adaptation of SARC-F into Chinese were conducted following the methodological report from European Union Geriatric Medicine Society Sarcopenia Special Interest Group. The Chinese version of SARC-F was validated through a diagnostic test, using diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia recommended by the revised 2019 European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People (EWGSOP2) consensus, Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS2019) consensus, the International Working Group on Sarcopenia (IWGS), the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Biomarkers Consortium and the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC). Additional analysis was done against the criteria of severe sarcopenia according to the revised EWGSOP2 and AWGS2019.ResultsThe Chinese version of SARC-F was well translated and demonstrated good reliability and acceptability. The diagnostic test included 1859 community-dwelling older individuals from two medical centers. Against five different definitions of sarcopenia, the Chinese version of SARC-F showed reasonable diagnostic accuracy for sarcopenia screening (AUC 0.614-0.821), and was demonstrated low sensitivity (13.7-37.9%) but high specificity (94.8-97.7%) with a cut-off value of ≥ 4. SARC-CalF significantly enhanced the diagnostic accuracy of SARC-F when using definitions of EWGSOP2, AWGS2019 and IWGS (all P ≤ 0.001). A score of ≥ 2 for SARC-F and ≥ 7 for SARC-CalF were established as optimal cut-off points for identifying older individuals as at risk of sarcopenia in Chinese population.ConclusionsThe Chinese version SARC-F is of reasonable reliability and validity for sarcopenia screening. Despite its low sensitivity, it proves to be a useful tool to identify severe cases in community taking advantage of its simplicity. SARC-CalF appears to be a more suitable screening tool for clinical use in detecting sarcopenia.

Dataset Information

Prognostic utility of self-reported sarcopenia (SARC-F) in the Multiethnic Cohort.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Prognostic utility of self-reported sarcopenia (SARC-F) in the Multiethnic Cohort.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets