Dataset Information

CT-based radiomics analysis for differentiation between thymoma and thymic carcinoma.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The purpose of our study was to differentiate between thymoma and thymic carcinoma using a radiomics analysis based on the computed tomography (CT) image features.

Methods

The CT images of 61 patients with thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT with slice thickness <1 mm were analyzed. Pathological examination of the surgical specimens revealed thymoma in 45 and thymic carcinoma in 16. Tumor volume and the ratio of major axis to minor axis were calculated using a computer-aided diagnostic software. Sixty-one different radiomics features in the segmented CT images were extracted, then filtered and minimized by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression to select the optimal radiomics features for predicting thymic carcinoma. The association between the quantitative values and a diagnosis of thymic carcinoma were analyzed with logistic regression models. Parameters identified as significant in univariate analysis were included in multiple analyses. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were assessed to evaluate the diagnostic performance.

Results

Thymic carcinoma was significantly predominant in men (P=0.001). Optimal radiomics features for predicting thymic carcinoma were as follows: gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM)-homogeneity, GLCM-energy, compactness, large zone high gray-level emphasis (LZHGE), solidity, size of minor axis, and kurtosis. Multiple logistic regression analysis of these features revealed solidity and GLCM-energy as independent indicators associated with thymic carcinoma [odds ratio, 14.7 and 14.3; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6-139.0 and 3.0-68.7; and P=0.045 and 0.002, respectively]. Area under the curve (AUC) for diagnosing thymic carcinoma was 0.882 (sensitivity, 81.2%; specificity, 91.1%). Multivariate analysis adjusted for sex similarly revealed two features (solidity and GLCM-energy) as independent indicators associated with thymic carcinoma (odds ratio, 14.6 and 23.9; 95% CI: 2.4-89.2 and 1.9-302.8; P=0.004 and 0.014, respectively). Adjusted AUC for diagnosing thymic carcinoma was 0.921 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97): sensitivity, 62.5% and specificity, 100%.

Conclusions

Two texture features (GLCM-energy and solidity) were significant predictors of thymic carcinoma.

SUBMITTER: Ohira R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9186235 | biostudies-literature | 2022 May

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

CT-based radiomics analysis for differentiation between thymoma and thymic carcinoma.

Ohira Ryosuke R Yanagawa Masahiro M Suzuki Yuki Y Hata Akinori A Miyata Tomo T Kikuchi Noriko N Yoshida Yuriko Y Yamagata Kazuki K Doi Shuhei S Ninomiya Keisuke K Tomiyama Noriyuki N

Journal of thoracic disease 20220501 5

<h4>Background</h4>The purpose of our study was to differentiate between thymoma and thymic carcinoma using a radiomics analysis based on the computed tomography (CT) image features.<h4>Methods</h4>The CT images of 61 patients with thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) who underwent contrast-enhanced CT with slice thickness <1 mm were analyzed. Pathological examination of the surgical specimens revealed thymoma in 45 and thymic carcinoma in 16. Tumor volume and the ratio of major axis to minor axis we ...[more]

PMID: 35693628

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectivesTo develop and validate nomograms combining radiomics and semantic features to identify the invasiveness and histopathological risk stratification of thymic epithelial tumors (TET) using contrast-enhanced CT.MethodsThis retrospective multi-center study included 224 consecutive cases. For each case, 6764 intratumor and peritumor radiomics features and 31 semantic features were collected. Multi-feature selections and decision tree models were performed on radiomics features and semantic features separately to select the most important features for Masaoka-Koga staging and WHO classification. The selected features were then combined to create nomograms for the two systems. The performance of the radiomics model, semantic model, and combined model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs).ResultsOne hundred eighty-seven cases (56.5 years ± 12.3, 101 men) were included, with 62 cases as the external test set. For Masaoka-Koga staging, the combined model, which incorporated five peritumor radiomics features and four semantic features, showed an AUC of 0.958 (95% CI: 0.912-1.000) in distinguishing between early-stage (stage I/II) and advanced-stage (III/IV) TET in the external test set. For WHO classification, the combined model incorporating five peritumor radiomics features and two semantic features showed an AUC of 0.857 (0.760-0.955) in differentiating low-risk (type A/AB/B1) and high-risk (B2/B3/C) TET. The combined models showed the most effective predictive performance, while the semantic models exhibited comparable performance to the radiomics models in both systems (p > 0.05).ConclusionThe nomograms combining peritumor radiomics features and semantic features could help in increasing the accuracy of grading invasiveness and risk stratification of TET.Critical relevance statementPeripheral invasion and histopathological type are major determinants of treatment and prognosis of TET. The integration of peritumoral radiomics features and semantic features into nomograms may enhance the accuracy of grading invasiveness and risk stratification of TET.Key pointsPeritumor region of TET may suggest histopathological and invasive risk. Peritumor radiomic and semantic features allow classification by Masaoka-Koga staging (AUC: 0.958). Peritumor radiomic and semantic features enable the classification of histopathological risk (AUC: 0.857).

Project description:Objective This study aims to investigate the value of machine learning models based on clinical-radiological features and multiphasic CT radiomics features in the differentiation of benign parotid tumors (BPTs) and malignant parotid tumors (MPTs). Methods This retrospective study included 312 patients (205 cases of BPTs and 107 cases of MPTs) who underwent multiphasic enhanced CT examinations, which were randomly divided into training (N = 218) and test (N = 94) sets. The radiomics features were extracted from the plain, arterial, and venous phases. The synthetic minority oversampling technique was used to balance minority class samples in the training set. Feature selection methods were done using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO), mutual information (MI), and recursive feature extraction (RFE). Two machine learning classifiers, support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR), were then combined in pairs with three feature selection methods to build different radiomics models. Meanwhile, the prediction performances of different radiomics models based on single phase (plain, arterial, and venous phase) and multiphase (three-phase combination) were compared to determine which model construction method and phase were more discriminative. In addition, clinical models based on clinical-radiological features and combined models integrating radiomics features and clinical-radiological features were established. The prediction performances of the different models were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and the drawing of calibration curves. Results Among the 24 established radiomics models composed of four different phases, three feature selection methods, and two machine learning classifiers, the LASSO-SVM model based on a three-phase combination had the optimal prediction performance with AUC (0.936 [95% CI = 0.866, 0.976]), sensitivity (0.78), specificity (0.90), and accuracy (0.86) in the test set, and its prediction performance was significantly better than with the clinical model based on LR (AUC = 0.781, p = 0.012). In the test set, the combined model based on LR had a lower AUC than the optimal radiomics model (AUC = 0.933 vs. 0.936), but no statistically significant difference (p = 0.888). Conclusion Multiphasic CT-based radiomics analysis showed a machine learning model based on clinical-radiological features and radiomics features has the potential to provide a valuable tool for discriminating benign from malignant parotid tumors.

Dataset Information

CT-based radiomics analysis for differentiation between thymoma and thymic carcinoma.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

CT-based radiomics analysis for differentiation between thymoma and thymic carcinoma.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets