Dataset Information

Deployed Deep Learning Kidney Segmentation for Polycystic Kidney Disease MRI.

ABSTRACT: This study develops, validates, and deploys deep learning for automated total kidney volume (TKV) measurement (a marker of disease severity) on T2-weighted MRI studies of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). The model was based on the U-Net architecture with an EfficientNet encoder, developed using 213 abdominal MRI studies in 129 patients with ADPKD. Patients were randomly divided into 70% training, 15% validation, and 15% test sets for model development. Model performance was assessed using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Bland-Altman analysis. External validation in 20 patients from outside institutions demonstrated a DSC of 0.98 (IQR, 0.97-0.99) and a Bland-Altman difference of 2.6% (95% CI: 1.0%, 4.1%). Prospective validation in 53 patients demonstrated a DSC of 0.97 (IQR, 0.94-0.98) and a Bland-Altman difference of 3.6% (95% CI: 2.0%, 5.2%). Last, the efficiency of model-assisted annotation was evaluated on the first 50% of prospective cases (n = 28), with a 51% mean reduction in contouring time (P < .001), from 1724 seconds (95% CI: 1373, 2075) to 723 seconds (95% CI: 555, 892). In conclusion, our deployed artificial intelligence pipeline accurately performs automated segmentation for TKV estimation of polycystic kidneys and reduces expert contouring time. Keywords: Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Segmentation, Kidney ClinicalTrials.gov identification no.: NCT00792155 Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

SUBMITTER: Goel A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8980881 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Deployed Deep Learning Kidney Segmentation for Polycystic Kidney Disease MRI.

Goel Akshay A Shih George G Riyahi Sadjad S Jeph Sunil S Dev Hreedi H Hu Rejoice R Romano Dominick D Teichman Kurt K Blumenfeld Jon D JD Barash Irina I Chicos Ines I Rennert Hanna H Prince Martin R MR

Radiology. Artificial intelligence 20220216 2

This study develops, validates, and deploys deep learning for automated total kidney volume (TKV) measurement (a marker of disease severity) on T2-weighted MRI studies of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD). The model was based on the U-Net architecture with an EfficientNet encoder, developed using 213 abdominal MRI studies in 129 patients with ADPKD. Patients were randomly divided into 70% training, 15% validation, and 15% test sets for model development. Model performance was ...[more]

PMID: 35391774

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundOur aim was to train and test a deep learning-based algorithm for automatically segmenting kidneys and renal cysts in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD).MethodsWe retrospectively selected all ADPKD patients who underwent renal MRI with coronal T2-weighted imaging at our institution from 2008 to 2022. The 20 most recent examinations constituted the test dataset, to mimic pseudoprospective enrolment. The remaining ones constituted the training dataset to which eight normal renal MRIs were added. Kidneys and cysts ground truth segmentations were performed on coronal T2-weighted images by a junior radiologist supervised by an experienced radiologist. Kidneys and cysts of the 20 test MRIs were segmented by the algorithm and three independent human raters. Segmentations were compared using overlap metrics. The total kidney volume (TKV), total cystic volume (TCV), and cystic index (TCV divided by TKV) were compared using Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsWe included 164 ADPKD patients. Dice similarity coefficients ranged from 85.9% to 87.4% between the algorithms and the raters' segmentations and from 84.2% to 86.2% across raters' segmentations. For TCV assessment, the biases ± standard deviations (SD) were 3-19 ± 137-151 mL between the algorithm and the raters, and 22-45 ± 49-57 mL across raters. The algorithm underestimated TKV and TCV in two outliers with TCV > 2800 mL. For cystic index assessment, the biases ± SD were 2.5-6.9% ± 6.7-8.3% between the algorithm and the raters, and 2.1-9.4 ± 7.4-11.6% across raters.ConclusionThe algorithm's performance fell within the range of inter-rater variability, but large TKV and TCV were underestimated.Relevance statementAccurate automated segmentation of the renal cysts will enable the large-scale evaluation of the prognostic value of TCV and cystic index in ADPKD patients. If these biomarkers are prognostic, then automated segmentation will facilitate their use in daily routine.Key pointsCystic volume is an emerging biomarker in ADPKD. The algorithm's performance in segmenting kidneys and cysts fell within interrater variability. The segmentation of very large cysts, under-represented in the training dataset, needs improvement.

Project description:Organ volume measurements are a key metric for managing ADPKD (the most common inherited renal disease). However, measuring organ volumes is tedious and involves manually contouring organ outlines on multiple cross-sectional MRI or CT images. The automation of kidney contouring using deep learning has been proposed, as it has small errors compared to manual contouring. Here, a deployed open-source deep learning ADPKD kidney segmentation pipeline is extended to also measure liver and spleen volumes, which are also important. This 2D U-net deep learning approach was developed with radiologist labeled T2-weighted images from 215 ADPKD subjects (70% training = 151, 30% validation = 64). Additional ADPKD subjects were utilized for prospective (n = 30) and external (n = 30) validations for a total of 275 subjects. Image cropping previously optimized for kidneys was included in training but removed for the validation and inference to accommodate the liver which is closer to the image border. An effective algorithm was developed to adjudicate overlap voxels that are labeled as more than one organ. Left kidney, right kidney, liver and spleen labels had average errors of 3%, 7%, 3%, and 1%, respectively, on external validation and 5%, 6%, 5%, and 1% on prospective validation. Dice scores also showed that the deep learning model was close to the radiologist contouring, measuring 0.98, 0.96, 0.97 and 0.96 on external validation and 0.96, 0.96, 0.96 and 0.95 on prospective validation for left kidney, right kidney, liver and spleen, respectively. The time required for manual correction of deep learning segmentation errors was only 19:17 min compared to 33:04 min for manual segmentations, a 42% time saving (p = 0.004). Standard deviation of model assisted segmentations was reduced to 7, 5, 11, 5 mL for right kidney, left kidney, liver and spleen respectively from 14, 10, 55 and 14 mL for manual segmentations. Thus, deep learning reduces the radiologist time required to perform multiorgan segmentations in ADPKD and reduces measurement variability.

Project description:BackgroundProstate segmentation is an essential step in computer-aided detection and diagnosis systems for prostate cancer. Deep learning (DL)-based methods provide good performance for prostate gland and zones segmentation, but little is known about the impact of manual segmentation (that is, label) selection on their performance. In this work, we investigated these effects by obtaining two different expert label-sets for the PROSTATEx I challenge training dataset (n = 198) and using them, in addition to an in-house dataset (n = 233), to assess the effect on segmentation performance. The automatic segmentation method we used was nnU-Net.ResultsThe selection of training/testing label-set had a significant (p < 0.001) impact on model performance. Furthermore, it was found that model performance was significantly (p < 0.001) higher when the model was trained and tested with the same label-set. Moreover, the results showed that agreement between automatic segmentations was significantly (p < 0.0001) higher than agreement between manual segmentations and that the models were able to outperform the human label-sets used to train them.ConclusionsWe investigated the impact of label-set selection on the performance of a DL-based prostate segmentation model. We found that the use of different sets of manual prostate gland and zone segmentations has a measurable impact on model performance. Nevertheless, DL-based segmentation appeared to have a greater inter-reader agreement than manual segmentation. More thought should be given to the label-set, with a focus on multicenter manual segmentation and agreement on common procedures.Critical relevance statementLabel-set selection significantly impacts the performance of a deep learning-based prostate segmentation model. Models using different label-set showed higher agreement than manual segmentations.Key points• Label-set selection has a significant impact on the performance of automatic segmentation models. • Deep learning-based models demonstrated true learning rather than simply mimicking the label-set. • Automatic segmentation appears to have a greater inter-reader agreement than manual segmentation.

Project description:ObjectivesTo determine the value of a deep learning masked (DLM) auto-fixed volume of interest (VOI) segmentation method as an alternative to manual segmentation for radiomics-based diagnosis of clinically significant (CS) prostate cancer (PCa) on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI).Materials and methodsThis study included a retrospective multi-center dataset of 524 PCa lesions (of which 204 are CS PCa) on bpMRI. All lesions were both semi-automatically segmented with a DLM auto-fixed VOI method (averaging < 10 s per lesion) and manually segmented by an expert uroradiologist (averaging 5 min per lesion). The DLM auto-fixed VOI method uses a spherical VOI (with its center at the location of the lowest apparent diffusion coefficient of the prostate lesion as indicated with a single mouse click) from which non-prostate voxels are removed using a deep learning-based prostate segmentation algorithm. Thirteen different DLM auto-fixed VOI diameters (ranging from 6 to 30 mm) were explored. Extracted radiomics data were split into training and test sets (4:1 ratio). Performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis.ResultsIn the test set, the area under the ROC curve (AUCs) of the DLM auto-fixed VOI method with a VOI diameter of 18 mm (0.76 [95% CI: 0.66-0.85]) was significantly higher (p = 0.0198) than that of the manual segmentation method (0.62 [95% CI: 0.52-0.73]).ConclusionsA DLM auto-fixed VOI segmentation can provide a potentially more accurate radiomics diagnosis of CS PCa than expert manual segmentation while also reducing expert time investment by more than 97%.Key points• Compared to traditional expert-based segmentation, a deep learning mask (DLM) auto-fixed VOI placement is more accurate at detecting CS PCa. • Compared to traditional expert-based segmentation, a DLM auto-fixed VOI placement is faster and can result in a 97% time reduction. • Applying deep learning to an auto-fixed VOI radiomics approach can be valuable.

Dataset Information

Deployed Deep Learning Kidney Segmentation for Polycystic Kidney Disease MRI.

Publications

Deployed Deep Learning Kidney Segmentation for Polycystic Kidney Disease MRI.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets