Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Robotic approach for pediatric pulmonary resection: preliminary investigation and comparative study with thoracoscopic approach.


ABSTRACT:

Background

Minimal invasive pulmonary resection in children is challenging, irrespective of whether it is conducted using a robot or a thoracoscope. This study presents the preliminary results of pediatric robotic pulmonary resection (RPR) and comparison outcomes with conventional thoracoscopic pulmonary resection (TPR).

Methods

This is a retrospective study conducted in patients underwent RPR (RPR group; n=30) and TPR (TPR group; n=44). The clinical data, including operative time, post-operative body temperature, surgical complications, surgeon's workload (by NASA-TLX), postoperative hospital stay, and scar score (using the SCAR scale), of both the RPR and TPR groups were collected and compared.

Results

Both groups had similar age and weight. The youngest patient belonged to the RPR group and was 6 months old and weighed 8 kg. One case in the RPR group and two in the TPR group were converted to thoracotomy. RPR had a longer total operative time (148.3±36.8 min), but a shorter pure operative time (103.9±28.5 min) than those of the TPR group [118.3±22.5 (P<0.001) and 111.4±18.3 min (P=0.045), respectively]. Compared to the TPR group, fewer patients in the RPR group reported fever postoperatively (2/29 vs. 11/42, P=0.039). The workload of the surgeons was also lower in the RPR group (55.2±4.7 vs. 62.9±6.0, P<0.01). No significant difference was observed in perioperative complications, drainage length, postoperative hospital stays, and scar score of the two groups.

Conclusions

The safety and effectiveness of the robotic approach are similar to those of the thoracoscopic surgery for pediatric pulmonary resection in children heavier than 8 kg. In addition, the robotic approach shows improved operative dissection efficiency and accuracy for patients and reduced workload for surgeons. Hence, it is beneficial to both surgeons and patients.

SUBMITTER: Li S 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9641347 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Oct

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Robotic approach for pediatric pulmonary resection: preliminary investigation and comparative study with thoracoscopic approach.

Li Shuai S   Luo Zhibin Z   Li Kang K   Li Yan Y   Yang Dehua D   Cao Guoqing G   Zhang Xi X   Zhou Ying Y   Chi Shuiqing S   Tang Shaotao S  

Journal of thoracic disease 20221001 10


<h4>Background</h4>Minimal invasive pulmonary resection in children is challenging, irrespective of whether it is conducted using a robot or a thoracoscope. This study presents the preliminary results of pediatric robotic pulmonary resection (RPR) and comparison outcomes with conventional thoracoscopic pulmonary resection (TPR).<h4>Methods</h4>This is a retrospective study conducted in patients underwent RPR (RPR group; n=30) and TPR (TPR group; n=44). The clinical data, including operative time  ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC10944767 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7222582 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11565304 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5529157 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC7330412 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11518930 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9735356 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC4360677 | biostudies-other
| S-EPMC11518964 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10112141 | biostudies-literature