Dataset Information

Validation of Korean Version of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Little is known about the impact of financial toxicity in disease-free breast cancer survivors. We aim to validate the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity in Korean (COST-K) and evaluate financial toxicity among disease-free breast cancer survivors.

Materials and methods

We conducted linguistic validation following a standardized methodology recommended by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy multilingual translation (FACITtrans). For psychometric validation, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with 4,297 disease-free breast cancer survivors at a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea between November 2018 and April 2019. Survivors were asked to complete the COST-K and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaires. The test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and validity of the COST-K were assessed using standard scale construction techniques.

Results

The COST-K demonstrated good internal consistency, with a Cronbach's α of 0.81. The test-retest analysis revealed an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.78. The COST-K had moderate correlation (r=-0.60) with the financial difficulty item of the EORTC QLQ-C30 and week correlation with the items on acute and chronic symptom burdens (nausea/vomiting, -0.18; constipation, -0.14; diarrhea, -0.14), showing good convergent and divergent validity. The median COST-K was 27 (range, 0 to 44; mean±standard deivation [SD], 27.1±7.5) and about 30% and 5% of cancer survivors experienced mild and severe financial toxicity, respectively. Younger age, lower education, lower household income was associated with higher financial toxicity.

Conclusion

The COST-K is a valid and reliable instrument for measuring financial toxicity in disease-free breast cancer survivors. Considering its impact on the health-related quality of life, more studies need to be conducted to evaluate financial toxicity in cancer survivors and design interventions.

SUBMITTER: Shim S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9296937 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Validation of Korean Version of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

Shim Sungkeun S Kang Danbee D Kim Nayeon N Han Gayeon G Lim Jihyun J Kim Hyunsoo H Park Jeonghyun J Lee Mankyung M Lee Jeong Eon JE Kim Seok Won SW Yu Jonghan J Chae Byung Joo BJ Ryu Jai Min JM Nam Seok Jin SJ Lee Se Kyung SK Cho Juhee J

Cancer research and treatment 20211013 3

<h4>Purpose</h4>Little is known about the impact of financial toxicity in disease-free breast cancer survivors. We aim to validate the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity in Korean (COST-K) and evaluate financial toxicity among disease-free breast cancer survivors.<h4>Materials and methods</h4>We conducted linguistic validation following a standardized methodology recommended by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy multilingual translation (FACITtrans). For psychometric valida ...[more]

PMID: 34645130

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCancer and its treatment lead to increased financial distress for patients. To the authors' knowledge, to date, no standardized patient-reported outcome measure has been validated to assess this distress.MethodsPatients with AJCC Stage IV solid tumors receiving chemotherapy for at least 2 months were recruited. Financial toxicity was measured by the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) measure. The authors collected data regarding patient characteristics, clinical trial participation, health care use, willingness to discuss costs, psychological distress (Brief Profile of Mood States [POMS]), and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) as measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy: General (FACT-G) and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL questionnaires. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and validity of the COST measure were assessed using standard-scale construction techniques. Associations between the resulting factors and other variables were assessed using multivariable analyses.ResultsA total of 375 patients with advanced cancer were approached, 233 of whom (62.1%) agreed to participate. The COST measure demonstrated high internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Factor analyses revealed a coherent, single, latent variable (financial toxicity). COST values were found to be correlated with income (correlation coefficient [r] = 0.28; P<.001), psychosocial distress (r = -0.26; P<.001), and HRQOL, as measured by the FACT-G (r = 0.42; P<.001) and by the EORTC QOL instruments (r = 0.33; P<.001). Independent factors found to be associated with financial toxicity were race (P = .04), employment status (P<.001), income (P = .003), number of inpatient admissions (P = .01), and psychological distress (P = .003). Willingness to discuss costs was not found to be associated with the degree of financial distress (P = .49).ConclusionsThe COST measure demonstrated reliability and validity in measuring financial toxicity. Its correlation with HRQOL indicates that financial toxicity is a clinically relevant patient-centered outcome. Cancer 2017;123:476-484. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Project description:BackgroundFinancial toxicity from cancer treatments is rising as an important patient-reported outcome. Its relevance was first assessed in the context of privately financed healthcare system, where the financial hardship caused by out-of-pocket payments negatively affects survival, while fewer evidence exists on its role in countries where care is financed by the public health care system. Head and Neck Cancer (HNC) patients face an increased risk for financial toxicity due to multimodal treatment and relevant out of pocket costs. The aim of this study was to develop and validate an Italian version of the Canadian Financial Index of Toxicity (FIT) questionnaire, defined FITALY.MethodsFIT questionnaire was translated through a forward-backward process by two investigators independently, and the process was reviewed by a certified medical scientific English native speaker. Once reached consensus upon Italian translation, two Health Economics experts were consulted to adapt the questionnaire to Italian socio-economic context. The FITALY questionnaire v1.0 hereby developed was anonymously administered to two consecutive groups of 30 patients who had received curative, multimodal treatment for HNC cancer at ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Italy. A cognitive debriefing form was simultaneously administered to ask patients to exclude recurring and redundant items and include new relevant items.ResultsThe 14-item FITALY questionnaire provides a global evaluation of financial toxicity ranging from 0 to 100. The questionnaire is divided into 4 domains: financial burden (6 items), exploring the objective financial toxicity burden; financial distress (2 items), which refers to the psychological distress related to financial toxicity; out-of-pocket costs (4 items), which focus on medical expenses paid by the patient; and loss of productivity (2 items), that investigates the disease impact on both patient's and caregiver's job activity.ConclusionsStarting from the Canadian 9-item FIT questionnaire, we developed and validated the Italian 14-item FITALY questionnaire. Prospective application to a cohort of Italian HNC patients is ongoing.

Dataset Information

Validation of Korean Version of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Validation of Korean Version of the COmprehensive Score for financial Toxicity (COST) Among Breast Cancer Survivors.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets