Dataset Information

Pulmonary rehabilitation ameliorates regional lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective single-arm clinical trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a widely recognized nonpharmacologic therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but most of the current studies on whether PR can benefit COPD patients are based on the evaluation of symptoms and pulmonary function, which is limited to a certain extent. Because COPD is characterized by potential regional lung changes in morphology and pathophysiology, this study was designed to evaluate the effects of individualized PR on regional lung function in patients with stable COPD.

Methods

In this study, patients with stable COPD who met the criteria were included, and they were treated with PR for 2 weeks using the respiratory rehabilitation training instrument. The symptoms, and global and regional lung function before and after 2 weeks of PR treatment were evaluated using surveys, spirometry, and electrical impedance tomography (EIT), respectively. The spatial coefficient of variation (CV) of regional spirometry parameters were calculated to quantify spatial heterogeneity of lung function. Temporal inhomogeneity was determined by the regional expiration time.

Results

A total of 34 participants were recruited in this study, of whom 24 completed the PR. After 2 weeks of intervention, the modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) dyspnea scale and the COPD assessment test (CAT) score was significantly lower compared to those measured before the treatment (2.3±1.17 vs. 2.1±0.93, P=0.034; and 15.0±7.18 vs. 10.9±6.06, P<0.001, respectively). Global spirometry forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1), FEV1 predicted percentage (%pred), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) were significantly better than they were pre-rehabilitation (2.1±0.86 vs. 2.3±0.90 L, P=0.018; 1.2±0.65 vs. 1.4±0.66 L, P=0.001; 46.8%±23.16% vs. 51.4%±24.41%, P<0.001; and 3.1±1.80 vs. 3.8±2.23 L/s, P=0.005, respectively). In addition, the CV for regional FEV1/FVC was significantly decreased after the PR treatment (0.26±0.161 vs. 0.17±0.077, P=0.002). Regional lung ventilation was more homogeneous and regional expiration time was shorter after 2 weeks of the PR treatment.

Conclusions

Two weeks of PR treatment can improve both spatial and temporal regional ventilation in COPD. In addition, EIT may be useful in developing individualized PR treatment program to improve regional lung function in COPD.

SUBMITTER: Ma H

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9469120 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Pulmonary rehabilitation ameliorates regional lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective single-arm clinical trial.

Ma Haiman H Dai Meng M Wu Shuo S Zhao Zhanqi Z Zhang Yan Y Zhao Feng F Yang Lin L Ti Xinyu X Qu Shuoyao S

Annals of translational medicine 20220801 16

<h4>Background</h4>Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a widely recognized nonpharmacologic therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but most of the current studies on whether PR can benefit COPD patients are based on the evaluation of symptoms and pulmonary function, which is limited to a certain extent. Because COPD is characterized by potential regional lung changes in morphology and pathophysiology, this study was designed to evaluate the effects of individualized PR on regiona ...[more]

PMID: 36111029

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePulmonary rehabilitation (PR) after exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is effective in reducing COPD hospitalizations and mortality while improving health-related quality of life, yet use of PR remains low. Estimates of the cost-effectiveness of PR in this setting could inform policies to improve uptake.ObjectiveTo estimate the cost-effectiveness of participation in PR after hospitalization for COPD.Design, setting, and participantsThis economic evaluation estimated the cost-effectiveness of participation in PR compared with no PR after COPD hospitalization in the US using a societal perspective analysis. A Markov microsimulation model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness in the US health care system with a lifetime horizon, 1-year cycle length, and a discounted rate of 3% per year for both costs and outcomes. Data sources included published literature from October 1, 2001, to April 1, 2021, with the primary source being an analysis of Medicare beneficiaries living with COPD between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2015. The analysis was designed and conducted from October 1, 2019, to December 15, 2021. A base case microsimulation, univariate analyses, and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed.InterventionsPulmonary rehabilitation compared with no PR after COPD hospitalization.Main outcomes and measuresNet cost in US dollars, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.ResultsAmong the hypothetical cohort with a mean age of 76.9 (age range, 60-92) years and 58.6% women, the base case microsimulation from a societal perspective demonstrated that PR resulted in net cost savings per patient of $5721 (95% prediction interval, $3307-$8388) and improved quality-adjusted life expectancy (QALE) (gain of 0.53 [95% prediction interval, 0.43-0.63] years). The findings of net cost savings and improved QALE with PR did not change in univariate analyses of patient age, the Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease stage, or number of PR sessions. In a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, PR resulted in net cost savings and improved QALE in every one of 1000 samples and was the dominant strategy in 100% of simulations at any willingness-to-pay threshold. In a 1-way sensitivity analysis of total cost, assuming completion of 36 sessions, a single PR session would remain cost saving to $171 per session and had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $884 per session for $50 000/QALY and $1597 per session for $100 000/QALY.Conclusions and relevanceIn this economic evaluation, PR after COPD hospitalization appeared to result in net cost savings along with improvement in QALE. These findings suggest that stakeholders should identify policies to increase access and adherence to PR for patients with COPD.

Project description:RationaleCurrent practice guidelines recommend pulmonary rehabilitation as an adjunct to standard pharmacologic therapy for individuals with moderate to severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Whether pulmonary rehabilitation benefits all subjects with COPD independent of baseline disease burden is not known.ObjectivesTo test whether pulmonary rehabilitation benefits patients with COPD independent of baseline exercise capacity, dyspnea, and lung function.MethodsData from a prospectively maintained database of participants with COPD enrolled in pulmonary rehabilitation at the University of Alabama at Birmingham from 1996 to 2013 were retrospectively analyzed. Subjects were divided into four quartiles based on their baseline level of dyspnea as assessed by the San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire at the initial visit. Similar quartiles were assessed for FEV1 percent predicted as well as the 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD). The primary outcome was the change in quality of life as measured by the 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Secondary outcomes were change in dyspnea, 6MWD, and depression scores assessed using the Beck Depression Inventory-II. Differences between baseline and final scores were compared using paired t tests and across quartiles using analysis of variance.Measurements and main resultsA total of 229 subjects were included. Their mean age was 66.5 (SD, 9) years. Ninety-one (40%) were female, and 42 (18%) were African American. The mean FEV1 percent predicted was 46.3% (20.0%). On completion of pulmonary rehabilitation, clinically significant improvements were seen in most components of SF-36: physical function, 11.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4-15.5; P < 0.001); health perception, 2.1 (95% CI, -0.7 to 4.8; P = 0.12); physical role, 16.7 (95% CI, 10.3-23.1; P < 0.001); emotional role, 14.7 (95% CI, 7.1-22.3; P < 0.001); social function, 16.4 (95% CI, 11.3-21.5; P < 0.001); mental health, 5.4 (95% CI, 2.6-8.3; P < 0.001); pain, 5 (95% CI, 1-9.1; P = 0.02); vitality, 12.4 (95% CI, 8.8-16.1; P < 0.001); and depression, 0.01 (95% CI, -0.11 to 0.07; P = 0.54). There was no difference in improvement in SF-36 across quartiles of San Diego Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, 6MWD, and FEV1 percent predicted.ConclusionsPulmonary rehabilitation results in significant improvement in quality of life, dyspnea, and functional capacity independent of baseline disease burden.

Dataset Information

Pulmonary rehabilitation ameliorates regional lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective single-arm clinical trial.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Pulmonary rehabilitation ameliorates regional lung function in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective single-arm clinical trial.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets