Dataset Information

Methadone and suboxone^® mentions on twitter: thematic and sentiment analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

According to the latest medical evidence, Methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone (Suboxone^®) are effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). While the evidence basis for the use of these medications is favorable, less is known about the perceptions of the general public about them.

Objective

This study aimed to use Twitter to assess the public perceptions about methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone, and to compare their discussion contents based on themes/topics, subthemes, and sentiment.

Methods

We conducted a descriptive analysis of a small and automatic analysis of a large volume of microposts ("tweets") that mentioned "methadone" or "suboxone". In the manual analysis, we categorized the tweets into themes and subthemes, as well as by sentiment and personal experience, and compared the information posted about these two medications. We performed automatic topic modeling and sentiment analysis over large volumes of posts and compared the outputs to those from the manual analyses.

Results

We manually analyzed 900 tweets, most of which related to access (15.3% for methadone; 14.3% for buprenorphine-naloxone), stigma (17.0%; 15.5%), and OUD treatment (12.8%; 15.6%). Only a small proportion of tweets (16.4% for Suboxone^® and 9.3% for methadone) expressed positive sentiments about the medications, with few tweets describing personal experiences. Tweets mentioning both medications primarily discussed MOUD broadly, rather than comparing the two medications directly. Automatic topic modeling revealed topics from the larger dataset that corresponded closely to the manually identified themes, but sentiment analysis did not reveal any notable differences in chatter regarding the two medications.

Conclusions

Twitter content about methadone and Suboxone^® is similar, with the same major themes and similar sub-themes. Despite the proven effectiveness of these medications, there was little dialogue related to their benefits or efficacy in the treatment of OUD. Perceptions of these medications may contribute to their underutilization in combatting OUDs.

SUBMITTER: Chenworth M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9177078 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Methadone and suboxone<sup>®</sup> mentions on twitter: thematic and sentiment analysis.

Chenworth Megan M Perrone Jeanmarie J Love Jennifer S JS Graves Rachel R Hogg-Bremer Whitney W Sarker Abeed A

Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) 20210406 11

<h4>Background</h4>According to the latest medical evidence, Methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone (Suboxone<sup>®</sup>) are effective treatments for opioid use disorder (OUD). While the evidence basis for the use of these medications is favorable, less is known about the perceptions of the general public about them.<h4>Objective</h4>This study aimed to use Twitter to assess the public perceptions about methadone and buprenorphine-naloxone, and to compare their discussion contents based on theme ...[more]

PMID: 33821724

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCo-use of alcohol and e-cigarettes (often called vaping) has been linked with long-term health outcomes, including increased risk for substance use disorder. Co-use may have been exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic. Social networking sites may offer insights into current perspectives on polysubstance use.ObjectiveThe aims of this study were to investigate concurrent mentions of vaping and alcohol on Twitter (subsequently rebranded X) during a time of changing vaping regulations in the United States and the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsTweets including both vape- and alcohol-related terms posted between October 2019 and September 2020 were analyzed using latent Dirichlet allocation modeling. Distinct topics were identified and described.ResultsThree topics were identified across 6437 tweets: (1) flavors and flavor ban (n=3334, 51.8% of tweets), (2) co-use discourse (n=1119, 17.4%), and (3) availability and access regulation (n=1984, 30.8%). Co-use discussions often portrayed co-use as positive and prosocial. Tweets focused on regulation often used alcohol regulations for comparison. Some focused on the perceived overregulation of vaping (compared to alcohol), while others supported limiting youth access but not at the expense of adult access (eg, stronger age verification over product bans). Across topics, vaping was typically portrayed as less harmful than alcohol use. The benefits of flavors for adult smoking cessation were also discussed. The distribution of topics across time varied across both pre- and post-regulatory change and pre- and post-COVID-19 pandemic declaration periods, suggesting shifts in topic focus salience across time.ConclusionsCo-use discussions on social media during this time of regulatory change and social upheaval typically portrayed both vaping and alcohol use in a positive light. It also included debates surrounding the differences in regulation of the 2 substances-particularly as it related to limiting youth access. Emergent themes from the analysis suggest that alcohol was perceived as more harmful but less regulated and more accessible to underage youth than vaping products. Frequent discussions and comparisons of the 2 substances as it relates to their regulation emphasize the still-evolving vaping policy landscape. Social media content analyses during times of change may help regulators and policy makers to better understand and respond to common concerns and potential misconceptions surrounding drug-related policies and accessibility.

Project description:BackgroundBiomedical research has traditionally been conducted via surveys and the analysis of medical records. However, these resources are limited in their content, such that non-traditional domains (eg, online forums and social media) have an opportunity to supplement the view of an individual's health.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to develop a scalable framework to detect personal health status mentions on Twitter and assess the extent to which such information is disclosed.MethodsWe collected more than 250 million tweets via the Twitter streaming API over a 2-month period in 2014. The corpus was filtered down to approximately 250,000 tweets, stratified across 34 high-impact health issues, based on guidance from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We created a labeled corpus of several thousand tweets via a survey, administered over Amazon Mechanical Turk, that documents when terms correspond to mentions of personal health issues or an alternative (eg, a metaphor). We engineered a scalable classifier for personal health mentions via feature selection and assessed its potential over the health issues. We further investigated the utility of the tweets by determining the extent to which Twitter users disclose personal health status.ResultsOur investigation yielded several notable findings. First, we find that tweets from a small subset of the health issues can train a scalable classifier to detect health mentions. Specifically, training on 2000 tweets from four health issues (cancer, depression, hypertension, and leukemia) yielded a classifier with precision of 0.77 on all 34 health issues. Second, Twitter users disclosed personal health status for all health issues. Notably, personal health status was disclosed over 50% of the time for 11 out of 34 (33%) investigated health issues. Third, the disclosure rate was dependent on the health issue in a statistically significant manner (P<.001). For instance, more than 80% of the tweets about migraines (83/100) and allergies (85/100) communicated personal health status, while only around 10% of the tweets about obesity (13/100) and heart attack (12/100) did so. Fourth, the likelihood that people disclose their own versus other people's health status was dependent on health issue in a statistically significant manner as well (P<.001). For example, 69% (69/100) of the insomnia tweets disclosed the author's status, while only 1% (1/100) disclosed another person's status. By contrast, 1% (1/100) of the Down syndrome tweets disclosed the author's status, while 21% (21/100) disclosed another person's status.ConclusionsIt is possible to automatically detect personal health status mentions on Twitter in a scalable manner. These mentions correspond to the health issues of the Twitter users themselves, but also other individuals. Though this study did not investigate the veracity of such statements, we anticipate such information may be useful in supplementing traditional health-related sources for research purposes.

Project description:BackgroundMenthol cigarettes are used disproportionately by African American, female, and adolescent smokers. Twitter is also used disproportionately by minority and younger populations, providing a unique window into conversations reflecting social norms, behavioral intentions, and sentiment toward menthol cigarettes.ObjectiveOur purpose was to identify the content and frequency of conversations about menthol cigarettes, including themes, populations, user smoking status, other tobacco or substances, tweet characteristics, and sentiment. We also examined differences in menthol cigarette sentiment by prevalent categories, which allowed us to assess potential perceptions, misperceptions, and social norms about menthol cigarettes on Twitter. This approach can inform communication about these products, particularly to subgroups who are at risk for menthol cigarette use.MethodsThrough a combination of human and machine classification, we identified 94,627 menthol cigarette-relevant tweets from February 1, 2012 to January 31, 2013 (1 year) from over 47 million tobacco-related messages gathered prospectively from the Twitter Firehose of all public tweets and metadata. Then, 4 human coders evaluated a random sample of 7000 tweets for categories, including sentiment toward menthol cigarettes.ResultsWe found that 47.98% (3194/6657) of tweets expressed positive sentiment, while 40.26% (2680/6657) were negative toward menthol cigarettes. The majority of tweets by likely smokers (2653/4038, 65.70%) expressed positive sentiment, while 91.2% (320/351) of nonsmokers and 71.7% (91/127) of former smokers indicated negative views. Positive views toward menthol cigarettes were predominant in tweets that discussed addiction or craving, marijuana, smoking, taste or sensation, song lyrics, and tobacco industry or marketing or tweets that were commercial in nature. Negative views toward menthol were more common in tweets about smoking cessation, health, African Americans, women, and children and adolescents-largely due to expression of negative stereotypes associated with these groups' use of menthol cigarettes.ConclusionsExaminations of public opinions toward menthol cigarettes through social media can help to inform the framing of public communication about menthol cigarettes, particularly in light of potential regulation by the European Union, US Food and Drug Administration, other jurisdictions, and localities.