A comparison of methods to harmonize cortical thickness measurements across scanners and sites.

ABSTRACT: Results of neuroimaging datasets aggregated from multiple sites may be biased by site-specific profiles in participants' demographic and clinical characteristics, as well as MRI acquisition protocols and scanning platforms. We compared the impact of four different harmonization methods on results obtained from analyses of cortical thickness data: (1) linear mixed-effects model (LME) that models site-specific random intercepts (LME_INT), (2) LME that models both site-specific random intercepts and age-related random slopes (LME_INT+SLP), (3) ComBat, and (4) ComBat with a generalized additive model (ComBat-GAM). Our test case for comparing harmonization methods was cortical thickness data aggregated from 29 sites, which included 1,340 cases with posttraumatic stress disor

SUBMITTER: Sun D 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9648725 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature