Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Background
Somatic EGFR mutations define a subset of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) that have clinical impact on NSCLC risk and outcome. However, EGFR-mutation-status is often missing in epidemiologic datasets. We developed and tested pragmatic approaches to account for EGFR-mutation-status based on variables commonly included in epidemiologic datasets and evaluated the clinical utility of these approaches.Methods
Through analysis of the International Lung Cancer Consortium (ILCCO) epidemiologic datasets, we developed a regression model for EGFR-status; we then applied a clinical-restriction approach using the optimal cut-point, and a second epidemiologic, multiple imputation approach to ILCCO survival analyses that did and did not account for EGFR-status.Results
Of 35,356 ILCCO patients with NSCLC, EGFR-mutation-status was available in 4,231 patients. A model regressing known EGFR-mutation-status on clinical and demographic variables achieved a concordance index of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.74-0.77) in the training and 0.77 (95% CI, 0.74-0.79) in the testing dataset. At an optimal cut-point of probability-score = 0.335, sensitivity = 69% and specificity = 72.5% for determining EGFR-wildtype status. In both restriction-based and imputation-based regression analyses of the individual roles of BMI on overall survival of patients with NSCLC, similar results were observed between overall and EGFR-mutation-negative cohort analyses of patients of all ancestries. However, our approach identified some differences: EGFR-mutated Asian patients did not incur a survival benefit from being obese, as observed in EGFR-wildtype Asian patients.Conclusions
We introduce a pragmatic method to evaluate the potential impact of EGFR-status on epidemiological analyses of NSCLC.Impact
The proposed method is generalizable in the common occurrence in which EGFR-status data are missing.
SUBMITTER: Schmid S
PROVIDER: S-EPMC9063819 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Mar
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Schmid Sabine S Jiang Mei M Brown M Catherine MC Fares Aline A Garcia Miguel M Soriano Joelle J Dong Mei M Thomas Sera S Kohno Takashi T Leal Leticia Ferro LF Diao Nancy N Xie Juntao J Wang Zhichao Z Zaridze David D Holcatova Ivana I Lissowska Jolanta J Świątkowska Beata B Mates Dana D Savic Milan M Wenzlaff Angela S AS Harris Curtis C CC Caporaso Neil E NE Ma Hongxia H Fernandez-Tardon Guillermo G Barnett Matthew J MJ Goodman Gary G Davies Michael P A MPA Pérez-Ríos Mónica M Taylor Fiona F Duell Eric J EJ Schoettker Ben B Brenner Hermann H Andrew Angeline A Cox Angela A Ruano-Ravina Alberto A Field John K JK Marchand Loic Le LL Wang Ying Y Chen Chu C Tardon Adonina A Shete Sanjay S Schabath Matthew B MB Shen Hongbing H Landi Maria Teresa MT Ryan Brid M BM Schwartz Ann G AG Qi Lihong L Sakoda Lori C LC Brennan Paul P Yang Ping P Zhang Jie J Christiani David C DC Reis Rui Manuel RM Shiraishi Kouya K Hung Rayjean J RJ Xu Wei W Liu Geoffrey G
Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology 20220301 3
<h4>Background</h4>Somatic EGFR mutations define a subset of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) that have clinical impact on NSCLC risk and outcome. However, EGFR-mutation-status is often missing in epidemiologic datasets. We developed and tested pragmatic approaches to account for EGFR-mutation-status based on variables commonly included in epidemiologic datasets and evaluated the clinical utility of these approaches.<h4>Methods</h4>Through analysis of the International Lung Cancer Consortium ...[more]