Dataset Information

Predicting the individualized risk of nonadherence to zoledronic acid among osteoporosis patients receiving the first infusion of zoledronic acid: development and validation of new predictive nomograms.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Achieving optimal adherence to zoledronic acid (ZOL) among osteoporosis (OP) patients is a challenging task. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a precise and efficient prediction tool for ZOL nonadherence risk in OP patients.

Methods

We prospectively collected and analyzed survey data from a clinical registry. A total of 1010 OP patients treated for the first time with ZOL in two separate hospitals were selected for nonadherence analysis. The evaluation included a 16-item ZOL Nonadherence Questionnaire and potential risk factors for ZOL nonadherence were assessed via univariate and multivariate analyses. We next developed and validated two distinct-stage nomograms. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical usefulness of the predicting models were assessed using the area under the curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

The total nonadherence rate was 20.30% after the first ZOL infusion. To generate a model predicting ZOL nonadherence risk, six predictors of 16 items were retained. Model 2 (AUC, 0.8486; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8171-0.8801) exhibited considerably more discrimination in desirable functional outcomes, relative to Model 1 (AUC, 0.7644; 95% CI, 0.7265-0.8024). The calibration curves displayed good calibration. DCA revealed that a cutoff probability of 5-54% (Model 1) and 1-85% (Model 2) indicated that the models were clinically useful. External validation also exhibited good discrimination and calibration.

Conclusions

This study developed and validated two novel, distinct-stage prediction nomograms that precisely estimate nonadherence risk among OP patients receiving the first infusion of ZOL. However, additional evaluation and external validation are necessary prior to widespread implementation.

SUBMITTER: Li C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9340933 | biostudies-literature | 2022

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Predicting the individualized risk of nonadherence to zoledronic acid among osteoporosis patients receiving the first infusion of zoledronic acid: development and validation of new predictive nomograms.

Li Chong C Lu Ke K Shi Qin Q Gong Ya-Qin YQ

Therapeutic advances in chronic disease 20220730

<h4>Introduction</h4>Achieving optimal adherence to zoledronic acid (ZOL) among osteoporosis (OP) patients is a challenging task. Here, we aimed to develop and validate a precise and efficient prediction tool for ZOL nonadherence risk in OP patients.<h4>Methods</h4>We prospectively collected and analyzed survey data from a clinical registry. A total of 1010 OP patients treated for the first time with ZOL in two separate hospitals were selected for nonadherence analysis. The evaluation included a ...[more]

PMID: 35924011

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTo assess prognostic and predictive effects of clinical and biochemical factors in our published randomized study of a weekly low dose (metronomic arm) versus a conventional dosage of zoledronic acid (conventional arm) in breast cancer patients with bone metastases.MethodsTreatment outcome of 60 patients with bone metastases were used to assess impacts of following potential prognostic factors, estrogen receptor status, lymph node status, 2 year-disease free interval (DFI), numbers of chemotherapy regimens administered, interventions, and serum levels of VEGF, N-telopeptide of type I collagen (NTx), CEA, and CA 15-3.ResultsIn univariate analyses, patients pretreated with 2 or fewer chemotherapy regimens, ER-positive tumors, 3 or fewer lymph nodes, DFI of more than 2 years, serum VEGF of less than 500 pg/mL after 3 months of intervention, serum CEA and CA 15-3 of less than ULN, and baseline serum NTx of less than 18 nM BCE had significantly longer progression free survival (PFS). The multivariate analysis showed that ER positivity (hazard ratio [HR], 0.295; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.141-0.618; P = 0.001), serum VEGF of less than 500 pg/mL after 3 months of intervention (HR, 2.220; 95% CI, 1.136-4.338; P = 0.020), baseline serum NTx of less than 18 nM BCE (HR, 2.842; 95% CI, 1.458-5.539; P = 0.001), and 2 or fewer chemotherapy regimens received (HR, 7.803; 95% CI, 2.884-21.112; P = 0.000) were associated with a better PFS. When evaluating the predictive effect of the biochemical factors, an interaction between NTx and zoledronic acid intervention was shown (P = 0.005). The HR of weekly low dose versus a conventional dosage of zoledronic acid was estimated to be 2.309 (99% CI, 1.067-5.012) in patients with baseline serum NTx of more than 18 nM BCE, indicating a superiority of weekly low dose of zoledronic acid.ConclusionsER, serum VEGF level after intervention, and numbers of chemotherapy regimens administered are prognostic but not predictive factors in breast cancer patients with bone metastases. Patients with baseline serum NTx of more than 18 nM BCE might benefit more from weekly low-dose of zoledronic acid.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov unique identifier: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00524849.

Project description:PurposeBariatric surgery is an effective treatment for severe obesity but causes substantial bone loss and increased risk of fractures. To date, there have been no studies examining whether pharmacologic treatments can prevent bone loss after bariatric surgery. We performed an exploratory study to examine the preliminary safety and efficacy of zoledronic acid (ZOL), a potent anti-resorptive bisphosphonate, to suppress bone turnover markers (BTM) and prevent declines in bone mineral density (BMD) after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.MethodsWe performed an open-label pilot study of pre-operative ZOL in postmenopausal women with obesity who were planning RYGB (n = 4). A single dose of zoledronic acid 5 mg was given intravenously prior to RYGB. Serum bone biochemistries including C-telopeptide (CTX) and procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP) were measured at multiple timepoints throughout the 24-week study. BMD was also obtained at the spine and hip by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and at the trabecular spine by quantitative computed tomography (QCT) at pre-operative baseline and 24 weeks. Results were compared against pre-operative baseline and against changes among RYGB historical controls (n = 10).ResultsAt 2 weeks after RYGB, there was a nonsignificant trend for CTX and P1NP levels to be lower than baseline levels in the ZOL group. By 24 weeks after RYGB, however, participants who received ZOL had a significant increase in CTX above pre-operative baseline (+0.228 ± 0.117 ng/dL, p = 0.030) but this CTX rise was less than that observed in the controls (+0.601 ± 0.307 ng/dL, p = 0.042 between groups). Despite ZOL use, participants had significant areal BMD loss at the total hip as compared to pre-operative baseline (-4.2 ± 1.5%, p = 0.012) that was similar in magnitude to total hip BMD loss in the controls (-5.5 ± 3.9%, p = 0.005). There was a suggestion that the ZOL group might be protected against trabecular spine volumetric bone loss as compared to the control group (+4.8 ± 8.0% vs. -5.9 ± 7.0%, p = 0.075 between groups). Serum calcium, 25-hydroxyvitamin D, and parathyroid hormone did not change in either group. No hypocalcemia or serious adverse events were reported after ZOL.ConclusionIn this proof of concept study, a single dose of ZOL prior to RYGB appeared to transiently mitigate but not fully prevent high bone turnover in the acute postoperative period. At 24 weeks after RYGB, our preliminary data suggest that ZOL was not sufficient to prevent bone loss at the hip, although it may preserve bone density at the trabecular spine. Further prospective, controlled studies are needed to confirm our findings and to identify the best strategies for preventing bone loss in bariatric patients receiving RYGB.

Project description:ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of zoledronic acid on muscle metabolism in mice with osteoporosis and sarcopenia and elucidate the possible underlying mechanism.MethodsTwenty-four 8-week-old male C57BL/6J mice were randomly divided into four groups: non-suspension (N-SUS), suspension (SUS), suspension + zoledronic acid (ZA), and suspension + PTH(PTH) groups. Equal doses of saline, zoledronic acid, and PTH were administered subcutaneously. After 4 weeks, the mice were sacrificed, and body weight and muscle mass (gastrocnemius and soleus) were measured, the right tibia of mice was taken for micro-CT examination, and the muscle specimens were analyzed using HE staining, ATPase staining, western blotting, and real-time PCR.ResultsCompared with the N-SUS group, the bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone relative volume (BV/TV) and trabecular bone number (Tb.N) were significantly decreased in the SUS group (P < 0.01), the trabecular bone separation(Tb.Sp)was significantly increased (P < 0.01), which was reversed in ZA and PTH group (P < 0.01).Compared to the SUS group, the body and muscle weights of the ZA and PTH groups were significantly increased. Compared to the SUS group, the muscle structure was less damaged, the proportion of type I muscle fibers was increased, and the protein expression of β-catenin and AKT were upregulated in the ZA and PTH groups(P < 0.05). In addition, the mRNA expression levels of Wnt3a, Wnt16, Myf5, and PI3K were significantly increased (P < 0.05), where as those of Myogenic Differentiation Antigen(MyoD )and Myogenin (MyoG) were significantly decreased (P < 0.05). No significant differences were observed between the ZA and PTH groups.ConclusionsZoledronic acid can reduce muscle loss and damage by upregulating the mRNA expression of Wnt and PI3K and the protein expression of β-catenin and AKT.Our results provide a novel basis for the development of drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis combined with sarcopenia.

Dataset Information

Predicting the individualized risk of nonadherence to zoledronic acid among osteoporosis patients receiving the first infusion of zoledronic acid: development and validation of new predictive nomograms.

Introduction

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Predicting the individualized risk of nonadherence to zoledronic acid among osteoporosis patients receiving the first infusion of zoledronic acid: development and validation of new predictive nomograms.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets