Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Lessons from past pandemics: a systematic review of evidence-based, cost-effective interventions to suppress COVID-19.


ABSTRACT:

Background

In an unparalleled global response, during the COVID-19 pandemic, 90 countries asked 3.9 billion people to stay home. Yet other countries avoided lockdowns and focused on other strategies, like contact tracing. How effective and cost-effective are these strategies? We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the evidence on past pandemic controls, with a focus on cost-effectiveness.

Methods

Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE (1946 to April week 2, 2020) and EMBASE (1974 to April 17, 2020) were searched using a range of terms related to pandemic control. Articles reporting on the effectiveness or cost-effectiveness of at least one intervention were included.

Results

We found 1653 papers; 62 were included. The effectiveness of hand-washing and face masks was supported by randomized trials. These measures were highly cost-effective. For other interventions, only observational and modelling studies were found. They suggested that (1) the most cost-effective interventions are swift contact tracing and case isolation, surveillance networks, protective equipment for healthcare workers, and early vaccination (when available); (2) home quarantines and stockpiling antivirals are less cost-effective; (3) social distancing measures like workplace and school closures are effective but costly, making them the least cost-effective options; (4) combinations are more cost-effective than single interventions; and (5) interventions are more cost-effective when adopted early. For 2009 H1N1 influenza, contact tracing was estimated to be 4363 times more cost-effective than school closure ($2260 vs. $9,860,000 per death prevented).

Conclusions and contributions

For COVID-19, a cautious interpretation suggests that (1) workplace and school closures are effective but costly, especially when adopted late, and (2) scaling up as early as possible a combination of interventions that includes hand-washing, face masks, ample protective equipment for healthcare workers, and swift contact tracing and case isolation is likely to be the most cost-effective strategy.

SUBMITTER: Juneau CE 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9096744 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Lessons from past pandemics: a systematic review of evidence-based, cost-effective interventions to suppress COVID-19.

Juneau Carl-Etienne CE   Pueyo Tomas T   Bell Matt M   Gee Genevieve G   Collazzo Pablo P   Potvin Louise L  

Systematic reviews 20220512 1


<h4>Background</h4>In an unparalleled global response, during the COVID-19 pandemic, 90 countries asked 3.9 billion people to stay home. Yet other countries avoided lockdowns and focused on other strategies, like contact tracing. How effective and cost-effective are these strategies? We aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of the evidence on past pandemic controls, with a focus on cost-effectiveness.<h4>Methods</h4>Following PRISMA guidelines, MEDLINE (1946 to April week 2, 2020) and EMBASE  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC7402078 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9007730 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7441224 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7438224 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10003049 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8675148 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9011856 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7442905 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10094019 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7834581 | biostudies-literature