Dataset Information

Impact of System and Diagnostic Errors on Medical Litigation Outcomes: Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models.

ABSTRACT: No prediction models using use conventional logistic models and machine learning exist for medical litigation outcomes involving medical doctors. Using a logistic model and three machine learning models, such as decision tree, random forest, and light-gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), we evaluated the prediction ability for litigation outcomes among medical litigation in Japan. The prediction model with LightGBM had a good predictive ability, with an area under the curve of 0.894 (95% CI; 0.893-0.895) in all patients' data. When evaluating the feature importance using the SHApley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) value, the system error was the most significant predictive factor in all clinical settings for medical doctors' loss in lawsuits. The other predictive factors were diagnostic error in outpatient settings, facility size in inpatients, and procedures or surgery settings. Our prediction model is useful for estimating medical litigation outcomes.

SUBMITTER: Yamamoto N

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9140545 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Impact of System and Diagnostic Errors on Medical Litigation Outcomes: Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models.

Yamamoto Norio N Sukegawa Shintaro S Watari Takashi T

Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) 20220512 5

No prediction models using use conventional logistic models and machine learning exist for medical litigation outcomes involving medical doctors. Using a logistic model and three machine learning models, such as decision tree, random forest, and light-gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), we evaluated the prediction ability for litigation outcomes among medical litigation in Japan. The prediction model with LightGBM had a good predictive ability, with an area under the curve of 0.894 (95% CI; 0. ...[more]

PMID: 35628029

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundDevelopment of emergency department (ED) triage systems that accurately differentiate and prioritize critically ill from stable patients remains challenging. We used machine learning models to predict clinical outcomes, and then compared their performance with that of a conventional approach-the Emergency Severity Index (ESI).MethodsUsing National Hospital and Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) ED data, from 2007 through 2015, we identified all adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years). In the randomly sampled training set (70%), using routinely available triage data as predictors (e.g., demographics, triage vital signs, chief complaints, comorbidities), we developed four machine learning models: Lasso regression, random forest, gradient boosted decision tree, and deep neural network. As the reference model, we constructed a logistic regression model using the five-level ESI data. The clinical outcomes were critical care (admission to intensive care unit or in-hospital death) and hospitalization (direct hospital admission or transfer). In the test set (the remaining 30%), we measured the predictive performance, including area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve (AUC) and net benefit (decision curves) for each model.ResultsOf 135,470 eligible ED visits, 2.1% had critical care outcome and 16.2% had hospitalization outcome. In the critical care outcome prediction, all four machine learning models outperformed the reference model (e.g., AUC, 0.86 [95%CI 0.85-0.87] in the deep neural network vs 0.74 [95%CI 0.72-0.75] in the reference model), with less under-triaged patients in ESI triage levels 3 to 5 (urgent to non-urgent). Likewise, in the hospitalization outcome prediction, all machine learning models outperformed the reference model (e.g., AUC, 0.82 [95%CI 0.82-0.83] in the deep neural network vs 0.69 [95%CI 0.68-0.69] in the reference model) with less over-triages in ESI triage levels 1 to 3 (immediate to urgent). In the decision curve analysis, all machine learning models consistently achieved a greater net benefit-a larger number of appropriate triages considering a trade-off with over-triages-across the range of clinical thresholds.ConclusionsCompared to the conventional approach, the machine learning models demonstrated a superior performance to predict critical care and hospitalization outcomes. The application of modern machine learning models may enhance clinicians' triage decision making, thereby achieving better clinical care and optimal resource utilization.

Project description:BackgroundSchizophrenia (SC) is one of the most common psychiatric diseases. Its potential pathogenic genes and effective treatment methods are still unclear. Cell senescence has been confirmed in mental diseases. A link exists between cellular senescence and immunity, and immune-related problems affect suicide rates in individuals suffering from schizophrenia. Therefore, the aims of this study were to identify candidate genes based on cell senescence that can affect the diagnosis and treatment of schizophrenia.MethodsTwo data sets of schizophrenia were provided by the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, one was taken as training and the other as a validation group. The genes related to cell senescence were obtained from the CellAge database. DEGs were identified using the Limma package and weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA). The function enrichment analysis was conducted, followed by machine learning-based identification for least absolute shrinking and selection operators (LASSO) regression. Random Forest were used to identify candidate immune-related central genes and establish artificial neural networks for verification of the candidate genes. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used for the diagnosis of schizophrenia. Immune cell infiltrates were constructed to study immune cell dysregulation in schizophrenia, and relevant drugs with candidate genes were collected from the DrugBank database.ResultsThirteen co-expression modules were screened for schizophrenia, of which 124 were the most relevant genes.There were 23 intersected genes of schizophrenia (including DEGs and the cellular senescence-related genes), and through machine learning six candidate genes were finally screened out. The diagnostic value was evaluated using the ROC curve data. Based on these results it was confirmed that these candidate genes have high diagnostic value.Two drugs related to candidate genes, Fostamatinib and Ritodine, were collected from the DrugBanks database.ConclusionSix potential candidate genes (SFN, KDM5B, MYLK, IRF3, IRF7, and ID1) had been identified, all of which had diagnostic significance. Fostamatinib might be a drug choice for patients with schizophrenia to develop immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) after treatment, providing effective evidence for the pathogenesis and drug treatment of schizophrenia.

Project description:IntroductionHypothyroidism can be easily misdiagnosed in dogs, and prediction models can support clinical decision-making, avoiding unnecessary testing and treatment. The aim of this study is to develop and internally validate diagnostic prediction models for hypothyroidism in dogs by applying machine-learning algorithms.MethodsA single-institutional cross-sectional study was designed searching the electronic database of a Veterinary Teaching Hospital for dogs tested for hypothyroidism. Hypothyroidism was diagnosed based on suggestive clinical signs and thyroid function tests. Dogs were excluded if medical records were incomplete or a definitive diagnosis was lacking. Predictors identified after data processing were dermatological signs, alopecia, lethargy, hematocrit, serum concentrations of cholesterol, creatinine, total thyroxine (tT4), and thyrotropin (cTSH). Four models were created by combining clinical signs and clinicopathological variables expressed as quantitative (models 1 and 2) and qualitative variables (models 3 and 4). Models 2 and 4 included tT4 and cTSH, models 1 and 3 did not. Six different algorithms were applied to each model. Internal validation was performed using a 10-fold cross-validation. Apparent performance was evaluated by calculating the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC).ResultsEighty-two hypothyroid and 233 euthyroid client-owned dogs were included. The best performing algorithms were naive Bayes in model 1 (AUROC = 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.83-0.86) and in model 2 (AUROC = 0.98; 95% CI = 0.97-0.99), logistic regression in model 3 (AUROC = 0.88; 95% CI = 0.86-0.89), and random forest in model 4 (AUROC = 0.99; 95% CI = 0.98-0.99). Positive predictive value was 0.76, 0.84, 0.93, and 0.97 in model 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. Negative predictive value was 0.89, 0.89, 0.99, and 0.99 in model 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively.DiscussionMachine learning-based prediction models were accurate in predicting and quantifying the likelihood of hypothyroidism in dogs based on internal validation performed in a single-institution, but external validation is required to support the clinical applicability of these models.

Dataset Information

Impact of System and Diagnostic Errors on Medical Litigation Outcomes: Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models.

Publications

Impact of System and Diagnostic Errors on Medical Litigation Outcomes: Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets