Dataset Information

Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes Comparing Patients With Invasive Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There is increasing interest in better understanding the biology and clinical presentation of invasive lobular cancer (ILC), which is the most common special histological subtype of breast cancer. Limited large contemporary data sets are available allowing comparison of clinicopathologic features between ILC and invasive ductal cancer (IDC).

Methods

The Great Lakes Breast Cancer Consortium was formed to compare clinical behavior of ILC (n = 3617) and IDC (n = 30 045) from 33 662 patients treated between 1990 and 2017 at 3 large clinical centers. We used Kaplan-Meier analysis, Cox proportional hazards modeling, and propensity score matching to evaluate treatment differences and outcomes. All statistical testing used 2-sided P values.

Results

Compared with IDC, patients with ILC were more frequently diagnosed at later stages and with more lymph node involvement (corrected P < .001). Estrogen receptor-positive ILCs were of lower grade (grade 1 and 2: 90% in ILC vs 72% in IDC) but larger in size (T3 and 4: 14.3% in ILC vs 3.4% in IDC) (corrected P < .001), and since 1990, the mean ILC size detected at diagnosis increased yearly. Patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive ILC underwent statistically significantly more mastectomies compared with ER-positive IDC (57% vs 46%). Using Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with ER-positive ILC had statistically significantly worse disease-free survival and overall survival than ER-positive IDC although 6 times more IDCs were classified as high risk by OncotypeDx Breast Recurrence Score assay.

Conclusions

This large, retrospective, collaborative analysis with 3 clinical centers identified meaningful differences in clinicopathological features between ILC and IDC, providing further evidence that these are 2 different entities requiring different clinical management.

SUBMITTER: Oesterreich S

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9664185 | biostudies-literature | 2022 Nov

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes Comparing Patients With Invasive Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancer.

Oesterreich Steffi S Nasrazadani Azadeh A Zou Jian J Carleton Neil N Onger Tiffany T Wright Matthew D MD Li Yujia Y Demanelis Kathryn K Ramaswamy Bhuvaneswari B Tseng George G Lee Adrian V AV Williams Nicole N Kruse Megan M

Journal of the National Cancer Institute 20221101 11

<h4>Background</h4>There is increasing interest in better understanding the biology and clinical presentation of invasive lobular cancer (ILC), which is the most common special histological subtype of breast cancer. Limited large contemporary data sets are available allowing comparison of clinicopathologic features between ILC and invasive ductal cancer (IDC).<h4>Methods</h4>The Great Lakes Breast Cancer Consortium was formed to compare clinical behavior of ILC (n = 3617) and IDC (n = 30 045) fr ...[more]

PMID: 36239760

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAdvanced breast cancer (ABC) is a heterogeneous disease with varied prognoses, that is affected by many clinicopathological features. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathological characteristics, first-line treatment (FLx), and prognostic impact of these features on survival among Syrian patients with ABC.Materials and methodsThis retrospective cohort study included patients with ABC. The association of clinicopathological factors with survival was assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test, as well as the Cox proportional hazards regression model to calculate the hazard ratio (HaR).ResultsA total of 423 patients with ABC were included in the study, with a median age (range) of 47 years (23-82). 83% of metastases were metachronous. Most patients (91.8%) received chemotherapy as the FLx. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all the patients were 7 and 16 months, respectively. The median PFS was associated with four factors, which were time of metastasis (adjusted HaR=1.861, 95% CI 1.420-2.438, P<0.0001), performance status (PS) (adjusted HaR=1.456, 95% CI 1.049-2.021, P=0.025), ovarian metastasis (adjusted HaR=7.907, 95% CI 1.049-59.576, P=0.045), and FLx (adjusted HaR=2.536, 95% CI 1.581-4.068, P<0.0001). Similarly, the OS was associated with three factors, including hormone receptors (HRs) status (adjusted HaR=1.124, 95% CI 1.009-1.252, P=0.034), time of metastasis (adjusted HaR=2.099, 95% CI 1.588-2.775, P<0.0001), and PS (adjusted HaR=1.787, 95% CI 1.429-2.233, P<0.0001). In the HR-positive/human epidermal growth receptor 2 (HER2)-negative group, endocrine therapy was significantly associated with longer PFS compared with chemotherapy (15 vs 7 months, adjusted HaR=2.699, 95% CI 1.417-5.143, P=0.003). Furthermore, there was no difference in OS between the two treatment modalities (P=0.855).ConclusionsABC survival varies depending on the location of metastases. Good PS and synchronous stage 4 disease were independent prognostic factors for longer PFS and OS. In the HR-positive/HER2-negative group, PFS for endocrine therapy was significantly longer than chemotherapy, with no differences in OS. This study confirms that endocrine therapy is preferred as an FLx for ABC in the HR-positive/HER2-negative group.

Dataset Information

Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes Comparing Patients With Invasive Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancer.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Clinicopathological Features and Outcomes Comparing Patients With Invasive Ductal and Lobular Breast Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets