Dataset Information

Adding Contralaterally Controlled Electrical Stimulation of the Triceps to Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Finger Extensors Reduces Upper Limb Impairment and Improves Reachable Workspace but not Dexterity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

Different methods of neuromuscular electrical stimulation may be used for poststroke upper limb rehabilitation. This study evaluated the effects of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation of the triceps and finger extensors.

Design

This is a randomized controlled trial of 67 participants who were less than 2 yrs poststroke and assigned to the following: (a) arm + hand contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, (b) hand contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, or (c) arm + hand cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Participants were prescribed 10 sessions/week of assigned electrical stimulation at home plus 24 sessions of functional task practice in the laboratory for 12 wks. The primary outcome measure was the Box and Blocks Test. Secondary measures included reachable workspace, Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer, Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale, Arm Motor Abilities Test, and Motor Activity Log.

Results

There were no significant between-group differences on the Box and Blocks Test. At 6 mos after treatment, arm + hand contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation improved reachable workspace more than hand contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, between-group difference of 264 (95% confidence interval = 28-500) cm and more than arm + hand cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation, between-group difference of 281 (95% confidence interval = 22-540) cm. Arm + hand contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation improved Upper Extremity Fugl-Meyer score more than hand contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, between-group difference of 6.7 (95% confidence interval = 0.6-12.7). The between-group differences on the Stroke Upper Limb Capacity Scale and Arm Motor Abilities Test were not significant.

Conclusions

Adding contralaterally controlled elbow extension to hand contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation does not improve on gains in hand dexterity, but it further reduces upper limb impairment and improves reachable workspace measured in the laboratory. However, these additional benefits may not be large enough to be perceived by stroke survivors when they are performing activities of daily living at home.

SUBMITTER: Knutson JS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9131391 | biostudies-literature | 2020 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Adding Contralaterally Controlled Electrical Stimulation of the Triceps to Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Finger Extensors Reduces Upper Limb Impairment and Improves Reachable Workspace but not Dexterity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Knutson Jayme S JS Makowski Nathaniel S NS Harley Mary Y MY Hisel Terri Z TZ Gunzler Douglas D DD Wilson Richard D RD Chae John J

American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation 20200601 6

<h4>Objective</h4>Different methods of neuromuscular electrical stimulation may be used for poststroke upper limb rehabilitation. This study evaluated the effects of contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation of the triceps and finger extensors.<h4>Design</h4>This is a randomized controlled trial of 67 participants who were less than 2 yrs poststroke and assigned to the following: (a) arm + hand contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation, (b) hand contralatera ...[more]

PMID: 32167957

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundMulti-site studies in stroke rehabilitation are important for determining whether a technology and/or treatment can be successfully administered by sites other than the originating site and with similar positive outcomes. This study is the first multi-site clinical trial of a novel intervention for post-stroke upper limb rehabilitation called contralaterally controlled functional electrical stimulation (CCFES). Previous pilot and single-site studies showed positive effects of CCFES on upper limb impairment and hand dexterity in stroke survivors. The main purpose of this study is to confirm and demonstrate the efficacy of CCFES in a larger group of most likely responders across multiple clinical sites.MethodsUp to 129 stroke survivors with moderate to severe upper extremity hemiparesis at 4 clinical trial sites will be randomized to CCFES, cyclic neuromuscular electrical stimulation (cNMES), or task-oriented-training (TOT). Participants will receive 12 weeks of group-specific therapy. Blinded assessments of upper limb impairment and activity limitation, quality of life, and neurophysiology will be used to compare outcomes at baseline, after treatment, and up to 6 months post-treatment. The primary endpoint is change in dexterity from baseline to 6 months post-treatment.DiscussionLoss of hand function following stroke is a major rehabilitation problem affecting millions of people per year globally. More effective rehabilitation therapies are needed to restore hand function in these individuals. This study will determine whether CCFES therapy produces greater improvements in upper extremity function than cNMES or TOT, and will begin to elucidate the different mechanisms underlying each of the three treatments. This multi-site study is a critical step in advancing a novel method of rehabilitation toward clinical translation and widespread dissemination.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03574623 . Registered prior to first enrollment; July 2, 2018.

Project description:IntroductionVirtual Reality/serious games (SG) and functional electrical stimulation (FES) therapies are used in upper limb stroke rehabilitation. A combination of both approaches seems to be beneficial for therapy success. The feasibility of a combination of SG and contralaterally EMG-triggered FES (SG+FES) was investigated as well as the characteristics of responders to such a therapy.Materials and methodsIn a randomized crossover trial, patients performed two gaming conditions: SG alone and SG+FES. Feasibility of the therapy system was assessed using the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory (IMI), the Nasa Task Load Index, and the System Usability Scale (SUS). Gaming parameters, fatigue level and a technical documentation was implemented for further information.ResultsIn total, 18 patients after stroke (62.1 ± 14.1 years) with a unilateral paresis of the upper limb (MRC ≤4) were analyzed in this study. Both conditions were perceived as feasible. Comparing the IMI scores between conditions, perceived competence was significantly increased (z = -2.88, p = 0.004) and pressure/tension during training (z = -2.13, p = 0.034) was decreased during SG+FES. Furthermore, the task load was rated significantly lower for the SG+FES condition (z = -3.14, p = 0.002), especially the physical demand (z = -3.08, p = 0.002), while the performance was rated better (z = -2.59, p = 0.010). Responses to the SUS and the perceived level of fatigue did not differ between conditions (SUS: z = -0.79, p = 0.431; fatigue: z = 1.57, p = 0.115). For patients with mild to moderate impairments (MRC 3-4) the combined therapy provided no or little gaming benefit. The additional use of contralaterally controlled FES (ccFES), however, enabled severely impaired patients (MRC 0-1) to play the SG.DiscussionThe combination of SG with ccFES is feasible and well-accepted among patients after stroke. It seems that the additional use of ccFES may be more beneficial for severely impaired patients as it enables the execution of the serious game. These findings provide valuable implications for the development of rehabilitation systems by combining different therapeutic interventions to increase patients' benefit and proposes system modifications for home use.Clinical trial registrationhttps://drks.de/search/en, DRKS00025761.

Dataset Information

Adding Contralaterally Controlled Electrical Stimulation of the Triceps to Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Finger Extensors Reduces Upper Limb Impairment and Improves Reachable Workspace but not Dexterity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Objective

Design

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Adding Contralaterally Controlled Electrical Stimulation of the Triceps to Contralaterally Controlled Functional Electrical Stimulation of the Finger Extensors Reduces Upper Limb Impairment and Improves Reachable Workspace but not Dexterity: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets