Unknown

Dataset Information

0

A Comparative Study of Skeletal and Dental Outcome between Transcutaneous External Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis and Conventional Rigid External Device in Treating Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Traditional distraction osteogenesis (DO) with the tooth-borne rigid external device (RED) system was regularly used in treating patients with cleft-related maxillary hypoplasia. However, the bone-borne RED system with miniplates and bone screws has currently become an effective treatment. This retrospective study was to compare bone-borne RED with traditional tooth-borne RED in distraction effectiveness, blood loss, operative time, and long-term stability.

Methods

Twenty-two growing patients who underwent RED therapy were divided into two groups: eleven patients utilizing the bone-borne RED system with the transcutaneous wire attached with skeletal anchorage; another eleven patients using the traditional tooth-borne RED system with the intra-oral device attached with dental anchorage. Serial lateral cephalograms were analyzed for comparing treatment outcomes and stability in 1 month, 6 months, and 1.5 years after distraction.

Results

In bone-borne RED group, the maxilla was advanced by 19.98 mm with slight clockwise rotation of 0.40° and minimal palatal inclination change of incisor by -3.94°. In traditional tooth-borne RED group, the maxilla showed less advancement by 14.52 mm, with significant counter-clockwise rotation of -11.23° and excessive palatal inclination change of incisor by -10.86°. Although operative time was longer in the bone-borne RED group by 38.4 min, this did not bring about greater blood loss.

Conclusions

the bone-borne RED via transcutaneous wire system provides an easy, simple, and comfortable procedure as well as favorable long-term stability in maxillary distraction.

SUBMITTER: Tsai CY 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9324202 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Jun

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

A Comparative Study of Skeletal and Dental Outcome between Transcutaneous External Maxillary Distraction Osteogenesis and Conventional Rigid External Device in Treating Cleft Lip and Palate Patients.

Tsai Chi-Yu CY   Lee Yi-Hao YH   Wu Te-Ju TJ   Lin Shiu-Shiung SS   Lai Jui-Pin JP   Chang Yu-Jen YJ  

Journal of personalized medicine 20220629 7


<h4>Background</h4>Traditional distraction osteogenesis (DO) with the tooth-borne rigid external device (RED) system was regularly used in treating patients with cleft-related maxillary hypoplasia. However, the bone-borne RED system with miniplates and bone screws has currently become an effective treatment. This retrospective study was to compare bone-borne RED with traditional tooth-borne RED in distraction effectiveness, blood loss, operative time, and long-term stability.<h4>Methods</h4>Twen  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC5551328 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC11575218 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10056267 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4219916 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC11370301 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9598851 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7769421 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9422610 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC8032269 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3925974 | biostudies-literature