Dataset Information

Motor, cognitive, and combined rehabilitation approaches on MS patients' cognitive impairment.

ABSTRACT:

Background

At the moment, the possible options for the management of cognitive dysfunctions in patients with MS (pMS) are pharmacological interventions, cognitive rehabilitation (CR), and physical exercise. However, worldwide, multimodal programs are infrequently applied in pMS and CR is not easily accessible through the National Health System as MR.

Objective

The aim of the study is to explore if the combination of motor and cognitive rehabilitation may favor better outcomes on cognitive efficiency compared to separate trainings.

Methods

Forty-eight pMS were submitted to detailed neuropsychological and motor assessments, before (T0) and after (T1) having performed one of three rehabilitation conditions (two cognitive trainings/week-Reha1; one cognitive and one motor training/week-Reha2; two motor trainings/week-Reha3, for 12 weeks); they were randomly assigned to one condition or another. The CR was focused on memory functioning and performed with the Rehacom program.

Results

No significant differences in age, sex, education, and disease course were found between the three groups (sig. > .05). Reha1 patients increased only their cognitive performance, and Reha3 only increased their motor performance, while Reha2 increased both cognitive and motor performances. This benefit was also confirmed by the cognitive efficiency expressed by the Cognitive Impairment Index.

Conclusions

These data confirm that to include cognitive training within rehabilitation programs may induce important benefits in pMS. Furthermore, pMS seem to benefit from a combined approach (cognitive and motor) more than from CR and motor rehabilitation separately (ClinicalTrial.gov ID: NCT05462678; 14 July 2022, retrospectively registered).

SUBMITTER: Argento O

PROVIDER: S-EPMC9769485 | biostudies-literature | 2023 Mar

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Motor, cognitive, and combined rehabilitation approaches on MS patients' cognitive impairment.

Argento Ornella O Piacentini Chiara C Bossa Michela M Caltagirone Carlo C Santamato Andrea A Saraceni Vincenzo V Nocentini Ugo U

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology 20221221 3

<h4>Background</h4>At the moment, the possible options for the management of cognitive dysfunctions in patients with MS (pMS) are pharmacological interventions, cognitive rehabilitation (CR), and physical exercise. However, worldwide, multimodal programs are infrequently applied in pMS and CR is not easily accessible through the National Health System as MR.<h4>Objective</h4>The aim of the study is to explore if the combination of motor and cognitive rehabilitation may favor better outcomes on c ...[more]

PMID: 36542204

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeUp to 70% of survivors report cognitive symptoms after chemotherapy. We compared two cognitive rehabilitation programs to a control group in cancer survivors.MethodsStudy population were adult cancer survivors with cognitive symptoms 6-60 months after adjuvant chemotherapy. Participants randomised to: Attention Process Training (APT), Compensatory Strategy Training (CST), or control group. Active interventions comprised 6-week, 2-h/week small group sessions.Assessmentspre- and post-intervention, 6- and 12-months later. Primary outcome was change in cognitive symptoms (FACT-COG-PCI subscale) between baseline and post-intervention. Secondary endpoints included objective neuropsychological performance, Functional Impact Assessment (FIA), patient-reported outcome measures, and associations. Analyses were on an intention-to-treat basis. Analysis of covariance mixed models were used for continuous outcomes.ResultsSixty-five participants were randomised (APT n = 21; CST n = 24; controls n = 20): 94% breast cancer, median age 54. Median time since chemotherapy 20.7 months. FACT-COG-PCI, clinical neuropsychological T-scores, and FIA improved in all groups over time, but no significant differences between arms. On mean neuropsychological T-scores 19/65 (29%) were impaired at baseline; post-intervention impairment controls 31.3%, CST 16.7%, APT 20.0%. On FIA at baseline, nine were impaired; this decreased to three post-intervention (one/group). FACT-COG-PCI was weakly associated with neuropsychological tests (rho = 0.24, p = 0.051) at baseline, and had no association with FIA. Neuropsychological total mean T-score was moderately positively associated with FIA (rho = 0.37, p = 0.003).ConclusionThere were no significant differences between intervention groups and controls using linear mixed models adjusted for baseline scores.Implications for cancer survivorsCognitive symptoms and neuropsychological test scores improve over time.

Project description:BACKGROUND:The course and outcomes of hip fracture patients are often complicated by the presence of dementia and delirium, referred to as cognitive impairment (CI), which limits access to in-patient rehabilitation. In response to this concern, members of our team developed and piloted an in-patient rehabilitation model of care (Patient-Centred Rehabilitation Model; PCRM) targeting patients with hip fracture and CI (PCRM-CI). We are now conducting a 3-year study comparing an inpatient rehabilitation model of care for community dwelling individuals with hip fracture and CI (PCRM-CI) to usual care to determine whether it results in improved mobility at the time of discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. METHODS/DESIGN:A non-equivalent pre-post design is being used to evaluate the PCRM-CI compared to usual care. All community dwelling (private home or retirement home) patients following a hip fracture are eligible to participate. Recruitment of both cohorts is taking place at two facilities. Target accrual is 70 hip fracture patients in the PCRM-CI cohort and 70 patients in the usual care cohort. We are also recruiting 70 health care providers (HCPs), who are being trained to implement the PCRM-CI, and their unit managers. Patient data are collected at baseline, discharge, and 6 months post-discharge from an inpatient rehabilitation program. Evaluations include mobility, physical function, and living arrangement. Additional outcome variables are being collected from medical records and from the patients via their proxies. Data on the prevalence and severity of dementia and delirium are being collected. Staff data are collected at baseline and one year after implementation of the model to determine change in staff knowledge and attitudes toward patients with hip fracture and CI. Bi-monthly semi-structured interviews with unit managers have been conducted to examine factors and barriers influencing the model implementation. Data collection began in 2009 and is expected to be completed in 2012. The control cohort of 70 patients has been recruited, and 45 patients have been accrued to the intervention group to date. DISCUSSION:Evaluation of this model of care is timely given the increasing proportion of persons with cognitive impairment and hip fractures. TRIAL REGISTRATION:The study is registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov, Identifier NCT01566136.

Project description:In addition to clinical comorbidities, psychological and neuropsychological problems are frequent in COPD and may affect pulmonary rehabilitation delivery and outcome. The aims of the study were to describe a COPD population in a rehabilitative setting as regards the patients depressive symptoms, anxiety, mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and self-reported adherence and to analyze their relationships; to compare the COPD sample MCI scores with normative data; and to investigate which factors might predict adherence to prescribed physical exercise. This was a multicenter observational cross-sectional study. Of the 117 eligible stable COPD inpatients, 84 were enrolled according to Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) criteria (mainly in Stage III-IV). The assessment included Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), anxiety, depression and self-reported pharmacological and nonpharmacological adherence. From the MMSE, 3.6% of patients were found to be impaired, whereas from the MoCA 9.5% had a likely MCI. Patients referred had mild-severe depression (46.7%), anxiety (40.5%), good pharmacological adherence (80.3%) and difficulties in following prescribed diet (24.1%) and exercise (51.8%); they struggled with disease acceptance (30.9%) and disease limitations acceptance (28.6%). Most of them received good family (89%) or social (53%) support. Nonpharmacological adherence, depression, anxiety and MCI showed significant relations with 6-minute walking test, body mass index (BMI) and GOLD. Depression was related to autonomous long-term oxygen therapy modifications, disease perception, family support and MCI. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, higher BMI, higher depression and lower anxiety predicted lower adherence to exercise prescriptions (P=0.0004, odds ratio =0.796, 95% CI =0.701, 0.903; P=0.009, odds ratio =0.356, 95% CI =0.165, 0.770; and P=0.05, odds ratio =2.361, 95% CI =0.995, 5.627 respectively). In COPD patients, focusing on pharmacological and nonpharmacological adherence enhance the possibility of tailored pulmonary rehabilitation programs.

Project description:BackgroundMild cognitive impairment (MCI) is defined as an intermediate stage between normal aging and Alzheimer's disease (AD), and early and easily available interventions to delay the progress of MCI to AD are necessary. Feasible complementary and alternative therapies such as electroacupuncture (EA), exercise, and cognitive training have shown some beneficial effects on MCI and AD. Here we report the protocol for a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and safety of EA combined with computer-based cognitive rehabilitation (EA-CCR) for the treatment of MCI.MethodsThe study will be a prospective, outcome assessor-blinded, parallel-arm, single-center (DongShin University Gwangju Korean Medicine Hospital, Republic of Korea), pilot randomized controlled clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Participants with MCI will be randomized to a computer-based cognitive rehabilitation (CCR) or an EA-CCR group (n = 18 each). The CCR group will receive RehaCom cognitive rehabilitation once (30 min) a day, 3 days per week (excluding Saturday and Sunday) for 8 weeks. The EA-CCR group will receive EA at Baihui (GV20), Sishencong (EX-HN1), Fengchi (GB20), and Shenting (GV24) in addition to RehaCom cognitive rehabilitation once (EA:30 min, CCR:30 min) a day, 3 days per week (excluding Saturday and Sunday) for 8 weeks. The primary outcome will be an improvement in cognitive function assessed using the Korean version of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive subscale. Scores for the Korean version of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment scale, Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale, Korean Activities of Daily Living scale, Korean Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale, and European Quality of Life Five Dimension Five Level Scale will be recorded as secondary outcome measures. All scores will be recorded at baseline (before intervention), 8 weeks after the first intervention (i.e., at the end of the intervention), and 12 weeks after completion of the intervention.DiscussionThe study is expected to provide preliminary evidence regarding the efficacy, safety, and usefulness of EA-CCR for the treatment of MCI.Trial registrationKorea Clinical Information Service, cris.nih.go.kr, KCT0003415 . Registered on 4 January 2019. Retrospectively registered, http://cris.nih.go.kr .

Dataset Information

Motor, cognitive, and combined rehabilitation approaches on MS patients' cognitive impairment.

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

Motor, cognitive, and combined rehabilitation approaches on MS patients' cognitive impairment.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets