Dataset Information

The impact of intravenous iron supplementation in elderly patients undergoing major surgery.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Age and preoperative anaemia are risk factors for poor surgical outcome and blood transfusion. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of iron supplementation in iron-deficient (ID) elderly patients undergoing major surgery.

Method

In this single-centre observational study, patients ≥ 65 years undergoing major surgery were screened for anaemia and ID. Patients were assigned to the following groups: A^- (no anaemia); A^-,ID⁺,T⁺ (no anaemia, iron-deficient, intravenous iron supplementation); A⁺ (anaemia); and A⁺,ID⁺,T⁺ (anaemia, iron-deficient, intravenous iron supplementation).

Results

Of 4,381 patients screened at the anaemia walk-in clinic, 2,381 (54%) patients were ≥ 65 years old and 2,191 cases were included in analysis. The ID prevalence was 63% in patients with haemoglobin (Hb) < 8 g/dl, 47.2% in patients with Hb from 8.0 to 8.9 g/dl, and 44.3% in patients with Hb from 9 to 9.9 g/dl. In severely anaemic patients, an Hb increase of 0.6 (0.4; 1.2) and 1.2 (0.7; 1.6) g/dl was detected with iron supplementation 6-10 and > 10 days before surgery, respectively. Hb increased by 0 (-0.1; 0) g/dl with iron supplementation 1-5 days before surgery, 0.2 (-0.1; 0.5) g/dl with iron supplementation 6-10 days before surgery, and 0.2 (-0.2; 1.1) g/dl with supplementation > 10 days before surgery (p < 0.001 for 1-5 vs. 6-10 days). Overall, 58% of A⁺,ID⁺,T⁺ patients showed an Hb increase of > 0.5 g/dl. The number of transfused red blood cell units was significantly lower in patients supplemented with iron (0 (0; 3)) compared to non-treated anaemic patients (1 (0; 4)) (p = 0.03). Patients with iron supplementation > 6 days before surgery achieved mobility 2 days earlier than patients with iron supplementation < 6 days.

Conclusions

Intravenous iron supplementation increases Hb level and thereby reduces blood transfusion rate in elderly surgical patients with ID anaemia.

SUBMITTER: Blum LV

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8988356 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Apr

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The impact of intravenous iron supplementation in elderly patients undergoing major surgery.

Blum Lea Valeska LV Zierentz Philipp P Hof Lotta L Kloka Jan Andreas JA Messroghli Leila L Zacharowski Kai K Meybohm Patrick P Choorapoikayil Suma S

BMC geriatrics 20220407 1

<h4>Background</h4>Age and preoperative anaemia are risk factors for poor surgical outcome and blood transfusion. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of iron supplementation in iron-deficient (ID) elderly patients undergoing major surgery.<h4>Method</h4>In this single-centre observational study, patients ≥ 65 years undergoing major surgery were screened for anaemia and ID. Patients were assigned to the following groups: A<sup>-</sup> (no anaemia); A<sup>-</sup>,ID<sup>+</sup>,T<sup>+ ...[more]

PMID: 35392839

Similar Datasets

Project description:In the intravenous iron therapy to treat iron deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (PREVENTT) trial, the use of intravenous iron did not reduce the need for blood transfusion or reduce patient complications or length of hospital stay. As part of the trial protocol, serum was collected at randomisation and on the day of surgery. These samples were analysed in a central laboratory for markers of iron deficiency. We performed a secondary analysis to explore the potential interactions between pre-operative markers of iron deficiency and intervention status on the trial outcome measures. Absolute iron deficiency was defined as ferritin <30 μg.l-1 ; functional iron deficiency as ferritin 30-100 μg.l-1 or transferrin saturation < 20%; and the remainder as non-iron deficient. Interactions were estimated using generalised linear models that included different subgroup indicators of baseline iron status. Co-primary endpoints were blood transfusion or death and number of blood transfusions, from randomisation to 30 days postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included peri-operative change in haemoglobin, postoperative complications and length of hospital stay. Most patients had iron deficiency (369/452 [82%]) at randomisation; one-third had absolute iron deficiency (144/452 [32%]) and half had functional iron deficiency (225/452 [50%]). The change in pre-operative haemoglobin with intravenous iron compared with placebo was greatest in patients with absolute iron deficiency, mean difference 8.9 g.l-1 , 95%CI 5.3-12.5; moderate in functional iron deficiency, mean difference 2.8 g.l-1 , 95%CI -0.1 to 5.7; and with little change seen in those patients who were non-iron deficient. Subgroup analyses did not suggest that intravenous iron compared with placebo reduced the likelihood of death or blood transfusion at 30 days differentially across subgroups according to baseline ferritin (p = 0.33 for interaction), transferrin saturation (p = 0.13) or in combination (p = 0.45), or for the number of blood transfusions (p = 0.06, 0.29, and 0.39, respectively). There was no beneficial effect of the use of intravenous iron compared with placebo, regardless of the metrics to diagnose iron deficiency, on postoperative complications or length of hospital stay.

Project description:Background Preoperative anemia is associated with an increased need for blood transfusion, complications, and prolonged hospital stay. Iron deficiency anemia (IDA) may be treated with oral or intravenous (IV) iron. IV iron repletes iron stores more rapidly. Its impact on perioperative blood transfusion, postoperative complications, patients' recovery, and long-term quality of life is unclear. Newer agents, such as ferric carboxymaltose (FCM), are costly but have higher maximum approved doses and a very low incidence of anaphylactic-type reactions. This study aims to explore the feasibility of a randomized control trial to compare the preoperative treatment of IDA with IV FCM versus oral ferrous fumarate, in patients undergoing elective major abdominal surgery. Experimental design This is an open-label pilot randomized controlled trial. A total of 30 adults with IDA scheduled for elective major abdominal surgery were recruited for the study. They were randomized into two groups to receive either oral iron or IV FCM. Primary outcomes are defined as the time from enrollment to study drug administration, recruitment rate, and follow-up rate up to three months. Secondary outcomes are hemoglobin rise from recruitment to surgery, perioperative blood transfusion, postoperative complications, EQ-5D-3L scores at baseline, and three months and adverse events related to IV FCM therapy. Results All patients received study drugs within five days of enrollment; 30 patients were recruited within four months, 15 patients in each group. Two in each group were withdrawn for surgery postponement. All patients were followed up for three months and there was no crossover of patients. Per protocol, analysis was performed. No severe adverse events related to IV FCM therapy occurred. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics, similar hemoglobin rise from enrollment to the day of surgery [0.2 (+1.6) g/dL in the FCM group and 0.8 (+0.7) g/dL in the Oral Iron group, p=0.3] and similar mean units of perioperative blood transfused (recruitment to discharge) per patient [1.3 (+ 2.1) in the FCM group and 0.9 (+1.3) in the Oral Iron group, p=0.6]. Postoperatively, there was a similar hospital length of stay [11.5 (+13.6 days) in the FCM group and 9.0 (+9.8 days) in the Oral Iron group, p=0.6]; there were similar postoperative complications as reflected by the average Comprehensive Complication Index [12.8 (+19.6) in the FCM group and 22.6 (+30.7) in the Oral Iron group, p=0.3]; similar postoperative health-related quality of life as reflected by mean EQ-5D-3L scores at one month [70.4 (+21.8) in the FCM group and 84.5 (+12.1) in the Oral Iron group] and three months [80.0 (+18.4) in the FCM group and 85.9 (+10.7) in the Oral Iron group]. Conclusions A full-scale randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness of preoperative IV FCM compared to oral iron in patients with IDA undergoing major abdominal surgery is feasible.

Project description:BackgroundIron deficiency (ID) is the leading cause of anemia worldwide. The prevalence of preoperative ID ranges from 23 to 33%. Preoperative anemia is associated with worse outcomes, making it important to diagnose and treat ID before elective surgery. Several studies indicated the effectiveness of intravenous iron supplementation in iron deficiency with or without anemia (ID(A)). However, it remains challenging to establish reliable evidence due to heterogeneity in utilized study outcomes. The development of a core outcome set (COS) can help to reduce this heterogeneity by proposing a minimal set of meaningful and standardized outcomes. The aim of our systematic review was to identify and assess outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating iron supplementation in iron-deficient patients with or without anemia.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov systematically from 2000 to April 1, 2022. RCTs and observational studies investigating iron supplementation in patients with a preoperative diagnosis of ID(A), were included. Study characteristics and reported outcomes were extracted. Outcomes were categorized according to an established outcome taxonomy. Quality of outcome reporting was assessed with a pre-specified tool. Reported clinically relevant differences for sample size calculation were extracted.ResultsOut of 2898 records, 346 underwent full-text screening and 13 studies (five RCTs, eight observational studies) with sufficient diagnostic inclusion criteria for iron deficiency with or without anemia (ID(A)) were eligible. It is noteworthy to mention that 49 studies were excluded due to no confirmed diagnosis of ID(A). Overall, 111 outcomes were structured into five core areas including nine domains. Most studies (92%) reported outcomes within the 'blood and lymphatic system' domain, followed by "adverse event" (77%) and "need for further resources" (77%). All of the latter reported on the need for blood transfusion. Reported outcomes were heterogeneous in measures and timing. Merely, two (33%) of six prospective studies were registered prospectively of which one (17%) showed no signs of selective outcome reporting.ConclusionThis systematic review comprehensively depicts the heterogeneity of reported outcomes in studies investigating iron supplementation in ID(A) patients regarding exact definitions and timing. Our analysis provides a systematic base for consenting to a minimal COS.Systematic review registrationPROSPERO CRD42020214247.

Dataset Information

The impact of intravenous iron supplementation in elderly patients undergoing major surgery.

Background

Method

Results

Conclusions

Publications

The impact of intravenous iron supplementation in elderly patients undergoing major surgery.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets